Timothy Reddan-A'Blew

Just the slightest of pangs seeing the delight on Clarry's face in that last sequence. And the team orientation of Trac in the earlier hand-off. But Harvey's going to be part of what makes up for it in '26 and beyond.

How poor a second best, then, would the Olympic Park site be for us? But 'Collingwood' at 'Caulfield'. Little more in common than their initial.

@radar - From reverseaustralia.com My interest was piqued because of the book. I have it; it's a good one. I hope they update it before I 'shuffle off'!

SS actually said we're "really" close, but then stumbled into "than we have been before". Clear as the winter Glenferrie Oval 😄

Anything in the speeches, or in side conversation, about the women's program and/or the women's coach?

Someone remind us what the particular emotional, social and/or 'football' connections he had with us? As to attractiveness from a football perspective, the 2026 performances of our new and new-ish young brigade might be more important than ladder position?

Paste to look closely, G?

Live stream link on the Club's website.

Very disappointing, Brownie. Training is evidently a great opportunity to engage with Club folks, for those comfortable to do so. @Ghostwriter, or one of the other track watchers: post the AGM, if there's nothing clear from it, could you ask Paul or anyone else with relevant authority, at training, what's going on with the Club and its women's program?

Any inside info, anyone? The Austin and Horisk 'ins' appear to be positive, but I'm a bit paranoid, what with the other 'outs' as well, in the context of Mick's departure and no replacement (or even a 'process'?) confirmed.

Well played on both fronts, P. 😢

@Demonstone, we have established previously that hints from the successful are a definite no-no. However, and particularly for His (pre)Eminence the Puzzles Patron's puzzles, I reckon open discussion of the setter's hints is a yes-yes! And good luck to whoever turns said discussion into success! So... Hmmm: 'positions', yes, but 'places on the field', no! 🤔 And... No MFC players undoubtedly is significant! 🤨 Because, say, each team member matches an MFC player in some way? 🔬 Humbly, I look forward to your resounding squashes, Mr Stone!

I was just trying to be funny, Mr Stone. You're not trying to tell me this is actually about team members' attitudes on something (and football based), as opposed to their places on the field?!

On what football-based issues?

You're clearly in the box seat. Kudos.