Mel Bourne

“I’m very charismatic”, lol Well young man, do feel free to woo us all!

Hmmm… There are a couple of different “shrugs” that we often see; one is designed to slip into a high-tackle penalty, the other is a genuine attempt to break the tackle. If the latter is at play, and manages to quickly and effectively break the tackle, are we good to play on?

Yes, that’s the intention and if it manages to eliminate the “duck-shrug” I’m all for it. But It’s the quality and consistency of adjudication I’m concerned about.

I bet the shrug-means-prior rule won’t have you saying “meh” when it costs us a game. That one is going to be a total schmozzle.

Thoughts on these? Shrugging In The Tackle is going to be a highly controversial (and I predict, poorly adjudicated) one. The doubling-down of the stand rule is nuts. I’m ok with ruck nominations being scrapped and somewhat welcoming of the last-touch rule.

GOALSQUARE STARTING POSITIONWhile the 6-6-6 rule will remain from centre ball-ups, there will no longer be a requirement for at least one player per team to start in the goalsquare. This will be a measure to help reduce dead time after goals. Last season, the AFL's findings discovered that the goalsquare was the last remaining facet of 6-6-6 to be organised at 10 per cent of all post-goal restarts. On average, that delayed the game by 8-10 seconds per instance. The League subsequently expects the total time saved through this rule change will be around 20-30 seconds per match. LAST DISPOSALA free kick will now be awarded when the ball crosses the line from a disposal between the arcs, bringing the men's game in line with the AFLW's 'lasso' rule. It will operate similar to SANFL in the sense that if a player blocks an opponent or doesn't play the ball before it crosses the line, a normal boundary throw-in will occur instead of a last disposal free kick. In the 2025 season, the AFL's findings discovered that there were 20 boundary throw-ins paid between the arcs and 0.5 insufficient intent free kicks paid between the arcs per game. The League then adapted those numbers for a scenario where the last disposal rule had been introduced. Its adapted numbers showed boundary throw-ins would be reduced by three per game, while 0.3 current insufficient intent free kicks would be negated by a last disposal free kick. The adapted numbers also showed that there would have been an average of 3.25 last disposal free kicks per game paid across the 2025 season. The query from club land has been whether a last disposal rule would kill the ruck. However, there still would have been 67 stoppages per game on average in 2025 based on the adapted numbers. That would have brought it back in line with the AFL's 2023 and 2024 averages. CENTRE BALL-UP CONTESTSAt all centre ball-ups, competing rucks will now be unable to cross the centre line before engaging with their opposition ruck. This is born from a desire to see the jumping rucks return to the game. The AFL has said this rule would not have been possible without the end of the 'centre bounce', as opposed to the 'centre ball-up', due to the variables of which direction the ball can go from a bounce. The ball-up also gives the umpire extra time and ability to assess where the ruck is stationed when he engages his opponent. The AFL's findings discovered that only 21 per cent of centre bounce ruck contests had at least one ruck jumping in the 2025 season. In 2023, just two years ago, that number was at 63 per cent. There will still be an opportunity for the more physical wrestling rucks to impact the game at around-the-ground stoppages and boundary throw-ins. ALIGN KICK-IN TIME Umpires currently allow 'reasonable time' for a kick-in, which is deemed at around 12 seconds. However, 'reasonable time' for a mark or free kick paid around the ground is deemed at eight seconds. From 2026 onwards, both of these will align to be eight seconds. The AFL sampled more than 1200 kick-ins across the 2025 season, with a quarter of those lasting longer than 10 seconds and 13 per cent lasting longer than 12 seconds. There was an average of 21 kick-ins taken per game across the 2025 season. If a quarter of those are reduced by four or five seconds, the League is conservatively hoping that around 21 seconds of match length is knocked off through kick-ins alone. RUCK NOMINATIONSUmpires can now restart play without a nominated ruck being present, bringing the men's game in line with AFLW rules. If there is no nomination, or the nominated ruck is too far away, the play will be restarted immediately. The 'third-man up' is still outlawed, so if no rucks nominate – or if the two nominated rucks are too far away when play is restarted – the ball will be thrown up and will have to hit the ground before 'play on' is called. The AFL discovered that there were on average four ball-ups and six boundary throw-ins per game last season with a delay due to the umpire waiting for nominated rucks to arrive at a contest before restarting the play. It contributed to an average of three and a half seconds worth of delay on ball-ups and around one second worth of delay on boundary throw-ins. One particular example from St Kilda's victory over Melbourne late in the year saw two rucks nominate for a boundary throw-in on the opposite wing, despite only just returning to the field of play from the bench. The umpire waited more than 25 seconds for the two rucks to arrive at the contest, before restarting the play. SHRUGGING IN THE TACKLEA shrug in a tackle will now be deemed prior opportunity. It will be similar to how a fend, or an attempt to evade a tackle is deemed prior opportunity. It's hoped this will stop players from contributing to a high tackle, while making the rule easier to adjudicate for umpires. STANDThere will be a stronger enforcement of players being told to 'stand' if they are inside the protected area. Now, if you are within 5m of a mark or a free kick when it is paid, deemed the protected area, you will be required to 'stand' and can no longer reverse to being 'outside five'. The AFL found that more and more players have left the protected area to stand 'outside five' across the last season. In 2025 alone, the AFL's findings discovered that only 58 per cent of opposition players would 'stand' when told while 18 per cent of players went to the area deemed 'outside five' by the umpire. It's hoped this will see more players take the game on, encourage overlapping possessions and more free-flowing ball movement

