Everything posted by RickyJ45
- POSTGAME: Rd 01 vs GWS
-
Welcome to Demonland: Lego
Det er virklige godt nyheder!
-
Neale Daniher ~ Australian of the Year
Well Done Neale! Good to feel good about Australia day for a change...
-
Pre-season 2025
I realise Caleb is still a bit green but can we shut up about culture already?!? Apparently this is our goal now... 🥴🤔
-
Brad Green
The Green Transition is all about Net Zero Moron Media influence, De-Barretization, and switching to future fuels not containing tropane alkaloids
-
NON-MFC: Round 24
higgins delivers... look n learn at the spirit
- PREGAME: Rd 24 vs Collingwood
-
NON-MFC: Round 23
Brissy always have been pretenders when it counts... pity we always seem to play them into form...
-
NON-MFC: Round 23
wow! missy higgins not living up to his name...
-
NON-MFC: Round 22
Acting like a sore loser even though hes always a winner, "umps don't always get it right"
- PREGAME: Rd 22 vs Port Adelaide
-
POSTGAME: Rd 19 vs Fremantle
What I don't get is the Clint Eastwood mantra "know your limitations" is applied to Fullerton but nobody else or the team structure, particularly defence when we are down in few key areas. We knew we had no ruck, light-on in mids dept and were likely to get touched up again here just like in Alice .. unless we did something differently. Clearly the Defence needed to play more man on man but unfortunately reverted to the Darcy Moore million dollar gambler style. The easy goals out the back where unacceptable ffs with the quality of May and Lever... if they had stuck on their men. Stack the backline and play a different structure next time with Freo or similar teams who will out muscle in the center or when we loose momentum. Even matthew lloyd could see this, so why can't see the coaching panel see it? We can't play like rockstars when we haven't got the engine. I hope we learn now from the same mistake (x2) and stopping playing like Darcy Moore...in D when we are not winning the ball. Can't we just clog the game up?
-
Yze gets the Tigers Coaching Job
this year keeps keeping on... what"£%)*^$£")*"%£$)^*
-
POSTGAME: SF vs Carlton
Really shattered for the club after all the good and hard work. So close and win in so many areas but not the forward 50. Only positive is that our injured eg melks and angus wont be put through torture if we were premiers... We were robbed tonight after leading most of the game. enjoy your summer!!!
- GAMEDAY: SF vs Carlton
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
If we can't shut this thread down can we at least change the title to past tense? No one agrees with what happened, and there are other things to focus on. La vendetta è un piatto che va servito freddo.
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
Shocked by the decision, I expected him to get 3 weeks then Pies to appeal and him to get off. AFL should appeal if they are serious, but probably wont because they aren't. What is complete baloney is the following : "As for a bump, the panel found that Maynard did not attempt to bump Brayshaw. “In order for it to be concluded that he engaged in the act of bumping,” Gleeson said. “It would be necessary to find that he formed that intention when in midair at approximately at the apex of his leap." He formed the intention to bump immediately when he ran at him and before the jump.... But they persist on interpreting his actions as that of an angel...maybe we should que up for the holy blessing?? GAGF Gleeson Sniping lives on and Lloyd and Cornes are its protectors. Great for football, not.
-
This ‘Premiership era’ wasted inside 50
In case you missed it...
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
you don't need to...it has been well documented his early game "intensity" is a barometer for collingwood's performances in the media, by the same people who are now protecting him... we should have had someone on him tbh but that is another thing....he runs straight lines at players and the ball is a secondary consideration ..."blind freddy" incl. Mcguire knows this... there is just a media windup of past players protecting their own legacies, pathetic un-principled hypocritical hangers-on like barrett, and collingwood media influencers stirring the pot which is annoying
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
Kane Cornes ( an admitted shock jock and fan of the negative football - which aligns with his unimaginative and limited, yet allegedly disciplined skill set) ranted against Manynard's suspension and his main points were ... -we are asking too much of our players, we want intense finals footy, so we should shutup when accidents happen - there was nothing else he could have done. what do you want him to do? he cant disappear into mid air... - (And my favorite) If anyone questions this > how much footy have you played yourself? you don't know what your talking about and should shutup... - He refers to the Tom Lynch bump earlier in the year as precedence. but this was much different, tom was in a pack, they were all contesting the ball, and the hit was not as bad... even for this hit, interesting that Bucks (one of the few prominent outliers here) thought it should go to the tribunal as he did for the maynard case... https://www.sen.com.au/news/2023/04/11/why-buckley-disagrees-with-afl-tribunals-lynch-call/ Can't really see how kane has got maynard off : - forgets the ongoing head injuries law suits and general trend to protect the heads - ignores the fact that it was a dog act by maynard, not a footy act, which is the popular euphemism these days for a dog act... - and yes forgets how maynard lined gus up as much as an A380 coming into to land at tullamarine - general condescending remarks about those holding the opposing view perfectly exemplifies just how out of touch he is to the issue and how he needs to "play the man" and not the substance, to win an argument (just like he did in his playing days, to moderate success). 3+ weeks thanks!
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
you have a duty of care to yourself when you listen to them and to anyone else when you repeat what they say...
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
haha love the not so subtle PC drive-by on your way out... Head injuries awareness is new but it is real and here to stay... this is to all players' benefit
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
Maynard is known for running straight lines and is also well known for a chronic shoulder condition. He dropped his shoulder to protect himself and would repeat that reaction again under the same circumstances... that is why it in total, the incident was a pre-meditated action, -- the line up on gus, not deviating from his line, and forget the player and his head and hit him after by dropping shoulder... all worthy of 3+ week sanction...
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
Nah times have changed mate, 10 years is a long time in afl , and roughness requires more discretion now. It wasnt fractions of a seconds btw... it was a tee off....
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
thats purely a show for the MRO to prove there was no malice.... malice or not, footy act or not - as Goody said, the facts speak for themselves and it was intended or recklessly careless as a minimum dont be swayed by the crocodile tears