For us ... right now ... Nathan Jones by a street!

Would we have got more than pick 11 for Jones?

PS. Demonland should go the way of the AFL and effectively outlaw the bump.

I'd probably say McLean will have the better career if injury is kind to him. Has special leadership qualities on-field (certainly not off-field at the moment) and is one of the rare MFC players that opposition fans highly rate.

But for some reason, I hope Jones has the better career.

Now I can identify the fact as to why I wanted Jones to have the better career

Edited October 12, 200916 yr by Bring-Back-Powell

Would we have got more than pick 11 for Jones?

Exactly my thoughts.

The question is otherwise redundant now McLean has left. Jones has a grrat opportunity to step up and continue his improvement from last year.

PS. Demonland should go the way of the AFL and effectively outlaw the bump.

Cagey thought

Thinking about this now, I say Jones is more valuable, and am glad that we kept him and lost Brock, not the other way around. There isn't a huge amount of 21-year-olds who have played 70 games. I think the upside for Jones can be large. Still so young. I think a lot of people think of him in the Rivers/Sylvia et al age bracket, when he is in the same age group as Petterd and Wonnaeamirri. He could be a 250-gamer for MFC.

Edited October 12, 200916 yr by Adelaide Demon

PS. Demonland should go the way of the AFL and effectively outlaw the bump.

As long as there is no head high contact, the bump can stay. B)

You don't see too many 4th bumps on threads...

Interesting.

Oh, who is more valuable?

Couldn't care less, couldn't give a sh!t.

Couldn't care less, couldn't give a sh!t.

Joe the cameraman!

Joe the cameraman!

Penny for the smart lady.

Where's that from? It's a tough one.

Niche.