Deemania since 56

I'd really like to see Jordan coaching right now - not playing - and so doing at the quarter, half and threequarter-time breaks as well. His marshalling is everything whilst his playing is such an obstacle at this point. He has even lost his footskills to a noticeable extent. But, as an authority and wise footballing asset, he is also almost impeachable.

It was deliberate; a clear-cut rule turned into an 'interpretation' time and again to favour the Squawks. It proved repetitive. In close, on tackles, the Squawks were also allowed to throw the ball, in poor attempts the duplicate the speeds of Clarrie's handball.

Our players are attempting to spread but do so too far in - well inside handball distances - hence the congestion. The radius on both sides/areas should be another 4-7 metres out and outriggers should always be in motion, never static. It must be a habit.

He was generally pathetic.

In form and with improved feeds coming in, both would be awesome and reinforced with a returning opportunist in Hannan.

No, it's the 'bloody' big lug factor.

Thought that was just great, it is one of the things I tend to harp on about and it was executed perfectly. A real highlight from both players, the deliverer and the receiver. Imagine if they had two or three alternative plays of the same nature with dummy leads included to free the zone!

Childish response to a legitimate concern that lingers year in and year out. Two wins for the year is well under par for our Team and its playing stocks so an expression and encouragement for assurance or investment in the short-term future may reduce the stroke count significantly. At any rate, I am delighted with the win today as are many who had earlier concerns of this game. However, one rainbow a successful year does not make and if left as an isolate, the short-term future might well look glum as well. My shame, by the way, is reserved for far weightier matters on occasion and cannot be judged by those pre-occupied with labelling theories. Good night.

Yep, intent and faking such intent is not considered. Actual interference is occurring at a rate very close to zero per game so this rule is absolutely redundant, already. When the offence (as such) does occur, then pay the free -- not in anticipation of a free being appropriate if the line of attack or passage is actually intended to such an extent that it is interference.

The umps did everything to help Whoreform - even break the rules of the game, blatantly - all the way to the half-time break. And, it showed.

No idea, other than word of mouth about his applications. If true, a good get, as we need a big fella with mobility and purpose. Hope we get some information on him rather soon.

(PLEASE): Could someone do an analysis on 65. L. Wale-Buxton after the game. I have heard good things about this fella up North. Gets into it and often unstoppable. Multi-pronged skills outside rucking, as well. Fit and fast. Etc. Cannot get to the game (interstate) and seldom pick up a broadcast in Sth Aust.

Hmmmmm....

Not sure that whinging is the matter at hand. Each of us would be the first to openly celebrate and express our delight with the MFC if we did not have to review, analyse/reflect upon another dismal series of performances in multiple areas of the game of football that we only recently considered 'repaired'. In any case, a fully harmonious organisation on a ride on the merry-go-round is not necessarily a healthy one; reflection and the expression of such interpreted observations is akin to the more universal application of desirable standards - new or old - in that search for utopian progress. We are in another cycle, agreed but at the point where more observations than normal are necessarily communicated.

Best wishes, Dunny. You did some great things, very often, for the MFC and tried your heart out to improve the team in those days.

Sunk. For many reasons.

Interesting summation. End to end, it feels like we won't be terribly pretty. Concurrently, it is a worry that we are all considering the likelihood of turnovers and missed targets at this stage of an 'already'-started season; it begs the question: what have we been doing at training in the larger picture?

I am just interested in how much support these players are expected to provide for OMac, distracting from their core roles and functions, their direct opponents and the Whoreform game plan. If it is again 'full-on', then it will again fail whereby clearances will be strained and intercepted. Good luck, backline. Sounds like recruit footballers being exploited as face-savers.

How bizarre can a training session be, reaching dangerously - whether 'supervised' or not - into the training regimens of footballers for the elusive 'fixes' administered by cranks? It is as bad as drug performance enhancement and for the uninitiated, irresponsible. Whatever was wrong with the aerobic and anaerobic methods tried and tested for the past forty years to raise O2 capacity and lactic acid tolerances? 'Oh,' said the FD, 'let's do something different with this pariah of methodology as it sounds groundbreaking. We are only playing with their wellbeing.'

Jurrah was excellent in a short career, he came and went like lightning - he was so fast! He could run a bit as well - all day. I also think he might have been taller than suspected, over 190 cms but it was well-hidden with his 50kg frame. Overall, yep, monoccular, another forward star outside the physical profiles preferred so often, today. To ram home a point: whaddabout the Wizard, Leigh Matthews, etc., etc.

Keep eyes on Buxton, too. Ready to go ...

Yep. Another good 'un.

He does have an incredible vertical jump - and good hands at this stage of his career. These two qualities can only get better, more refined and more appropriately utilised, no doubt, as experience and good development take shape. It is wise to remember that some of the very good - to - sublime markers and aerialists were not talls, did not run miles onfield, and had limited speed. They didn't even have Dec's physical involvement skills, either, yet proved to be dynamic forwards because of good coaching. Two that come to mind: Tony Modra, 188 cm, 93 kg Warwick Capper, even shorter and much lighter

O'Meara's change in line was due to his awareness of Wagner's closing proximity and speed, and the potential to not get the kick for a goal. Good forward work, good defensive work.

That is a good example of this young fella's abilities. Clearly made up heaps of ground and finished just half a pace from wrecking O'Meara's goal.