beelzebub

As i understand it . You're employing someone not buying a product. Essendon wouldn't be answerable to us for any stupidity on our part.

Couldn't give a fig about Milkshake. He can't matter to our immediate future as he won't and never was going to part of it. No one's been banned !! You say. Funny...the process to do so hasn't come to its conclusion. You do comprehend that ? The most appropriate meaning of principle in all of this is the application of common sense. Why buy out of a barrel of rotten fruit ? Especially when elsewhere are shelves of good unspoilt offerings.

Really..you think this is all down to a couple of articles Stuie. This is about what we've been talking about for years now. When Melksham gets banned what excuse will you offer on behalf of the club ?

All working fine as far as I can tell ..even on mobile , currently samsung galaxy s4...will switch to nexus 5 soon . Don't expect a problem. It's a tricky job often porting platforms. Don't miss it a bit Well done chaps

How diligent though, really. Any of a number here can see the plain folly of it all. Is irrelevant as to anything the AFL thinks or promises as they aren't the deciders. Quite frankly I'm rather dismayed and my impression of the collected acumen if the club has dropped several notches. There can be no excuses. We ALL knew ffs.

You wont be disappointed then

Keep in mind....most of the rest of media DON'T want to print the truth...why would they go looking for it...fanboy-phobia

Basis ? I know he's compromised. I know whats his likely fate. Caveat emptor Mfc>fail

Yes he has

Thanks for sharing

They calculated wrong....obviously not too good with maths Left out a fundamential variable

dot....dot, dot...........dot dot sot !!!

A truly double edged sword if ever .

When Milkshake is banned. If Goody proves a baddy, well the club can just deal with it. If they've been stupid enough to bring this upon themselves/ourselves then they can bloody well fix it. I think in some ways the club has fallen into footy groupthink about this. The AFL is about to be taught a long overdue lesson. Can't wait for the chorus of indignation to rise from their bleeding hearts. I can hear however the warbling of the Fat Lady warming up. It's curtains for Essendon...and their numnut players. More fool us. The excuses should prove entertaining at least

This whole saga reminds of those films where the murderous felons think they have got away with their heinous deed. That body will never be found , all wrapped up and weighted down. Then one day a hiker....the inquisitive type...notices something odd caught by a branch. And then it all unravels from there... Camera.....action !!! (Popcorn )

couldnt give a rats about Milkshake. Never expected him to play in 2016 ( at least ) anyway

I, like you ( and no doubt other interested observers ) will be very interested to see how this particular aspect plays out.

The AFL tribunal missed nothing. More the point it didn't go looking !! I know certain folk who visit these boards have knowledge of some of the 3 wise ones. Id be asking them over that single malt... what gives !!

I would think it puts the club in the sights for some penalties....and not the AFL type. Remember. . ASADA hasn't gone after the club......yet

Yes ...two can play this game. The worm has turned.

Exactly.

If WADA don't win....might as well open up all the pharmacies and have open slather... There will be no fairness ever again. This is a line in the sand...big time. As to what lawyers etc say...who gives a f....many are on the side of those keeping this farce going. Look at this Swaab mob.. Theyre lawyers...and that article was 100% crap....well 97% ..some facts in there.' You know...a lot of layers, solicitors, barristers....LOSE their bloody cases..Their word is not gospel.. Its often topical.. I know some legals who are astounded at the poor advice to date ( to the AFL and EFC ) . Their's is just another viewpoint. In the very unlikely event CAS doesn't uphold the WADA code.. then that will be it I expect CAS WILL find for WADA. ..because there is a Santa !!

Maybe its just Swaab's vibe on the whole thing !! As alluded...fanboy propaganda.

I got it

"At this stage, it appears that WADA has made a high-stakes bet for what appears to be very little return " Really ?? LITTLE ?? A humorous irony there in itself , but would hardly describe the Integrity of Sport as be a 'little return !! Only a fanboy would write anything so inept. How are SWAAB connected to Essendon I wonder ? And for their benefit obviously an outside non biased entity has to be the ones to arbitrate as this particular code has show itself incapable of doing so without foregoing any consideration to either it's commercial interests or persuasive stakeholders