sue

That was the match I was thinking of.

Kayo only streams 3 matches a week. Surely they don't have rights over the others. In fact an earlier match was streamed that Kayo wasn't doing, so it seems they don't have rights to those. If the footage is done for the coaches etc, why not stream it too? Didn't look top secret. I'm no expert on Casey radio, but it didn't strike me as a radio broadcast.

I posted this in the Casey Geelong thread, but since people may not be looking at that now, I'm raising it here: I see on the MFC website they have video of all the VFL goals and what sounds like a full-on commentary of the entire match. Did anyone find out if that was being streamed? Who made it? If not streamed, why not? What equipment is missing to stream it? etc?

I see on the MFC website they have video of all the VFL goals and what sounds like a full-on commentary of the entire match. Did anyone find out if that was being streamed? Who made it? If not streamed, why not? What equipment is missing to stream it? etc?

What about having a number of players start on the flank(s) and converge towards the centre when the full back indicates he is going to kick it up the middle in an atempt to create an outnumber in the centre? (I wouldn't put me in change of strategy)

I've must have missed something. Could someone tell me why milk is worse than gastroade? Just because it is more visible?

Looks sus to me. Especially since there is no evidence so far that anyone is actually videoing the match.

Kayo seems to be doing 3 other games. I stumbled across this - no idea how kosher it is or where they'd be getting the feed from? https://www.facebook.com/101463378730693/posts/-casey-vs-geelong-cats-2-livestream-live-casey-vs-geelong-cats-2-vfllivestream-h/111664947710536/

I watched both those VFL matches where he kicked the 14 goals. But who was his direct and indirect opponents in those matches? Were they AFL listed? Were they any good? Casey won by large amounts; was that because the opponents were so bad, or was it due to Weed kicking loads of goals? These are all genuine questions, not rhetorical. I'm not anti-Weed in any way but I wonder whether we have a reliable guide to how in-form he is. Other than the club being prepared to pick hims this week - which perhaps answers my questions. Though maybe there is also a keep Weed happy element in the decision.

I feel I am in the minority in not applauding this change. With the VFL scheduling being all over the place with respect to the afl's, it just places more difficulties in the way making of selection decisions.

In addition, when the greasy player is tackled the tackler ends up with slippery hands impeding his subsequent ball handling ability. Oil should be banned both because of this and because it causes unintentional head high contact.

If you hit it wth your fist I don't think it matters if it looks like a flick pass, it is not. However the appearance will increase the chance of it being mistakenly called a throw. But as for where the momentum comes from, you are right. These days most of it comes from the hand/arm holding the ball, not from the punch even when it isn't overhead. I think this creates a more free flowing game and that's why it isn't cracked down upon. As long as we don't end up with one handed throws (a la gridiron).

The umps have gone crazy about that. What totally mystifies me, is what is the actual definition of the line that they have moved off. There seems to be no consistency (did I just say that about umpiring?). Can anyone state how the rules define what the line is? Is it a line between the mark and the centre of the team's goals, even if you are kicking deep in defense? Seems not. To compound this with the new 'stand' rule, players rarely stand on the actual mark, so no one really knows where it really is. I'm amused that before this new rule, players would stand on the mark and then shuffle sideways to cut off the corridor. Now they just go there immediately and the umpire calls 'stand'.

wouldn't they get more vision than the humble viewer gets? (Not that that still would be as good as being there.)

Thanks. Yes he certainly tripped him, but since when do you get fined for an accidental trip like that? If you do an intentional trip then you should be rubbed out, not just fined.

After all this discussion about Fritsch, I've now looked for why Brayshaw was got for a trip. Just watched the whole match and I couldn't see where it happened. Can someone please point out when it happened.

Ordered. Hope it won't be too depressing.

I don't doubt that some supporters of all clubs will whinge unreasonably at times, but to me it is as clear as day that the dollar driven AFL plays favourites where they think it is good business to do so.

I too doubt anyone has it in for us, but it may feel that way when others get favourite treatment. Result is not dissimilar.

Something went wrong in the saw the lady in half trick?

You can clear cookies on a specific domain. I use the add-on "forget me not" as a quick way to do so. (Ingognito windows don't always work - though seems it does on the Age - I'm not a big reader.)

clear your cookies etc if you are on a laptop

They might have personalized inserts which may obviate the need for special boots. Had some myself years ago for planar faciitis.

What's the evidence that a personalized pair of boots solves the problem he has? (Not saying it's not true, just interested.)

I wonder how much Tomlinson's injury had on the mental state of the rest of the team. Would be pretty depressing all round. Of course nothing compared to himself.