Jump to content

Ham

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ham

  1. He'll ask to be traded.
  2. Ham replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I rate this, highly. Also, on the point of Jackson providing, he does a significant amount to help Weid get into the game as well.
  3. Ham replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    COME ON!!!!!
  4. Ham replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Ah [censored]
  5. Ham replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Langdon B&F for Melbourne, hands down.
  6. Ham replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    What in the actual [censored] is this umpiring?
  7. Ham replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Baker being [censored] held!
  8. Ham replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Pure definition of below the knees, nothing.
  9. Ham replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Jetta is so unbelievably cooked. I really want him to stay at the club in an off field role, but his playing days are way past him.
  10. Ham replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    There were 5 that they missed in our forward half in the space of 30 seconds.
  11. Ham replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    What the [censored] is this umpiring? They've cost us multiple goals.
  12. Ham replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Don't buy that at all. He's been listed as the emergency multiple weeks in a row. He needs to be played.
  13. Ham replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Really bewildering how Lockhart isn't playing, yet Jetta is?
  14. Ham replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Shocking selections.
  15. Fair. He was a pretty mundane half back to then a pretty handy half forward. He has fallen off the cliff quite fast.
  16. Ham replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Play bedford Do not play T.Mac
  17. Ham replied to DeePressed's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Bedford is only 2 games in and just needs real clear direction of what his role is. Can he be given that? I'm not sure. Agree with Harmes being rotational, I think he can replace the role of Melksham quite well. The other players (currently listed) who would help fill out those 6 are; Bennell Petty J. Smith (honestly would rather de-listed / traded, but not sure this will happen) Sparrow (mid/forward) Petracca (mid/forward) Viney (mid/forward) So I agree that we definitely need another tall marking target, as I'm not sure Petty is the right body type for that role and I genuinely think they should persist with him as a CHB. We definitely need another mid sized body forward as well, to replace the Hannan role. Who do we target? Daniher, Finlayson? Unfortunately I don't think there is a great choice for us out there, but beggars can't be choosers.
  18. How does the hit against Hunt not get recognised with a suspension? Was late, high and careless.
  19. Gawn, Trac, Hibberd, Jetta, Melksham just off the top of my head.
  20. Ham replied to DeePressed's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I reckon we have the personnel for our forward line, just no consistency in them all playing together. These players shouldn't appear in our forward line again. Melksham T.Mac Preuss Jones Hannan ANB Spargo Hunt Brown C. Wagner Some are capable of playing a forward role, but not in this team (for example Hunt, Hannan, Melksham). Our forward lineup should revolve around these players. Weid Jackson Pickett Fritsch Bedford Harmes 2 talls, 2 mids, 2 smalls, then go from there and fill out the rest.
  21. Ham replied to DeePressed's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    He has the footy nous. The block that he did for Weid in the Adelaide game, was more footy nous than T.Mac has ever shown in that forward line.
  22. Ham replied to DeePressed's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    100% T.Mac needs to be traded at season end, but I would rather see him in CHB in this team than anywhere near the forward line. I think given the amount of experiments we've done this season (Fritsch in back line, May in forward line, O.Mac in forward line, Smith in the back line), I would at least expect a player who has played most his career in the back line, to get another shot and see what he can do with it. Going forward, I see the key backs and forwards like this. FF: Weid (Preuss & Gawn back ups) CHF: Jackson/Petty FB: May (O.Mac backup) CHB: ???/Petty Petty showed a bit last year in the forward line and then this year Jackson showed a bit. Either bring Petty off the bench and play 3 tall forwards and then recruit a CHB, or play Petty in the CHB role (which is what he was drafted to Melbourne to play).
  23. Ham replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    T.Mac in CHB is the absolute best option for him in this side. Lever cannot and should not be playing a key position. O.Mac is a FB, not a CHB, when ever he plays CHB he get's a horrible match up (membrey) and the result may not always be that his opponent scores, but they drag him away from the goals and his height and spoiling ability becomes a useless asset.
  24. Ham replied to DeePressed's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Lever and Hore shouldn't play in the same team, they play the exact same role. Petty/T.Mac in at CHB (this is the position/player we should target this trade season or we train Petty in that role) Lever to pocket.
  25. Ham replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    No changes.