This was all too real a read.

Can this actually happen? Surely we don’t have what WC/Richmond need to make any kind of deal?

Yikes, Claz is making his eagerness to bro-down with JUH very public now(instagram). Best of luck with that GWS 😬

I don’t want to put the boot in - coaching an AFL team in the current era would be hugely demanding. Not only for the obvious reasons, but coaches are also dealing with young minds during a mental health epidemic. I’m confident that Goodwin was doing his best to deal with the various issues between players, but it was just too tall an order for him. The need for AFL teams to have their mental-health programs in order is rising exponentially. These players are just as addicted to their phones as anyone, and they’re constantly reading all kinds of opinions on their performances and their general behaviour. They are deeply susceptible to depression and anxiety (and the subsequent “acting out” that can come with it), and it takes a lot of expertise and emotional intelligence to guide an entire group through such an environment. Maybe the messaging has always been wrong with Clarry, or maybe he was just unreachable, but I hope King and his crew are able to create an environment that brings out the best in our players and encourages them to actually want to be “demons for life”. The recent trades of our stars have been a deeply disappointing demonstration of how important that is

It’s obvious now that Goodwin was not equipped to handle the cultural issues at the club.

Well it’s just an observation, ‘innit. Nothing in the press, nothing on any other social media but a helluva lot here. I’m genuinely curious if this is the biggest shadow-jump we’ve ever had here.

130 pages of nothing. Must be some kind of Demonland record, no?

As someone with older relatives who discovered GIFS two years ago, and think that every one they send me deserves some kind of response/reaction, this thread has become a quiet torture.

It’s good in that it’s “not bad”, and it calls for cautious optimism. Excitement? That a talented young player is currently giving us a sideways glance? It has just a tad of “OMG the hot girl in class knows I exist”. I can tell you though, I will be very excited if he signs!

@Dannyz The operative term here is “hard evidence”. You’re confusing your intel with public knowledge.

Please tell me if I’m wrong, but the only hard evidence of a “link” so far is a blurry photo taken from a car.

True. But is that an observation of the draft, or of our list?

This needs to happen. With May gone, Lever often in the wars, Rivers potentially being used more often in the midfield, Salem entering his 30s and Petty being…whatever Petty is, why would we not make this happen as part of the Clarry deal?

Well that was a fairly irritating five pages of nothing.

In unrelated news I just walked past Ed Langdon. I think it was Ed Langdon anyway (it happened pretty fast). I called out behind him “Love ya Ed!” I hope it was him, or at the very least, the dude’s name was Ed.

Lol

Did you just write this to….yourself?

Which would tank his trade-capital in ‘27, and his general reputation in the sport. Can’t see it.

Sorry folks, having some tech issues over here. Just need to see if my John Delosa thumbs-down button is working….