Jump to content

Byron Pickett

Featured Replies

Posted

Just wondering whether anyone knows or thinks that Pickett will play this week against St.Kilda.

I'd love to see him out there for the season opener. He just provides that X-factor in big games at the MCG.

Can he play with just 1 VFL game as preparation?

Were they resting him yesterday (5 day break) with the view of playing him this week?

Has he a hidden injury which the MFC are refusing to reveal?

Thoughts?

 

BBP ive been thinking about this since yesterday myself. there can really only be a few scenarios;

1. He is unfit and won't play Rd 1 = They would have played him on Sunday

2. He is unfit but they will play him anyway = He probably would have still played on Sunday

3. He has made the grade re fitness and will play Rd 1 = He probably wouldnt have played yesterday.

4. He has an injury which we havent been made aware of = He wouldnt have played Yesterday.

I imagine 2 or 3 are the most likely, or at least make the most sense.

I believe they were resting him with a view that maybe Brock will not play Rnd 1....

Pickett IN

Brock OUT

 

Channel 10 sport said he was in doubt with hamstring soreness

Channel 10 sport said he was in doubt with hamstring soreness

Channel 10 sport say a lot of things.....

IMO most of it is crap....

I think we will have to wait a few more days and hear what the good Rev says...

Now there is a bloke we can believe!!


i think he will play, just due to the fact that st kilda are physically soft, and byron running around, for even 10mins a qtr will heighten their fears!!!

said in the sun that pickett mclean sylvia holland not in, due to short gap between the sandy game

Could you elaborate on this if you catch this reply? I'm not sure what that means.

Only Sylvia played on Sunday, so the others should be cherry ripe. But did that quote mean that since they were approved to play last Sunday they can't play on Friday? Seems odd to me.

Thanks.

 
said in the sun that pickett mclean sylvia holland not in, due to short gap between the sandy game

it said in the Sun that Mclean, Holland and Pickett were not risked with Sandy because there is only a 5 day break from the Sandy game to the Demons opener

Just noticed your new signature and profile Y_M...

Nothing if not entertaining...

BTW is it you that keeps posting all those match videos on youtube? If so... Do more. Maybe rounds 20 and 21 of 2005 if you're bored.


Pickett will be named but wont play, Holland will only play if Caroll our Rivers doesn't, get set for the return of the Biz.

Could you elaborate on this if you catch this reply? I'm not sure what that means.

Only Sylvia played on Sunday, so the others should be cherry ripe. But did that quote mean that since they were approved to play last Sunday they can't play on Friday? Seems odd to me.

Thanks.

dang must of read it wrong:(

I hope the Biz is in.... he is still great value and can provide lots of rebound out of the backline.. if he plays and has a good game... it wont be easy for ND to drop him.

Good Luck Biz, i still got faith in you!

I think a lot of the hype about players has been for mind games. I doubt rivers will play and would prefer him to not if he is injured or sore. Mclean will play i have no doubt about it. Sylvia will not and shouldnt till he gets fit. Pickett i believe is the player their using as mind games and will play. Obviously bartram wont. We are somewhat depleated however as are the saints. Their forward line lacks kicking capasity without Reiwoldt and Kosi. No height at CHF for them. Hudgton will play as Matty isnt ready and neitz will kick another bag on him...hopefully have better luck than the posts.

My team for if pickett, holland, bartram, Sylvia dont play

B: Wheelan Carroll Wornock

HB: Bell Ward Bruce

C: C.Johnson Moloney Bate

HF: Robbo Miller Green

F: Jamar Neitz Davey

R: White McDonnald McLean

I.C: Jones, Yze, Wheatley, Godfrey

Brad Green on SEN said Pickett passed his skin fold and fitness tests a couple of weeks ago and will line up in round 1. Rivers is doubtful with hamstring soreness.


Rivers is doubtful with hamstring soreness.

Has that kid ever made it to Round 1 un-injured? :unsure::(

Hopefully it rains, or at the very least Reiwoldt doesn't play, thereby reducing the need for Rivers.

Why does that team look so depleted Occo... i know a few are out but howd Warnock and Godfrey get into the 22... Surely Bizz ahead of Warnock.. and someone younger instead of Godfrey??? SURELY:) PLEASE LOL

I think a lot of the hype...

My team for if pickett, holland, bartram, Sylvia dont play

B: Wheelan Carroll Wornock

HB: Bell Ward Bruce

C: C.Johnson Moloney Bate

HF: Robbo Miller Green

F: Jamar Neitz Davey

R: White McDonnald McLean

I.C: Jones, Yze, Wheatley, Godfrey

Godfrey?

Interesting choice.

No Rivers?

Godfrey?

Interesting choice.

No Rivers?

Rivers is doubtfull to play and wont in my opinion, esp since rievoldt wont play. Our team looks depleated cause u cant hep it if u have names like Pickett, Rivers, Dunn, Sylvia out. I choose Godfrey because he may get a tagging job on Dal Santo - a player who doesent handle getting tagged well. On the contrary McDonnald may get the rounds again. Wornock instead of Biz is easy to justify- we already have running backman like Ward, C.Johnson, Bell, Whelan and i believe the kid had shown enough this preseason to earn a spot.

Am i wrong in remembering Rivers getting cut open by Nick Reiwolt the last few times? Maybe im mistaken, but i seem to rmember him getting a hiding.

Who would he most likely line up on if Nick R didnt play?


Am i wrong in remembering Rivers getting cut open by Nick Reiwolt the last few times? Maybe im mistaken, but i seem to rmember him getting a hiding.

Who would he most likely line up on if Nick R didnt play?

I read somewhere that Junior was under a bit of a cloud with a calf problem.

Am i wrong in remembering Rivers getting cut open by Nick Reiwolt the last few times? Maybe im mistaken, but i seem to rmember him getting a hiding.

Who would he most likely line up on if Nick R didnt play?

In '05 (or was it '04?) Riewoldt kicked 9 against the Dees. 5 came against Nicho and the other 4 against Rivers.

Last year during the H&A season Melbourne had a lot of success with Carroll playing on Riewoldt when he went deep in their forward line and from memory Rivers played on him a bit when he played up the ground.

I can't remember who played on Riewoldt in the final last year.

Besides that day when Riewoldt kicked 9 and almost won the game off his own boot I can't remember him beating or even playing on Rivers too often.

I'm sure someone with a better memory can fill in the gaps for me.

IMO Rivers is an ideal match-up for Riewoldt. Pace being his only issue.

I read somewhere that Junior was under a bit of a cloud with a calf problem.

No mention of that on Ch. 10 news.

Said Rivers and Byron will have fitness tests tomorrow, along with plenty of Saints who are under injury clouds. Reiwoldt is unlikely to play, with Kosi and a couple of others only a 50-50 chance.

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Thanks
    • 187 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 181 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Sad
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 533 replies