Rodney (Balls) Grinter

https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/sport/afl/it-s-d-day-already-for-the-dees-20180426-p4zbud.html Huge moan at bringing up the pre-season camp rubbish again and I think we still have ample opportunity to make finals even should we loose to Essendon, but asides from that, I actually think Carey has got alot right in this article.

He may not have the same tank as ANB, but I would have thought Hannan could be better than Harmes in present form. Hannan has pretty damn good pace and such great/mecurical goal sense, which when we have struggled to convert forward fifty entries, surely that offers something we need at present. Not sure I buy Hannan and Freitch not being able to be played in the same side off such a small sample size we have to date. Asides from that, I agree our proven stocks/depth all of a sudden looks pretty thin, which I think in part is due to the team as a whole being down on coheasion, form and confidence and that the form of Harmes and ANB are symptoms of this broader issue. In this respects I'm not really sure that making bulk changes is really the solution to our problem and that when the side as a whole gets up and about again, guys like Harmes and ANB will get on the end of it and start looking more like world beaters again. On a similar note, I would agree that ANB is down on form, but I do find it amazing how quickly the vibe of Demonland has turned on him from being 'the next big thing' at the end of last year, to being a talentless NQR bottom six player at present. Have faith people - ANB and the MFC will get back to playing bigger and better footy sooner or later.

What do you call what he did last year when Gawn went down? I think most people acknowledge that he was pretty damn good most games. Pehaps that's part of the problem being that he's just not quite good enough for his size and the position he plays compared to others we have that play the same position. Asides from that, I think he was one our better players against Geelong and also competed hard and setup some good goals through good field kicking against the Lions in Rd 2, was then dropped but seems to have been in pretty good VFL form since. As I have stated in another thread I thought there was also a case to get him into the side, just to get some fresh legs in to support Gawn and Hoges off a very short break - hope the fitness department have made the right call there. I still think he is getting dudded over by Weid. As much as I really want Weid to do well, he is really yet to have a break out game a senior level that is the equal of what Pedersen produces on a regular basis. The Weid's best at senior level is about Pedo's worst or average game IMHO and the Weid seems to be the exception to the us selecting based on performance and not gifting games to high draft picks anymore mantra. That said, now that the Weid has been picked in the senior team, I would also like to see him given a decient block of games there to help find his feet at the top level. Also acknowledge that T Mac probably has the inside running on Pedo on this occation also. Assuming T Mac does play, hope the selectors are making the right call here, because as much as I acknowledge T Mac as being an experienced and classy/capable A/B+ player in his position these days, it's a pretty big call to be stepping straight back in after not playing for the best part of 2 months (even then, off the back of an interrupted preseason) and produce at the highest level from the get go. I really hope he does though, because at his best T Mac is a gun that we have sorely missed.

5 goals and BOG in a loosing side. Seriously don't understand why he isn't in the side (or wasn't last game against the Tigs for that matter). Weid still offers way too little other that a hope that he will one day be great. Pedo is the Dean Jones of the MFC.

I'd assume it's partly reactionary atm to address the issue of teams getting a run on too easily and frequently against us. Also due to lack of confidence which has somewhat circumed the team in recient weeks.

Viney comes back into the side and we get Salem playing more of an outside mid role. His our best finisher and ball mover through the middle by far and we need to get him onto moving the ball forward more often.

No doubt, there are some contributing structural issues that need to be addressed, but alot of what I saw on Tuesday night was a Richmond chock full of confidence and a MFC bereft of it. Effort was there on our behalf. They are not that good, we are not that bad. We are also massively missing Viney. Would be great to think that we could take on and beat all comers without key players, but I presently don't think the depth and maturaty of our midfeild is there. I don't think many sides would cope very well having such a key cog out of their team missing either. My observation was that the key period when we got back into the game in the third quarter was when Cotchen had to go off the ground for a period injured. The wave of love and admiration for Dusty and Richmond somewhat astounds me and highights the fickle nature of people and the footy world in general. Go back 18 months or so and the view of much of the footy world was of the view that Dusty was a loose cannon, Richmond should punt him like the Dogs did to Stringer and we did to Watts. No one thought that Richmond were a good side as @Nasher proclaimed at the start of this thread (not having a go personally, but just a obvious example). To me the mission over the next month of footy is to eek out 2 or 3 wins, find some form, team coheasion and be in a good position to attack the back half of the season (which is well and truly not over - yet).

