Everything posted by The Panglossian
-
NON-MFC: Round 22
When he was born, Mr Miers wanted to call him Brian. The Mrs wanted him to be Graham. So they compromised on “ Gryan”.
-
NON-MFC: Round 22
Mr Smug (otherwise known as “Fly”),is quoted as saying. “No-one’s bigger than the individual”. !!!!!! Certainly no-one’s bigger than kicker Mason Cox. Is that what he meant? I wonder if he mixes up another metaphor and says….” there’s no “I” in “side”. !!!!!!!!
-
NON-MFC: Round 22
Sack Mc Rae!!!
-
NON-MFC: Round 22
D espies umpires
-
NON-MFC: Round 22
This is fun!!!
-
Nathan Buckley a Dees supporter?
I just checked AFL tables, in April 1991. Cuthbertson kicked 7 v North in our record equaling, score, then another 7 in our win v Collingwood( during my honeymoon,.), then 5 the next week. Then we had a bye, and he seemed to lose all form. I don’t know if this was when he lost his mate.
-
Nathan Buckley a Dees supporter?
I think Darren lost his best friend in a car accident or something, and had trouble getting over it. I wonder if he keeps in contact with his old team mates.
-
Welcome to Demonland: Tom Campbell
Let’s hope Max doesn’t get injured. If he does TC would be an excellent replacement in the short term. But Will Verrall’s development must be kept in consideration.
-
Christian Petracca and Clayton Oliver in 2026
People seem to forget that it is only just over a year since Trac nearly DIED from a football injury. It’s amazing he’s played as well as he has this year under the circumstances, and we can expect him to return to great form in 2026. It would be foolishness of the highest order to let him go. Meanwhile, I think supporters under-rate Clarrie’s contribution this year. He’s in and under packs and distributing the ball so fast that you have to watch the replay to know it was he who got it out. His stats aren’t as elite as they were before his meltdown, but his pre-season was compromised, and probably won’t be, in 2026. Please, please , retain these two champions.
-
PODCAST: Rd 21 vs West Coast
I thought he played much better in the Seniors than any of his Casey games.
-
NON-MFC: Round 21
“Dingley!”……I love that!
-
NON-MFC: Round 21
Geelong winning by50 points, and Port have a set shot. VLoud booing from the Geelong supporters. Pathetic! I’m glad not many Dee supporters do that. But I do like the way the Demon army make a lot of distracting noise, led by their blond “conductor.”
-
After the Great Choke
The umpire was the dumb one. The touch was blatant.
-
After the Great Choke
Item no. 1 above. Rivers tackled him straight away, because he knew it was obviously touched in transit....directly in front of him, and an umpire. It should have been holding the ball.
-
PREGAME: Rd 20 vs St. Kilda
What about how he fails to keep his feet in contests, i.e. goes to ground? How many dropped chest mark scan we tolerate? He’s never dominated a reserves game the way AJ did last match( admittedly v weak opposition)
-
May to Tribunal
Brereton got it right ( for once) when he said you reflexly clench your fists when intending to bump . May’s hands were open at the time of the clash.in an intent to grab the ball.
-
NON-MFC: Round 19
It was just luck that Moore didn’t rupture that guy’s spleen . I was hoping Freo would kick a high one to Moore in “ the hole”, and Treacy would rush in with his knee in the back , the way he did twice to Gawn in the pre-season game. Or perhaps Brayshaw would do a “ football act “ spoil on skunkhead Maynard , ending his career. Neither happened, but at least they lost.
-
POSTGAME: Rd 18 vs North Melbourne
L Actually , Xerri coat-hangered Lindsay in the first quarter, with 3 min to go. It was “strikingly” ( pardon the pun) similar to the Sparrow hit.
- Arm chopping and blocking in marking contests
-
PREGAME: Rd 19 vs Carlton
18.11 wasn’t accurate enough. We might get 19.6 v Carlton. And….We must remember to pretend we’ve touched it every time they kick a goal.
-
Arm chopping and blocking in marking contests
I reckon that almost every dropped contested mark involves arm chopping by the player trying to spoil. Similarly, most contested marks are partly a result of clever blocking by a team-mate. Like with “ ruck-lotto”, every now and then an umpire will pay a free for a block or an arm chop. Collingwood still whinge about the block on Maynard when Dom Sheed took the GF winning mark. But it happens, unpenalised all the time. The commentators compliment the players on a “clever block.” Similarly, with pushing in the back in marking contests . A principle of our game is to play in front. But if you do, the guy behind gives you a shove, a nudge or a bump in the back and marks it as if unopposed. Every now and then an umpire will pay a push in the back, but nowhere near often enough, in my opinion. Are those marks recorded as “ contested”, when the man in front is just shoved out of the way?
-
POSTGAME: Rd 18 vs North Melbourne
I was just watching the Replay of the North game. In the second quarter, Xerri swung a forearm into Xavier Lindsay’s head, knocking him over with a glancing blow. Very similar to the Sparrow incident, but luckily ( for him and X),with no serious consequences. The fact that he’s done it twice in one game shows that it’s more than just an unfortunate incident. He’s aggressive and clumsy.
-
Trade Targets
Who doesn’t!?
-
Time to go Goody?
We were dead stiff. Definitely the better side in 3 of the 4 losses.
-
PREGAME: Rd 18 vs North Melbourne
I have a weird feeling we’re going to kick straight tomorrow……18.6, or something like that!