daisycutter

nice one ds we could then argue about combining jack and john

hmmmm what about theox......2000-2002 though was the tail end of his career

good work can you do it for first-names?..................i'll go for john

a good one would be what has been the most popular surname in the vfl/afl i'm guessing smith would be right up there

gary ablett and gary ablett

had to laugh at tgr's constant reference to "we" when referring to mfc supporters what i don't understand is how such an obvious and boring troll is still allowed to post

agree.........but getting coaches to agree will be difficult

problem with 16 a side is coaches will use it as an excuse for even more interchanges

1. nope....dogs brekkie 2. good one 3. yep, except backwards pass in attacking 50 should be ok (imagine stuck on boundary line near behind post.) 4. good one, overdue 5. minor infractions should be the old 15m (maybe 25m) , 50m for more serious 6. drop nominated ruckmen rubbish .... still just 1 per team but anyone 7. stricter interpretation of holding the ball (reduce time) 8. quicker ball-up in scrimmages as it used to be (reduce ugly maul)

he could certainly enthral and dazzle you one minute and frustrate the bejeezus out of you the next he certainly didn't fit the usual mould, but then neither did gablett-snr

well, .....thought i'd better reply...... but now can't remember what i was going to say

i think the loss of sunday football (including tv) to the afl was the nail in the coffin

we could have a most forgettable 100 games player quiz?

the special mfc branded sneakers are $160 - 40% = $96

oh c'mon......proportionality please

ht, i have no idea on the veracity of this report in the washington examiner. sorry, but you are just dissing it using a tenuous red herring argument and an ad hominen one at that...... either address the posted issue or ignore it

whorethorn can have him we're already carrying too many wounded

not unusual at all jim, you're just scaremongering. it's easy to postulate disaster scenarios (and there will be many because of cv19 many (most) businesses run on a line of credit. if their revenue drops dramatically (cash flow) they are in deep doodoo. having said that the afl have been throwing money around like a drunken sailor for a long time whilst simultaneously screwing grass roots footy. i have little sympathy for their excesses as an organization. unfortunately it hits the clubs and supporters heavily

given the right development and culture i think he could become a 200 gamer

i'm tending to thinking the same. any games this year will seem unnatural, unsatisfactory and uninteresting, and more to do with money than football. i'd rather watch classic replays.

interesting, the ooze way out in front on votes yet big majority of those who comment say tj

have you tried sleeping 24 hours.........

semantics dd...... it's obvious they mean 1200 have tested +ve as of now with 480 active now. ....you're beating yourself up over nothing

no doubt it's very complex dj, globalisation has its good side and its bad ugly side

yes red, your brevity is simply staggering