-
Posts
14,125 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
111
Lucifers Hero last won the day on November 10
Lucifers Hero had the most liked content!
Previous Fields
-
Favourite Player(s)
Salem, Barassi, Stynes, Hunt, CP5, McVee
Profile Information
-
Gender
Female
-
Location
Bayside
-
Interests
MFC, Bridge, Travel, Good food and wine
Recent Profile Visitors
Lucifers Hero's Achievements
Legend (6/10)
39.8k
Reputation
-
THE 2024 AFL PRE-SEASON AND ROOKIE DRAFTS
Lucifers Hero replied to Demonland's topic in Trade, Draft & Free Agency
I can't find definitive nor current info on that. To the best of my knowledge it includes: International Players, NGA players that aren't drafted (but NGA eligibility keeps changing) Players from other sports Players that haven't played AFL at any level for three years. Some AFL publications purport to answer your question but are woefully out of date so I've not linked them. -
THE 2024 AFL PRE-SEASON AND ROOKIE DRAFTS
Lucifers Hero replied to Demonland's topic in Trade, Draft & Free Agency
Not quite. As AMW appears to be an A rookie we have one B rookie spot. -
2025 List and Contract Details
Lucifers Hero replied to red and blue forever's topic in Melbourne Demons
As AMW appears to be an A Rookie the answer no, as we don't have a list spot. -
PRESEASON TRAINING: Friday 22nd November 2024
Lucifers Hero replied to Satyriconhome's topic in Melbourne Demons
They are Deeeeeeelightfully Deeeeeeeeeelusional! 😁 -
2025 List and Contract Details
Lucifers Hero replied to red and blue forever's topic in Melbourne Demons
The AFL often do not date their releases so should be used with caution. That link is very old; definitely pre covid. The 2023 CBA is the current 'bible'. It runs until 2027 with adjustments as and when announced. -
2025 List and Contract Details
Lucifers Hero replied to red and blue forever's topic in Melbourne Demons
To clarify the rookie tenure rules. Somewhere on DL it was assumed the new 5 year/10 AFL game rule does not apply to B rookies. I've found nothing from the AFL/AFLPA nor any club to support that assumption. The assumption was that, because a media report listed AMW as an A rookie, the new rule doesn't/can't apply to B rookies. That 'logic' doesn't compute as there may be other reasons AMW is no longer a B rookie eg because the club needed two B rookie spots to draft Andrew and Mentha. The status change for AMW would be a timing coincidence not because the new rule doesn't apply to B rookies. -
2025 List and Contract Details
Lucifers Hero replied to red and blue forever's topic in Melbourne Demons
-
PRESEASON TRAINING: Friday 22nd November 2024
Lucifers Hero replied to Satyriconhome's topic in Melbourne Demons
Great way for team mates to say "welcome back"! -
btw the 🤮is for their smug entitled club not in any way for your good self, Tim.
-
the-age-quiz Feeling quite chuffed - answered 2,4, 6, 8 and 10 without looking at possible answers 🙃
-
Welcome to Demonland: Aidan Johnson
Lucifers Hero replied to Whispering_Jack's topic in Trade, Draft & Free Agency
Snap!! -
Welcome to Demonland: Aidan Johnson
Lucifers Hero replied to Whispering_Jack's topic in Trade, Draft & Free Agency
Haven't folks noticed the average age of our tall fwds is about 21! Even with Petty and Turner it isn't much older. They get pushed around a bit. Having Johnson will support the team in so many ways. Get behind folks; he is now a Demon!- 227 replies
-
- 18
-
THE 2024 AFL • NATIONAL DRAFT - DAY TWO
Lucifers Hero replied to Whispering_Jack's topic in Trade, Draft & Free Agency
Often with borderline F/S or NGA a club says if not selected in the draft we will take you as a rookie but unlikely to match a bid and wish you well. Gives the player reassurance of being on a list. For a player reckon they would rather be selected outright. Reckon Riak would be chuffed at being selected at #55 in such an even draft. I noticed Sydney looked quite bemused that we didn't match! ps hope you feel better about it having slept on it. -
THE 2024 AFL NATIONAL DRAFT - DAY ONE
Lucifers Hero replied to Whispering_Jack's topic in Trade, Draft & Free Agency
Big picture: North offered future 1st to every club bidding after #9 so clearly wanted a key fwd and probably rated Whitlock much higher than #27. After all there were a few 'bolters' last night. Given their list they could afford to go for 'needs'. They received Rich future 2nd back- probably 19 or 20 both will be premium picks as they will be first up at the start of night 2. North have given up pick 4-6 for 19-20 and a key player; one who probably would usually be taken higher except there were many exceptional midfielders at the pointy end. Looks fine to me; not fantastic but an important deal for them. -