Everything posted by rpfc
-
The New TV and Media Broadcast Deal
Lol. That’s the point. Murdoch will have to pay if you want to pay him to watch the footy. Crowds might go back up again…
-
NON-MFC: Round 6, 2022
That’s abuse of the Queen’s English. Tex should apologise through a video with the Queen awkwardly sitting behind him…
-
TEAMS: Rd 06 vs Richmond
This may be rhetorical but a handful this year. We can carry him against most.
-
TEAMS: Rd 06 vs Richmond
I think if the finals started next week, TMac would be in the team - but they don’t and he is not. Ideal world - we would not have both our key forwards as 30 year olds with long careers behind them. So Sam gets more opportunities to earn a place in this team.
-
TEAMS: Rd 06 vs Richmond
- TEAMS: Rd 06 vs Richmond
No he shouldn’t. He is an established senior player who was a performer in a premiership 6 games ago. I don’t know why you are so obtuse and naive with Brown.- TEAMS: Rd 06 vs Richmond
Maybe he is playing a defined role that he will replicate in the seniors?- TEAMS: Rd 06 vs Richmond
Makes sense to me- TEAMS: Rd 06 vs Richmond
Would you like to bet the motel room you are now living in?- TEAMS: Rd 06 vs Richmond
Yes, let’s wait until then for well thought opinion and also on whether Demonland takes @WERRIDEE’s house as agreed earlier in the week if Brown is playing. But my bet is Andy needs to go and organise the locksmith…- TEAMS: Rd 06 vs Richmond
Yes we do. Lever was out earlier in the season on the quiet and pulled out ‘at the last minute’. We’re a footy club, not saints.- TEAMS: Rd 06 vs Richmond
I doubt that that team is set… although it confusing and it leads one to think that we are playing all three tall fwds.- Farewell Luke Jackson
Yeah, he is signed through to end of 2023.- Farewell Luke Jackson
Not if the price keeps going up- 1st & 3rd Quarter Kings
David King has pointed out that they have 5 mids who dominate the time in the middle. So that may be a depth issue or a ‘hardening’ and ‘resilience’ tactic but it means that fatigue from Walsh, Cripps, Kennedy, Hewett, pittonet, and Cerra will arrive more than most teams - especially when not used to that workload. We have 3 that have played 80% or more in the middle which I would guess to be CP5, CO13, and JV7 - hardened stars.- Exclusive down the ground vision
Lol. Secrets given to the masses?? The other clubs have the vision.- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
They should be professional and that is a seperate issue. The ‘emotions of an umpire’ is a bit rich, it’s how they subjectively see something and that is what a blanket ‘demonstrative dissent’ rule seeks to ameliorate. If you throw your arms out after a decision has been made by an umpire - you are pinged or a 50m is applied. This removes the subjectiveness (and the emotions).- Low Attendance
There are only rusted on supporters on this site, and that is evidenced by your patronage during the Neeld years. This was not meant for individual criticism (especially for those on this site) but collective reflection. Crowds are down and I thought we would weather it through our generational team. Alas not.- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
Aren’t they all ‘to be interpreted’? And, again, appealing is different because they are asking the question, not belittling the decision. If an umpire pays a free AND a 50 for appealing then I have little doubt it will be pointed out constantly and clarified for your benefit.- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
That’s not what I have read/heard. Appealing is different to remonstrating, and remonstrating is demonstrating dissent. Umpiring is in an awful state up and down the leagues and something had to be done.- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
I have had coaches say (and have said myself) - “just don’t say anything to the umpires” for yeeaaarrrrrssss… But of course the next thing said was ‘unless you are standing around, then you can quietly whinge like a [censored] in their direction - now get out there and get the footy!!’- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
How do you ‘APPEAL for a free AFTER the decision’? Its just whining to the umpire and if it universally applied then it makes it easier to officiate. If you GESTICULATE, the umpire won’t EQUIVOCATE.- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
Mark Robinson is confused and steadfastly against this rule interpretation. That should be enough for all of us to reflect and see the benefits of the new interpretation and it’s necessity for the game’s future. Just don’t tell the umpire to look at the screen and whine like a little [censored] when you give away a free.- CHANGES: Rd 06 vs Richmond
I just find this a naive stance. 6 games ago he won a flag as an effective FF. You bring back your best players as son as you can. Are we a ruthless club or do we gift games and ‘share’ positions?- Low Attendance
I’m not really following that equation. We had 58k for the Dogs & flag unveiling and low 40s for the Bombers. Those are not good. They’re not pathetic so no thread. Generational team + pathetic crowd - meek excuses = ‘Crying Foul thread’ I really think that sums it up. - TEAMS: Rd 06 vs Richmond