He de mon

i didn't get an email? When was this?

Don Williams 5.10 3/4 😄 Everyone else rounded to a half inch, but not Don. They were a lot smaller in those days.

I am having the same issue with the loop thing. Did you end up getting it to work?

Genuine question. How would you characterise it?

I am curious to know what your association is to the Lawrence ticket? You bleat about transparency and yet you remain silent when asked reasonable questions about your involvement. It isn’t a difficult question to answer.

I find the negativity about this bizarre. We finally have some concrete plans, and things appear to be moving in the right direction. I am not a fan of Caulfield, but if that is the position the clubs takes then I will embrace it. Just give us a home already. Notably the Lawrence fans are still not happy. Can’t campaign on that one anymore hey?

Sure it was an abnormal season. For every single club. The fact is we adapted better than most of the others. What advantage did we have over other clubs in 2021?

I support a review of the board, and the club in general. I may have even been receptive to Deemocracy's ideas, but the actions of Lawrence and his proxies on DL has cemented my belief that he has no interest in what is best for our club.

Agree. Grifters gonna grift.

Given that every thing you have posted since joining, that aint the flex you think it is.

That’s hilarious. It’s like one of those Twitter polls that Trump posted ‘proving’ he won the debate. Comedy gold.

What I am talking about is that there are certain posters whose only contribution to this forum is to bag the board and extol the virtues of Lawrence. It often feels like a ham fisted influence campaign.

The problem is that the Lawrence advocates rarely participate in any other discussion apart from matters concerning the board. It feels like they are campaigning rather than being on Demonland because they love the club, and enjoy talking and reading about the footy.

FFS. Are you ever satisfied Peter?

Why? Because he spent a week at the club?

She joined in 2013. Hmm 2013, a great year for the Dee's wasn't it? Neeld was coach, 2 wins for the season, 32k members, no flag for 49 years. Yeah, much worse.

Nothing like a paper bag to seal the deal.

The Simone Biles of mental gymnastics.

Public utterances are not a sackable offence. I support an independent external review, and any recommendations should be acted upon.

Given it’s a hypothetical, it shouldn’t be that difficult to answer. Sounds like you have already made your mind up, and anything that doesn’t match the narrative won’t be good enough.

So if an external independent review finds that there only needs to be small changes to the board or Operations personnel i.e No one has to resign, will you throw your support behind the incumbents?

So it should be someone who has or had no affiliation with the club?

I am all for an external review of the club, from top to bottom. My question is for the people here who are questioning the board or the coach, or the list mangers etc. If the review finds that only tweaks are needed to get the club on track, without people falling on their swords, will you accept the result?

Well you have the material for next years Round 1 banner. Give it to em please!

Yep. That should help the finances.