Adam The God

Copy and paste, huh?

You really are Demonland's answer to 'old man shouts at clouds'. Also, you're wrong. Again.

A.r.r.o.g.a.n.t.

I think they meant a good small forward. Still, it will be a bluff. Not sure we'd openly talk draft strategy on the MFC website. We'll take best available.

Kemp for me at pick 3. I reckon Gould seems like a Hurn clone and I'd take him in the Young position who will by gone by that pick anyway.

I reckon there's a strong chance the thinking when we went after a second first rounder was, package two top 10 picks for an A grader at GWS or get two bites of the cherry in the top 10. This way, we'd get one kid who might be able to make a difference in 2020 and the second kid is so good that him sitting out in 2020 due to injury is worth it because of his talent, and in this situation, we'd still have the ability to service our 22 in 2020 with a Gould or Young type. If our recruiters think Green is good enough, I'd be nominating him at 3, then going Kemp at 4 if GWS match and taking Gould at 8.

If we're talking x factor too, Martin isn't even in the same street as Bennell. The latter has precisely what our midfield lacks, if as you say, he can get on the park.

HUSTLERS on the other hand actually makes the most of its story. Besides RZ's performance, JUDY butchers it.

Kemp #3 and Gould at #8 for me. I know we don't address our small forward problem with those picks, but you don't draft for list holes, you draft for the best players.

Be interesting to see where Gould lands. No one I've seen has him in the top 10, but he has very good attributes to be become a very good AFL player.

Saty's contribution there is as cringey as the end of JUDY. (Don't see JUDY btw)

I don't think he's the right player for us. I certainly wouldn't pay above average AFL wage for his services.

Eh? What are you blabbering on about?

Clarry will be alright.

I'm happy either way. I'm happy if we take our current 2 top 10 picks to the draft. I'd also be happy to split the picks if we could land 3 top 10 picks.

Where would he sit in your best 22? I can't envisage him at Melbourne unless I can see him in one of your best 22s.

Who's the better kick. Young or Gould?

He looks a beautiful kick going by those highlights. Little bit of pace too. Looks like he could lose 5kgs comfortably and gain a little more speed from that. I think we'll only be looking at him if we split our picks again, as you say, Rusty.

Charlie goes alright. A very good link up player. He doesn't get it a lot yet but when he does, it usually ends up in a score.

Sssssh. Don't mention Ash. Mere mention of his name attracts Osilik to threads.

It's not his natural position because he isn't good enough in that position. He might have made it as a half forward/ winger where he started, so I'd argue that's his 'natural' position.

I reckon this is the case. So before some go you go mouthing off at 'how could we possibly not be able to afford him', think about this.

Thanks for these.

Kemp seems to hit the contest in a similar way to Martin or Oliver. He accelerates into the stoppage, rather than being flat footed. Seems like a natural ball winner for that reason and unlike Oliver, appears to be able to play more time forward, followed by bursts in the midfield. This will suit him coming into the AFL system. It's early, but could have a similar trajectory to Martin. I can see the Bontempelli comparisons too, but will be interesting to see if we're seriously looking at this kid.

Martin is an interesting one, because I'm not entirely sure whether he's built for the system we should be playing. He's slight, I'd say a little weak at the contest, but his positive attributes of poise and skill are a much needed commodity in our forward line. If our FD rate him and decide to go after him, and we can convince him to come, I'll be happy, but I won't be crying into my cereal if we don't get him.