beelzebub

Mentioned something similar on another thread. Totally agree. Would bring an interesting element to the position.

I didn't say Kent couldn't. I simply said i didn't think BOTH could The next 3 weeks might not be the happiest.

We do know why he ( Kent ) was dropped. Not executing the Goody mantra. That's paramount . Thats why Jack was chastised. Actually IT IS only about wins.. the subplot is how you achieve it. This isnt about theatre; not about entertainment it's ONLY ever been about winning games. Perhaps this is actually lost on some. I disagree entirely that both these players offer something. Thats been the spine of much frustration. As to the next 4 weeks... every chance we might not lose one. I'll leave it to you to figure out the cryptic nature of that

carn Dees Lets get serious about this. Get streetsmart before the other lot do. Must be some plum jobs for the girls

come back Tayla....all is forgiven

without dount there's some "inaccuracies" but over all it describes us fairly well. Certainly one of the best overall analysis by anyone in the media

Have a sneaking suspicion the club might just do exactly that

Other Jack got 2 games .... be surprised if this one doesnt get that. Yeah I know...no 100 there ( as such ) but how have we all forgotten how good he was. Hes doing all the right things in the magoos..............

well, its a much better refurbished lift. The UP button is green and lit.... Not sure i see much otherwise, just yet

Maybe not the lock we'd all be first inclined to believe. JJ 'still negotiating" well manager is by all accounts. The Bullies have like all some money to burn soon but at same time have to cast an eye to bettering the list. If as they say you might have to give to get then someones not getting a seat on the bus. I reckon this might play out for quite a whiles before we actually know whether he is , or not, on the market ( for real) What strikes me is the deal COULD have already been inked away by now. So who's really the staller ?

excuse me..this is a forum where opinions are voiced. you asked a question..I gave an answer You invited a perspective .That it doesnt wear with you is up to you. What you read or take in is up to you You dont make rules. No one does ( other than the mods of course..lol ) Maybe you can put 90% of dland on ignore mate Here we go , just for you. Well maybe anyone else who has passing interests . Jay Kennedy Harris v Kent Kennedy is a player who requires anothers play to instigate anything. He seldom gets to an advantageous position. Can, does on a few occasions but emphasis on the word ..SELDOM. He's reactive. There may well be a call for that quality and it may well suit some of what Goodwin is trying to instigate.but whilst at times has shown a willingness to create "pressure acts" against his opposite number it in reality smacks of being second to anything. When he first came to the scene he had a little bit of a spark about him. Either the battery's flat of it got trained out of him. Either way as a forward he plays like a slow pack pocket. I just don't understand why you ever have that near the sticks. It seems counter intuitive to the job at hand, which for any team, especially a forward is to add to the scoreboard as that is how the games won. Dean Kent. Where as JKH probably takes his job guide too literally Kent probably doesnt pay to much heed to it as he is a 'natural " player who nearly 99% of times seems to follow his instinct. This trait whilst scintilating to watch when on song will incur the coaches ( and everyone's ) wrath when the mojo has gone. What Kent will do though is if possible be first to the ball. His first instinct is to attack, not defend. For mine this IS what you want in a smaller forward. You want an opportunistic player who might try to connive something from nothing and possibly not worry about what if something goes wrong. That he is now being encouraged to accept that it can indeed go belly up and if youre the freddy responsible (and even if youre not ) you better be just as quick in snuffing it out as you are to cause it. Kent is therefor high risk higher possible outcome . Harris is a dowdy lower risk for little outcome. Going back to simple, well what is the actual aim of the forward line. What MUST be its priority ? The game is won by the team with the highest score. Thats not purely simplistic it's the only relevant fact about the game. High score wins.No extenuations apply. You have to then surely build a team which can score. Kent to me ticks far more boxes than Harris

can you gift wrap to go

In the spirit of simplicity: Win a Premiership. Thats about the long and short of it.

Nails it. Brilliant analysis. MELBOURNE..the mighty Couldabeens !!

Miserably. Hope he learns

I think there's a fair argument to be made that we actually did LOSE it in the 1st qtr

Lets hold hands everyone

Who didn't turn up to play ?? Hmm first qtr....be about 18 at a time lol

Quite possibly. However when opportunity knocks....

a joy to watch...Come back Bernie ( the real one ) Love the troops rallying.. Some real spirit...where's it gone ?

I agree ( we can you know...lol ) seriously though... I agree. Think I know exactly what you're on about ( god forbid these assumptions )

so in your mind only someone who coughs up regardless year after year is a valid supporter of the club ? I know you will say yes. ( my assumption ) Who knows his situation. Financial ability not with everyone, all the time

because we have that hbf possie all fixed right now ?

now that is your opinion

again..he stated he had been off and on over many years