Jump to content

adonski

Members

Everything posted by adonski

  1. adonski replied to Bates Mate's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Don't mind it. They seemed to usually work out okay.
  2. Brown's gotta come in to protect JVR and/or Petty Not sure only 2 key defenders is sustainable Great game by Viney Very odd coaching to have Gawn ruck to majority of the game when we needed a seasoned body up forward
  3. 6. Viney 5. Oliver 4. Gawn 3. Hibberd 2. Langdon 1. JVR
  4. No Brown a weird decision then & seems stranger now Bowey & McVee in the same backline a bit of an issue given their inexperience, need Salem back asap
  5. adonski replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
  6. https://www.codesports.com.au/afl/trade-hq/afl-pushing-for-players-to-be-traded-against-their-will-in-major-shakeup-to-player-movement/news-story/2d0ec95d26c0f8fa88f9132d44a64bbd The AFL’s superstars would be traded against their will NBA-style under a radical proposal raised by the league as part of its pay talks with the AFL Players’ Association. And the league has for the first time officially asked the AFLPA to consider a mid-season trade period under the next collective bargaining agreement to help increase player movement across clubs. AFLPA boss Paul Marsh on Monday told the Herald Sun the players and the player union were firmly against any proposal to trade players against their will. “They want to reduce player freedom contracts and take away choice of movement and they want us to fund past player liabilities,” Marsh said. “They put some conditions around that (trading players) – players would have to be earning a certain amount to be able to be traded without consent. Marsh said “certain coaches” supported the AFL’s proposal to move players without their consent – but the AFLPA’s position was that forcefully relocating players and their families was off limits.
  7. adonski replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Might be worth the punt for a nothing pick now 🤷‍♂️
  8. Fierce debate over which draft prospect they like better @ pick 50
  9. North & WCE I could imagine being open to splitting their first pick (assuming it isn't pick 1)
  10. I didn't watch the game but is the assessment on Brown a bit over the top? If he kicked straight he'd have his usual 3 or 4 goals. Was he that poor? I'm surprised they didn't bring him back immediately, I thought his start to the year has been pretty pleasing.
  11. We'll be on the backpage of the New York Times next
  12. Any reason Harmes or Jordon can't play the same role, players who win more of the pill perhaps Their endurance levels are more than adequate to cover Sparrow's relentless running for 65% time on ground
  13. adonski replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Depends how Brown/McDonald finish the year
  14. Wonder if the Eagles would be keen to split pick 1, like they split pick 2 last year....
  15. Sam van Rooyen with Freo's (our) 2nd rounder 🤞
  16. adonski replied to picket fence's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Spargo to play as a distributor out of half back Salem to role through the midfield to add a touch of class Bowey on a wing
  17. Jacko was poorly advised to move back, I feel a bit for him to be honest
  18. Jacko is getting less ruck time than with us
  19. Dokkas are a Serong hamstring away from being a wooden spoon threat