Probably just repeating much of the above again, but: 1. I thought Oscar was supurb. Particulaly that first quarter, he was not only solid defensively, but taking great intercept marks with poise and strength. Looks every bit like maturing into another version if his big brother in this sense. 2. Lever obviously much better. Was said at Adelaide as much of his good performance could be put down to having a strong back six with quality key backs like Talia playing around him. No surprises that good performances from O.Mac and Hibbard corresponds to an improved performance from Lever. 3. It's only Rd 6. With so much of the season left to play, there is still plenty of time to recover form, confidence and correct any tactical and mental issues we may have.

Looking forward to tonight's game and how the team responds. If we come switched on, it's a very winnable game IMHO. Had them on the hop in the corresponding game last year, when we lost both a ruckman and key forward in the first quarter, only just being overrun in the last quarter.

More or less my rationale. Whether resting either Gawn or Hogan directly is really the go, I agree it would be a big call, but I do think the inclusion of Pedo to provide either or both of them with a bit of cover in the likely instance they are extremely fatigued would be a sound move. Weid in the ruck is an unproven quantidy. Pedo appears to be in pretty good form at present thus I think this provides an good opertunity. This would not be about making omissions based on poor performance/result of tonights game. More about smart fatigue management and gaining an advantage on our opponents on Sunday through having fresher legs.

Did he really? I didn't know that (not). My understanding is that he will probably be available for the Dons game, without having played a game in a fortnight - thus "arguably(/effectively) rested". Similar for Freitch. I thought his performance against the Hawks was comparably ok and didn’t really warrant an omission on the basis of his performance - thus "arguably(/effectively) rested".

Jumping the gun perhaps and certainly not conceding a loss tonight to Richmond by any means. However looking forward towards winning the next game only within a 4 1/2 - 5 day break, recalling that last year's equivalent game was a slow, low skill level, dour affair in which both sides (particularly the Dons) looked cooked and out on their feet. Win or loose tonight, I think some strategic team rotations to inject some fresh legs could make all the difference to winning or loosing against Essendon. Here are my entirely speculative thoughts on players to come back in and give us an edge: 1. Cam Pedersen - resting either Gawn or Hogan. In the instance that Hogan is rested, the Pedo still spends more ruck time than normal to give Gawn a chop out; 2. Lewis, Freitch - arguably both rested for this week's game against Richmond. Lewis for Bernie and Freitch for the most tired forward; 3. Corey Maynard - potetentially comes in to rest our most tired or out of form on baller, probably Harms at present; 4. Hannan/Charlie Spargo - potential for Garlett or Patraca; 5. Consider Frost at the expense of one of our backline talls to play on Joe Daniher. The following week, we have a suite of fresh players and potentially T Mac to take on St Kilda, who will be no easy beats at Docklands.

Well the boot studder and the orange boy have also resigned in disgust, so must be something to this suposed rumor.

The positive for me is that our form both as a team and many individuals within the team has been pretty crap for most of the home and away, yet we are still 2 and 2. If we manage to scrape a win out of Richmond/Essendon, then we have a pretty good run of lesser teams ahead after that, then 'should' get back Viney and T Mac, so could turn the half way mark of the season in reasonable shape. I'd rather be comming home strong than starting the season all guns blazing and dying in the ass. With respects to the Hawks game, No goals 7 behinds, 15 goals 2 if you add to that the complete numpty miss by Gawn from 15m out, then it's 1 goal 8 after half time. Shocking conversion by us, unbelievable conversion by them. In more normal circumstances, we kick a fee more and they miss a few and we are still well in the game and putting on scoreboard pressure at 3/4 time and who knows from there...at the very least a far more respectable scoreboard. Whilst that analysis masks the fact that part of the reason for the poor conversion rate was the quality of the enteries and that we hardly looked like scoring at times after quarter time, with Hawthorn controlling thr game, really think this result is being blown out of all proportions. It was after what I regard as one of our worst losses last season (to North I think), that we turned it around and convincingly beat Adelaide in Adelaide last season. Didn't really rate Adelaide last season or this, nor Richmond. We have far from the crap team we did in years gone by and I think sooner or later, we will flick the switch and start beating good sides consistently and pumping poor ones. As for Goodwin, yes I agree that he has been pretty poor tactically at times, but you can't nessasrily place that solely on him - he has a whole box full of assistants to pickup what's going on in that regards tactically on match day and over the weeks, so I don't think that can all be put on him. What I think I like about Goodwin is his drive, high training standards/expectations and mental toughness/calmness that he brings to the role as leader/coach, which I think will pay dividends in time when it counts. It's a long season of perseverance and ours will be defined by what happens over the rest of it, not this one game.

