Macca

Sometimes a draw is quite helpful as it was when Collingwood drew with us in 2010 ... after that draw all the Pies had to do was concentrate on winning without the need to work on their percentage They had a very good team so a top 4 or top 2 position on the ladder was almost assured They had the opportunity to rest their stars in the last quarter's of games (saving the legs) ... and that's what they did from my observations But this draw for Freo has come late in the season and now they are relying on a team or 2 losing a game or 2 Unless the Bombers upset the Pies and/or the Lions lose against the Suns, they will be in 5th place by the end of the round (after starting the round in 4th place)

It's not just our team that benefits from Freo drawing the game Freo were 4th heading into tonight's game ... level on premiership points with Collingwood but with a much healthier percentage But if the Pies win on Sunday against Essendon and the Lions win (as expected) against the Suns then Freo will drop to 5th and out of the double-chance position (at least, temporarily) Therefore, taking their own destiny out of their own hands (at least in the short term)

Here's an example as to why the draw hurts Freo If they had have won tonight (and we beat the dogs) then they'd end up 1 win behind us (and percentage) So if that happens (or had have happened) the game next week could see Freo move above us on the ladder if they defeat us by a big enough margin (say, for instance, a 12 goal win) But because of the draw tonight, that can't happen (assuming we defeat the doggies) They would be 1 & a half wins behind us so it wouldn't matter how much the margin of victory might be next week

Freo drawing suits us ... serves as a loss for them in all reality. More so in relation to the teams above them If we win tomorrow night and then defeat Freo next week they would then be 2 and a half wins behind us with 4 games to play in the season (instead of just 2 wins behind) So the ball is our court ... we control our own destiny as they've just dropped 2 valuable premiership points Of course we have to win tomorrow night (first of all)

Gawn just has to be played as a permanent forward for this game

What a mightmare it turned out to be ... hard to believe that we didn't unearth 1 topliner with all those picks in the top 20 I accept the whole development angle and we weren't a greatly run club (prior to AFL intervention ... PJ & Roos) but you'd reckon that at least a couple of players could have shone through (?) And then in steps JT turning draft picks into gold. A big attribute of his has been his ability to turn 1st & 2nd round picks into solid talent (and premiership players) Brown, Langdon, Hibberd, Melksham, Tomlinson, May, Lever all came to the club using draft picks that would have otherwise been used on 18yo's As well as of course drafting 18yo's that have turned up trumps ... Oliver, Brayshaw, Petracca, Jackson, Kossie, Rivers, Bowey, Salem and various others JT is a real success story and we have a lot to thank him for But I highly doubt he'd be happy if we only ended up with pick 19 for Brayshaw And I'm with Redleg, we won't be losing him

We keep ridin' the JT train, rjay The bloke has got a great eye for talent Up there with Wells, Clayton & the Richmond recruiter

All the draftees tried their best ... but that's the vagaries of drafting Since that time we've done extra well It's a bit like betting on the horses!

And a pick around the 20 mark might deliver players such as Tapscott, Blease, Maric or Strauss (for a proven player like Brayshaw) Hope you enjoy that little flashback, folks! haha

Picks 10-12 could deliver a player like Lucas Cook, Gysberts, Weideman or Clark Busts are a part of drafting and need to be factored in. Doing so (factoring in the busts) is good business practice In a general sense draft picks are severely overrated ... and the points system adds fuel to the fire If it comes to it I'd want a pick around the 6-8 mark for Brayshaw And that pick has a 50% chance of being a bust anyway That's the truth and that's what the data tells us (historically)

If we lost Brayshaw to free agency then we could get as little as pick 19 (or worse) in return in compensation But there is a good chance that his management (the same as Luke Jackson's) is eyeing off a bigger salary if LJ departs In the meantime, he's quite entitled to test the market to see what he's possibly worth That's pro sports

@layzie@Clintosaurus @WERRIDEE @Vipercrunch Good match-up on 9GemHD tonight Eels (6th) vs Broncos (5th) ... at the new Commbank Stadium in Parramatta

The Buddy contract comparison is a trifle misleading as well He'd almost certainly command a much bigger salary these days. The new upcoming salary cap will be a lot more compared to 10 years ago. Probably a $15Million contract rather than $10Million back in 2013 (in my view) Also, Buddy was a free agent so there was no trade ... if it was a trade then Hawthorn would have rightfully demanded a lot more than the paltry compensation that they received (pick 19?) Back then (if they were able to trade Franklin) they might have been asking for 2 top 10 picks and a good player in a trade (as a minimum)

