Jump to content

whatwhat say what

Life Member
  • Posts

    16,338
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by whatwhat say what

  1. paramount deal meant moving away from c7 which was a no-no as afl, rightly, has no faith in paramount-cbs existing as a fta property via ch 10 post 2030, with them expecting to exit this territory due to them being, well, pretty broke amazon have no interesting in small domestic sports like afl and nrl
  2. what a cross with a striker in the box to knock it home
  3. he doesn't even play for us and he's already got two different ways to spell his name, neither correct great grab
  4. that's not very mfcss of you when things are glum there's worse to come!
  5. 70% of the broadcast rights for both comes from news corp, broadcast on foxtel with foxtel being sold off to a private equity firm - the one that stripped sensis to the bone then sold it for parts - the rivers of gold for broadcast rights could well stop post 2031 7 and 9 are broke, and will 10 survive?
  6. nathan williamson remains an atrocious maggot
  7. girls have dropped their bundle as much as maggots love flagmantle
  8. this survey is purely data harvesting
  9. missed the first half that late goldrick goal from a dodgy free and 50 was pretty important
  10. he's a very good coach 2 premierships in 13 completed seasons is nothing to sneeze at, and a very good chance of going 3 in 14 i think their home ground advantage has dissipated post-covid seasons i envy their ability to have 100% ownership of their advertising at their taxpayer-funded stadium there's always been rumours regarding farms and cotton on franchises; how much of that is true is impossible to know their management of scandals is second to none
  11. no stone left unturned but alas no sods neither
  12. head office memo's finally got thru
  13. pear need a goal cos bloods feel well on top
  14. they've nearly all been there imo
  15. grundy getting a pantsing
  16. game definitely being played to pear's style at the moment
  17. i don't think nuffie is a pejorative is it? i 100% consider myself one! and everyone on here...only nuffies would be this engaged
  18. another example of them showing that they are exploring every opportunity that they can
  19. first two years under pert were to try and get us closer to the mcg - was a bust, but at least they tried, including going through a process and getting knocked back caulfield has been in train for the last two years, and it's another throw at the stumps but at least we can clearly see that the board is trying everything to make it happen you've said you don't trust the board; cool, i guess i am giving the benefit of the doubt as they have - from what i can determine - been pretty clear in their aims and outcomes and timelines around trying to get us a home base for the duration of the time since ol mate out west, jackson, and roos were parachuted into the club first step was casey (win), next was yarra park (fail), third is caulfield (we'll see) arguably, we're closer to something actually happening than we've ever been since 1964 i see that as a good thing rather than a bad one, which to me says that - despite massive issues amongst themselves, clearly - the board and administration have worked as best as they can to actually make it happen i look at the prospect of a base at caulfield and a satellite site at casey to accommodate our four sides as a massive win that should give us a leg up in the competition for years to come i hope it happens; you expect it won't i couldn't deal with being that negative about something that i, ultimately, have no control over
  20. but i don't understand why you expected it to be any different they said this time last year the feasibility study was expected to take the majority of the 2024 year an announcement has now been made of next steps the way you automatically assume the worst outcome is mfcss to which i can only aspire; i'm not that hardwired to negativity i say 'we'll see' i have hope, which i think as a football fan is what you want, rather than going full hanrahan - "we'll all be rooned!"
  21. holes? as opposed to the 'not what i'm hearing' from 3aw? hearing from..? this was always going to the process - the notion that it's 'had holes picked within it within 12 hours' and that releasing it has 'bought [someone] a year' is such a negative way of looking at the announcement mfcss manifest, indeed
  22. if noble was a non-event then there's no way that he'd be getting a 4-5 year deal at gc17 and the filth would be demanding pick 12 for him as an opening gambit speedy half-backs who can hit targets = the new inside bulls; every team wants two of em
  23. hanrahan's "we'll all be rooned!"
×
×
  • Create New...