Summed it up pretty well to me. We dominated so much after quarter time, but failed to capitalize quite as much as we really should have, but given the history of things, 4 points is what really matters. ...grandpa LOL

Umpire 26 and the rest of them weren't worthy of officiating at the Humpty Doo under 10s today. They should seriously be demoted for some of that rubbish today.

Sorry, don't get it that people are only just waking up to Wagner. I don't think he's a super fancy sort of player, but in my view he probably played abut as well today as the other games he's played this year. What I like about him is that he's pretty hard at it, tough, seems to move around the ground pretty well and has got decient disposal. I do recall a couple of bad defensive plays he was involved with against Geelong, but just look at how we were letting them move the ball into their attacking 50 that day.

Beating Norf - ABOUT BLOODY TIME

First time I've watched the side at the G in a few years. Just get the FFFING job done Demons.

North can have a try to get into Clarry, but I get the impression that he actually likes the rough stuff, so good luck them. This has to be a real line in the sand moment for the MFC to stand for something. Like the talk from Goodwin in the week, empathizing the need for a win against North, rather than the olf cleché of this just being another game. Would be another psychological monkey off our back to smash this second rate team Nth today, which would mean more than just the 4 points.

I'd be happy if we made no unforced changes for this game. We certainly had under performers against the Lions, but I didn't see any obvious cases of lack of effort/intensity and think there is something to be said for giving players a good opertunity to establish some individual form and stability for the team overall.

They didn't play Daw in Rd 2. He was probably a 4 or 5 goal advantage to us in the JLT game.

Pedo also played that Hawthorn game and in my veiw actually played alot better than Weid. There is a great passage of play where Weid roves a loose ball running through CHF and either delivers deep forward or kicks the goal himself, I don't fully remember. What I do remember is Pedo competing arially crashing a pack for that loose ball to spill to Weid and also the several other big contested marks that Pedo took that day. That game against Adelaide was the benchmark by which Weid should measure himself at AFL level. Unfortunately I also remember him being bog ordanary and meek in our early games last year he was called upon, one being against Geelong (suggestions he was injured, so maybe some reasonable excuse) and I forget the other, but as much as he has played some good games and shown some good signs, there are an equal or more number of games he has highly under delivered at the top level to date. Now that it's all in the past (at the time, I've felt some of his selections over others have cost us games), I'm ok with putting his bad games down to development opertunities, but I really think the selection committee and coaches need to think more carefully about how and when to introduce him back into the side. I definitely see potential in Weid, but I'm fully in the camp of him needing to show consistent form, preferabbly against some quality/big bodied defenders at VFL level before he is reintroduced at AFL level. When he is, we shouldn't be viewing him as a solution to a forwardline deficiency, so I think he plays along side Pedo, T Mac or possibly even both. But when he is selected, providing the required intensity is there, he should be given a decient period of 4 - 6 weeks to properly establish himself at the top level. As an asides, I think people are scared by Lucas Cook story and relating that to Weid. I take a bit of a Paul Roos view on this and who cares what number they were drafted at and which top draft picks go on to have great careers and those who don't is just such a lottery. Even if Weid turns out to be the wrong pick available at No. 9, I'll always be greatfull that our recuitment team saw something special and picked Clarry at 4, because if he wasn't there by our next pick and we missed out, then that would have been a real loss.

Looked at the title and I thought this was going to be a thread about Chris Fagan venting his anger and nearly breaking his hand on the desk last night.

No questions being asked about Bailey's commitment for the contested ball.