biggestred

At least these are impact injuries - not soft tissue ones like the Bombers have.

carlton - because it would shatter masses of bomber fans who thought that they should have been given the premiership back in may before we beat them. i hope they punch the snot out of eachother

must admit i didnt fork out for the same level of membership this year - although i do have a reserved "red" seat and a joint mcc/mfc membership still. dont forget that some good results early next year, even NAB cup will boost membership numbers. of course.....we need to get good results too

the way i see it is that you can approach to talk as long as its non binding - the way i see it geelong would be fine doing what they did! and whats to stop rich clubs just saying, [censored] it we dont care, heres 100k and here is your man in our jumper

Self inflicted of course

lol "groin soreness" i get that most nights

gives everything - no complaints from me.

amazing

no problem with this - club has come from an untenable position financially to having top of the range facilities, no debt and are now in a position to pump money into the footy dept. players may not like him because he sticks to a budget and sometimes doesnt put money into footy (in the past) but thats better than not having a club (see rangers fc)

rowan is spot on

exactly my point. perception is in the eye of the eye holder. hrm

i still fail to see how we tanked against richmond. we had 3 injured players on the bench. we were two goals up with 2 mins to play. they won AFTER THE SIREN. thats what i call a heroic effort from our guys who should have been well out of it. as for tanking v the saints.........uh they nearly won a flag a month later. tank? more like played out of our skin so we only lost by 47.

Should average the numbers of wins over 3 years, not ladder positions

Lance whitnall in his final game takes a mark 30 out straight in front and it goes out on the full. Ok once, but not twice - first q

State govt. asking for please explain. Integrity officer doing investigating. If we get done for this, despite being so totally crap for 6 years, and no one else does when lots of others have, I will go on a shooting spree.

its been totally [censored] - but i love that everyone tells us we are [censored] - and then accuses us of being good enough to win but dont. are we [censored] or not?

made this point in another thread but its worth making again... '12 - 2 wins '11 - 8 wins '10 - 8 wins '9 - 4 wins '8 - 3 wins '7 - 5 wins 30 wins over 6 years - 30 out of 127 games and we are accused of tanking?

'12 - 2 wins '11 - 8 wins '10 - 8 wins '9 - 4 wins '8 - 3 wins '7 - 5 wins 30 wins over 6 years - 30 out of 127 games and we are accused of tanking?

woah woah woah. brock did not kick the winning goal - he kicked to a lead and missed (it went over the guys head) and somehow bounced through for a goal. biggest fluke ever, dont give him credit for it!

Did i see jack viney named in the bests for the development league? Or did I imagine it

if i were king for a day id remove the playing group salary cap and replace it with a (large) football department one. included in it would be the following coaches players scouts/recruiters football equipment (facilities and their running costs - electricity etc - would NOT be included in this) discuss

Optimistic as it turns out

Beer

This beer is crap. Now that's cynicism! (because all beer is good). To sum up, I like beer