Willmoy1947

You must have been in the same school as me, because i was very close to there.

I'm thinking more Melksham or Kozzie

And Happy Hammond

Any good to use "Shack" as in Shane McAdam

Flower, the true meaning of" poetry in motion" and i loved poetry.

Best exponent of Goal to Goal chances MFC have ahead of them for the next ten years.

In the VFL, i would put him on the toughest, meanest player in the opposition EVERY WEEK, rain hail or shine, until the penny dropped.

I reckon in a month we will know who to lock down from their runners. Kossie would have been a difference, maybe not to win but it would be closer.

No more church for me for another month now.

The numbers of Yellow shirts to watch were 32 and 2, so far. Number 32 did the Richmond game, which cost them severely, along with the other one Number 2. Number 32 did our Game up until he lost the plot and cost us a goal when he called play on inexplicably, and then wasn't sighted again.

Just in case no one had noticed , but oppositions generally poo themselves when the ball goes within ten metres of him.

They both shouldn't have been in the GF in the first place

Danger officially joined the thugs club yesterday. The two other players who are in the club are Cox and Maynard.

That's not written for our consumption, that is specifically for the Bulldog Rucks, to stir them up...

How do you get to sit in on Reviews? Everyone gets filthy when they are dropped.

And after all, all they do is offer money , Adelaide hasn't won a flag in the last ten years, and they both don't look likely in the next ten years.

Can't say the AFL haven't been warned.... going to be the mother of all class actions if they let it get to that.

And he was still doing it against GWS, once where i thought a bit close to the eyes of TOBY for my liking. Toby got up and got on with the game.

Wasn't it the AFL that said that "the specialist advised him to stop playing"

Danger.....you are finished WTF he says.

From a legal standpoint that might be a good place to start, Like a show cause why not, perhaps just at the moment from an exploratory position. Maybe a letter to the AFL at the same time. The AFL like to use a "please explain" when it suits them..

We don't want any of our players to get to the stage of wanting to leave Melbourne, and the best way to do that is to make sure the Club is the best place for them to be happy, and if not why not.

Definitely agree with this and add that it made us look somewhat unfit and that couldn't be possible could it? Oliver not withstanding because he must have covered many kilometres.

Has anyone mentioned anything about what the absence of Brayshaw would have made in Thursdays game? i haven't really made the effort to go back 10 or 15 pages to check, but i think he would have made a bit of difference in positioning of some players on both sides, especially in the talks that he had in the centre with the other senior players quite often.

We all knew that anyway. His Uncle said so. Ralph is a rat catcher. You can see the way Lyon looks at him. All these mugs do is look at everyone's Forums.