KozzyCan

I would. 14 would end up being pick 20ish in a shallow draft. A future first would also not be crash hot if you think Adelaide are going to finish in a similar position next year. In recent years our picks in the teens have gotten us Tholstrup, Jefferson and Laurie.

Plenty of foodies on the Gold Coast.

If his skills were a bit better he'd be a genuine gun.

Get the vibe he's a bit of an introvert.

Was Langford even there?

Oliver is the exact kind of player the Umpires love to give votes to.

The reports have been that both parties are open to a trade but that Trac isn't demanding a move in the same way as last year. i.e. would be comfortable to stay if nothing gets done. Seems like both parties are approaching this pretty maturely.

I don't get this. He could easily play five more years and be the difference between winning a flag or not. Picks are lottery tickets for players that take years to develop even if you find a good one. A team like Adelaide should be in total win now mode. We should also not be trading Trac unless we get overs since the club has made it very clear we expect to be playing finals next year.

The etiquette for a while has been to not annouce the coach until the team they are working with finishes their campaign. We just called up Geelong and worked it out maturely in advance instead. Really not an issue whatsoever.

The panel we selected showed we were more interested in finding someone who was a strong managerial presence who could take ownership of the whole football program rather than just being a good tactician or whatever.

Also helps that there is bugger all to do in Geelong.

Wasn't it Daniher who campaigned for it? Remember him speaking very strongly about Ruckmen smashing their knees together.

Adelaide won't be moving anyone decent on to get Trac in, but we won't accept their picks alone. Most likely we'll see some convoluted multi-club trade get it done.

In my experience they are some of the most relaxed and confident footy fans I've met. They rival Hawthorn supporters in that department. Losing a prelim doesn't hurt so bad when you can be 90% sure you'll be thereabouts the following year. Collingwood supporters would be closer to the description you provided because of how many Grand Finals they've lost over the decades.

Haven't met many Cats supporters?

Eh, they can get other clubs involved to make it worth our while.

Agree about Trac/Flanders. Not sure where all this Walter talk is coming from. Suns aren't going to let him go.

Goodwin has clearly been talking to the media for some time.

Are we really thinking that May was asked to look around weeks ago and there's no way that info could have gotten out elsewhere? Surely his manager has phoned up a few clubs by now.

Sounds like the AFL basically expected this news? Rockliff has doubled down. It all comes down to the vote, but also wouldn't put it past the AFL to backflip on the stadium. I suspect Buckley was given some assurances...

Dunno the rule they're bringing in is what the AFLW has had for it's entire existence. Think it's worked pretty well.

It's amazing to me that the media can do these mental gymnastics acknowledging King as a good appointment whilst still finding avenues to criticise us, like the panel being wrong or the process being shoddy. Must have been alright if it ended up selecting the right candidate?

Talk about a nightmare blunt rotation.

Mckay for Petracca was the move that should have been done.

Not even from a Melbourne perspective. His manager should really be advising him to re-sign imo. Another team might bring him in and not even have a clear role for him. Better for him to build his craft at the team he's currently best 22 at and establish himself into the comp.