Timothy Reddan-A'Blew

Thanks. And that's OK; I know my plaice.

I'll fish a bit further, @Demonstone; I realise there should have been four categories (with examples now): 1. Football related and related to the selected players e.g. 'Scored goal with first kick' 2. Football related but not related to the selected players e.g. 'Share name with Brownlow medallist' 3. Not football related but related to the selected players e.g. 'Born in same month' 4. Not football related or related to the selected players e.g. 'Share name with famous guitarist' Ready, set, go again...

Game in hand, Cool10 😏

@Demonstone, may I request for this, and for any other future mockeries, by you, me or any other bravehearts, that the commonality be nominated at the outset, in one of the three following categories: 1. Football related and related to the selected players 2. Football related but not related to the selected players 3. Not football related. Ready, set, go...

Very 'Now', D! Thenkew.

'YMMV'?

When all our world seems preoccupied otherwise, @Demonstone, a brave venture into Not Taking Things Too Seriously! Power to your arm, Good Sir.

BG: 'A good culture is a team that wins, a bad culture is a team that's losing' There you have it. No more correspondence should be entered into.

That the Club has made a point of creating and putting this on its website suggests, 'He's in!' https://www.melbournefc.com.au/video/1576724/koltyn-tholstrup-vfl-highlights?videoId=1576724&modal=true&type=video&publishFrom=1718175600001

Don't tell me you actually look like that then, Stigga?! 😲 Just the 'presence' the team needs if so!

But will they be coming off their second?...

Perhaps we have the answer now? Trac and Gus. (Spot the common thread...)

Chin up. Too soon?

What's this?...

If ever Colgate-Palmolive (or any other corporate for that matter) wants a broad-spectrum focus group to test their ads, they know where to come now! 😉

'x' the unknown number, so 10 to the power 8, times x, would definitely be Superunknown! 🙂

The new benchmark for agreement, Super? Impressive 🙂 (p.s. I note '10^8x' might describe you?!😁)

Why a Melbourne player? If they wanted the correct oral contrast with Swans brilliant-enamel white, this is where they should have gone...

I had not. Thanks again (I think...) I pleasantly imagine who the archer's target is...

I'm fairly sure Autocorrect overwrote your self-deprecating 'single', DP. Or are you boasting?

The smile's hard to read, W. I'd err on the side of caution, nice boy that Christian is, notwithstanding.

No KW again?

That's part of the key, isn't it? In the absence of the complete package that a Max brings, the componentry priorities for the mere mortals filling the gap/s would appear to be: First. Providing a disruptive contest with the presumed dominant tap/take oppo ruck (combined with suitably modified structures around) Second. Providing a full-ground presence (preferably marking presence) that forces oppo ruck to chase, or oppo positional players into uncertainty Third. Providing impactful follow up at stoppage (an 'extra midfielder'). And each of these requires the ability to do so for (it seems) 70% game time. How do our various bigger players, untried and tried, stack up?

Thinking before speaking. On here, Master? Shirley you jest!

'Deride' is harsh on us, DP. I feel it presents us as worthy of 'ovation', at least. 'Missiles', too, though unclear as to where along its ('their'?😄) evolution! Exit, stage right.