BW511
Members-
Posts
1,605 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by BW511
-
Oliver's stats are not winning us games of football, despite what everyone thinks. See above example
-
Oliver had 25 handballs. Using this game alone, who was more effective; Trac - 25 (13 Kicks 11 handballs and 2.1 Goals - Including one that missed everything when he 'played on') Oliver - 35 (10 Kicks 25 handballs) Tim Watson is not wrong, even with the high numbers Oliver produced. How do people feel about Tom Mitchell from Hawthorn? He wins a mountain of footy but doesn't do any great damage from a game sense.
-
Happy to disagree, but it doesn't mean I don't enjoy him as a player. I think if he were to walk we have others that could cover him (Viney, Sparrow, Gus, Harmes etc) and the currency we would get in return would net us the equivalent player in a position which would better balance our side. If he's as good and irreplaceable as many believe, then we could get almost anyone in the league in - think about that side of the equation
-
This is exactly the point, he’s a very even contributor and gets plenty of attention, but from an opposition point of view he would not be the one they want to stop. I think it would currently be Trac, Gawn, May and/or Lever then Oliver. He was rated our 5th best yesterday in the match report, so even they thought a lot of his 35 touches weren’t great or important. If letting go of Oliver nets us enough picks to bring home a Matt Rowell, I’d be asking where to sign (gotta feel for him right now, poor bugger) If letting go of Oliver got us Josh Kelly or Whitfield, same thing. There’s many more players that could improve our side but even more that could fill his role for zero net loss
-
He’s not our best player and no one in the comp rates our side. Would think there is 6-10 blokes that could do similar work, maybe not at his level but probably 95% which still works
-
He’s a very good player and still young, but he’s replaceable. $800 x 5 should be more than enough cash wise. Think winning would be higher priority
-
I agree with this. We will always have those whole quarter lapses and opposition teams will always believe they are in games regardless of score line when playing us. The way the Tigers share the ball around and hit certain spots from areas of the ground is phenomenal. They are extremely well led on and off field. Initial contest is the focus for us, then after that it is anyone’s guess
-
Reckon this is a chicken/egg type scenario. Melbourne supporters are the way they are because of the club’s history. Success is the number one factor in new membership, whether that’s from the previous generation or the one before that. You could probably also argue that the demographic of Melbourne fans are more likely to have other hobbies, like skiing or visiting their beach houses, as cliche as that is. This means when the performance drops off the supporters interest wanders too. Lot of the traditional Richmond/Carlton/Collingwood/Essendon supporter bases are from lower socioeconomic families and footy is their life
-
Wonder if all those asking for Sparrow to go were at the game or watching from home? He did a lot of good work around the contest and was never far away. I think he’s quite similar to Viney, so would only make way as a like for like? Hunt & Jones were ordinary, but I’d rather not bring in Melksham so happy for Jones to stay. Hibbo can come in for Hint if required
-
I wasn’t there nor do I attend regularly, but think Richmond and Collingwood have 2.5 - 3 times our supporter base so it’s to be expected that they can get a crowd in with limited numbers. If we have 40k members and had 20k turn up, that’s probably about right. I’d also love to see some stats on the age of Melbourne supporters, think there would be a lot in the bracket that are very susceptible to this virus and would be hesitant to attend mass gatherings. Finally, I’d rather watch from home with the ability to do other things than be stuck at the ‘G watching games like that. It was a very ordinary affair
-
This sounds all too familiar
-
I certainly did. Both teams were playing the game at a speed we can't sustain, particularly if we intend on hitting targets.
-
Would be a minor miracle if we got 7 goals from 3 of our forwards. High chance this is a defensive & ugly affair and 10 goals wins it
-
Anyone who thinks the blues are not on the up is kidding themselves. Even if they fold now, they can see they are capable of matching the best. Still feel we are a bit light on for leg speed watching this one
-
How many feathers has Chocco ruffled so far? (Tongue in cheek) Given the big song and dance about finals or bust for Goody, will the board be held accountable too?
-
Reckon we will get more out of Ben Brown in 5 games than T-Mac in 18
-
I don’t necessarily think we’ll be that bad, just believe we don’t have enough firepower across the ground. I mentioned in the other thread, if we are less than 3-2 after 5, it will get very difficult for Goody
-
10 or under, sorry
-
I think we are 9-10
-
Premier: Brisbane Runner-up: Richmond Wooden spoon: North Moving up: Gold Coast Set to fall: Collingwood Brownlow Medal: Jack Steele Coleman Medal: Tom Hawkins NAB AFL Rising Star: Matt Rowell Best new Demon: Big Benny Brown Demon All Australian: May/Gawn Demon B&F: May Big call: Jack Viney plays under 10 games (again) Ladder prediction: 1. Brisbane 2. Richmond 3. Port Adelaide 4. Western Bulldogs 5. Geelong 6. St Kilda 7. West Coast 8. GWS
-
Quite a few articles now with a similar theme, if the club are pushing this narrative and this hard, it must be quite serious.
-
Mark Maclure "Soft Culture" Comments
BW511 replied to Half forward flank's topic in Melbourne Demons
I haven't been around for the whole 56 years, but I think it's ingrained in the fibre of the club that a switch will just magically flick and we start winning. -
Mark Maclure "Soft Culture" Comments
BW511 replied to Half forward flank's topic in Melbourne Demons
I'd love to share your optimism, as well as being proven wrong and eating humble pie. -
Mark Maclure "Soft Culture" Comments
BW511 replied to Half forward flank's topic in Melbourne Demons
I think the reason we don't get praise for wins is we follow them up with games like the Bulldogs. I find it hard to ever be truly passionate about the Dees, because I can't be guaranteed the club will be passionate/committed enough to consistently win games. If we won or really had a go against the dogs, this place would be buzzing. The only people stopping that happening are the playing group/coaching group. -
This is bizarre, no one in their right mind would believe this to eventuate.