I agree but Jackson has enormous potential and a huge upside His game against the Lions just a few weeks ago gave us a glimpse on how good he can be If it comes to it the club should take the stance that we are selling a star ... and you never sell yourself short

He could be elite and if the offer is true, that's what they'll be investing in Personally, I believe he could be great player as he has all the basic requirements. So we might be losing a real talent, regardless Marking the bloke down is a natural tendency especially if we know he is leaving. We won't want him to be exceptional in those circumstances But it's my belief that he is not necessarily gone anyway. Freo still have to come to the party. If not, we'll reach a stalemate

I'm predicting a stalemate unless they can somehow come up with the currency And it is looking like LJ might be on the move especially if the money offer is close to the truth ... it's a life changing amount if true (and everyone has a price) But we can play hardball and just on that, the 2 clubs might have an in principle deal on the table ... if Freo can come up with what we want, they get him And our ambit claim might be quite substantial But I'm speculating of course because in reality I know diddly squat!!

It's a good point you make ... the trade needs to in some ways match the dollars in the new contract elsewhere (if it all goes that way) And if it's a huge amount then the value in dollar terms should equal a similar value in picks and players An example at the lower end of the scale might be something like a 3rd or 4th round pick for a player being offered a 2 year deal elsewhere on below average money It's mere speculation but what would fair compensation be for a former no.3 pick who might be getting offered $10.5Million over 8 years elsewhere?

Eddie never makes any sense when he goes into supporter mode Tries to justify his alarmist comments with more alarmist conclusions He's a walking contradiction I'm not sure I've ever met a reasonably minded Collingwood supporter though. They are all a law unto themselves with chips on their shoulders the size of Mars

As a perfect lead in to the Commonwealth Games, Eleanor Patterson has just won the High Jump Gold medal at the World Championships ... a fantastic achievement!! n.b. The 1 hour packaged highlights of the Athletics World Championships are being shown daily on SBS Demand Here are the highlights of the Womens High Jump event

I can't think of anyone either ... but the only staging for high contact way back when was generally ducking the head and back in the day, at all levels, that practice was frowned upon and those who ducked their heads were generally pinged for holding the ball Most of the other staging was for holding the man with players regularly having their arms outstretched (flapping) to accentuate the contact (every now and again Clarrie does it and it always looks comical! ... and it never works!) Diving forward after being tackled from behind was also practised a fair bit as was accentuating a push in the back in marking contests But the game was much more open decades ago so the umps had a far greater chance to differentiate what was authentic and what wasn't authentic Nowadays, there are a myriad of players around numerous contests so the sport is now indinitely more difficult to adjudicate correctly There's cause & effect at play here and the first thing I'd do is reduce the amount of players on the field to 16 a side. And slash the interchange numbers by at least half Make the game more open and free flowing and then it's way easier for the umpires ... and the umpires should be full time as well (part time umpires in a fully professional league doesn't make sense) But the umpires aren't at fault with all the staging for high contact that goes on ... it's a rules of the game issue (AFL)

It's always about the money but if you've got great systems, structures & standards the money will flow as a matter of course So the custodians wait for the proverbial to hit the fan before acting? Bad governance

It's 360° game so the rules are always going to be exploited ... we may be just witnessing the tip of the iceberg Need better custodians

The custodians can't just stand idly by and only concentrate on the money and the revenues And many of the numerous rule changes over the years (and implications) have been good for the game (and that includes coming down hard on the KB (and others) in staging for free kicks Of course we are going to complain ... that's what any individual might do when something is obviously wrong Let the game evolve? Into what?

Back in the day if you played for frees you rarely got them and then ran the risk of never getting a free kick for the game The umps frowned upon the stagers and rightfully so

Wouldn't matter if the umpires were full time in this instance, Gonzo ... the infringements themselves are painted grey It's like diving in soccer ... partially fixed with retrospective penalties or on the spot via VAR Not totally fixed but it's miles better Re footy ... even with retrospective bans the players are still going to milk contact from time to time But they've at least got to try and fix things as it's getting worse (the milking of high contact frees) They've ignored the issue for too long