Yourenextdipper

It's exactly the same Sue. Try searching Thomo and see what you find. Whipped out of existence because of an unpopular opinion. It's amazing how you believe that there is a difference because you support the same team as Whispering Jack, you like Satyricon and a few others are no different to the masses in the cult of Hird. If my posts were not whiped you would see that what I was banned for is now the common group think, just unpopular at the time

That's quite hypocritical of you WJ. My account 'Thomo' was banned and all posts deleted for being critical of Cameron Schwab, Mark Neeld and Liam Jurrah, and Demonland admin will not give any other reason to me except this. My posts were not crude or defamatory , but the content was not liked by your team, even though in hindsight it was all spot on. How are bomber blitz any different?

I think you are being deliberately deceptive here. As you would be able to see, I set up a second account (this one) when I was having trouble logging in one time, but never actually used it until you banned me without any explanation, and if you read my posts you will see that I have advised that this is my second user name and the reason for it. I'm not sure how that would be against the code of conduct. As for second user names, I received a warning from the mods for exposing Enforcers multiple usernames, so this does seem quite hypocritical to me. I also find it interesting that there are moderator notes but no notice or information was passed to me. If the posts are still there, I'd be interested to see which ones caused the banning, for a life ban with no explanation I'm assuming I must have made severe breaches, used foul language, made threats etc, around the time of the ban??? Surely it would not just be a few opinions that were not shared by the moderators? I'm happy for you to post them here, or message them to me. Wolfmother, at the time of banning I had also been posting that Mark Neeld was the wrong choice as coach, and that Cameron Schwab was bad for the club. Many posters, such as RPFC and whatever alias Enforcer was allowed to use at the time, were quite critical of these opinions (now facts), and the mods obviously agreed with them, so I was banned. Aside from that my posts were generally respectfull, and I believe contributed well to the forum.

This was the last thread I posted in before a mod deleted posts and banned me. Not sure why you can't see it now, but it happened. http://demonland.com/forums/index.php?/topic/31044-liam-jurrah/page-3

Username was 'Thomo', don't care about the money, however my issue is that there was never any communication as to why my username was cancelled. I disagreed with this the group-think in the last thread I posted in - I dared to suggest that Rudeboy was not working in the best interests of the MFC and Jurrah would not be at the club in the future (corrcect on all accounts) - then I could not log back in.

And the wannabe Mod pipes in.....

I wouldn't subscribe again. Last time I paid up as a life member, as I had been using the forum for a while. Without any explanation my I was banned for life a few weeks later, the mods took my money and ran, and about 12 months later I still have no idea why. Mods on this forum have egos out of control

That response is seriously embarrassing for you. I can't stand when people on forums who are struggling to come up with a decent rebuttle use the " back to school","school holidays","school tomorrow" line. It really does make you look stupid. Trengove is not up to AFL standard, so you have to try and belittle posters to cover. You didn't draft him, why are you trying so hard to deflect from him being poor? I can't I understand why supporters think that because a player was drafted by Melbourne they have to suspend reality and defend them even when there is no rational argument.

As a fourth year midfielder, regardless of draft pick, he is below average. To think that he was pick number 2 and gifted the captaincy is shocking.

That's crap. Brisbane had 6 teenagers playing today, Melbourne had none. The best player on the ground trained under Bailey and was not in the top 10 in the time trials at Melbourne, but is dominating now. The excuses are pathetic. Bailey was a terrible coach, Neeld is worse. Two very bad decisions.

If that's what he said, yes

Just read that, unless its out of context he should be sacked immediately

Delist. Bad draft pick. Their is nothing that he has shown to indicate he will be an AFL standard player. Slow, poor kick, can not kick long, poor awareness and uninspiring as a teammate. He was never seen as a high draft pick until late in the national championships, and Melbourne got caught up in the hype of his SANFL finals game. He was an early developer that could play well against jouniers or state players, but not up to it. Can't believe he was gifted the captaincy as a marketing play, embarrassing as a club. Should not play AFL again, cut the loses and move on.

I that a joke?

Imagine how good Maloney will be after three Neeld preseasons. The lack of fitness in ex Melbourne players in him, Martin, Rivers and McClean has really been an issue

Good on Davey for having a go when Tapscott got roughed up

If Trengove wasn't pick two he would be delisted at the end of the season. Clearly he has shown nothing in four years that shows he is better than a good VFL player. Making him captain as a marketing ploy must be the worst decision in the 150 history of the club.

Which clubs list is not better than Melbournes?

It's a very poor list, I would swap it for every other list in the AFL. As bad as Fitroy in their final years. A lot of people are talking things up after last weekend, but remember they were three goals down and looking terrible until GWS came to a stand still.

Satyriconhome this forum would be much better off without you constantly sniping and insulting anyone that does not share your opinion. You are a broken record. I get it, you believe that the club can do no wrong and you are a supirior supporter to everyone else. Now either add something new to your posts or move on, I'm sick if reading the same post from you every two minutes.

Not at troll, a paid up member who finished school in the 90's and predicted that Melbourne would finish bottom 2 when trade week was completed due to the terrible top up strategy. The club traded for leadership, but were any of the players that Melbourne picked up in their previous clubs leadership groups?

Plenty of ordinary players have been lucky enough to be part of a premiership team, it does not mean that he as an individual is a good player. If Collingwood thought that Dawes was in their best 22 he would still be there. He was told that he would not be in the best 22 and should look elsewhere (by the coaches and players!!! He wrote about this). He will be in the best 22 at Melbourne because the club has recruited poorly, including topping up with players who are not seen as AFL standard by other clubs. Melbourne got into this mess by thinking that they were smarter at judging talent than other clubs and drafting poorly, maybe now they should start to pay attention to who other clubs say are not up to it.

Brisbane wanted to keep Clark, Collingwood players told Dawes that he would struggle to get a game and should look elsewhere. Huge difference.

He may be a smart bloke, but remember in his last article he said that the coaching staff and the players told him that he should move on from Collingwood because he was not good enough. Like most Melbourne players, the more games they miss the higher Demonland rate them. Struggled at Collongwood, they got rid of him and recruited an old player in Lynch. I don't see how he will be any better at Melbourne.

This is why the AFL need to step in and take control of the club. They can cover the costs of sacking incompetent staff and put the club in the right direction, otherwise it's all over.