Jump to content

Featured Replies

6 hours ago, binman said:

You do do you. That's interesting to know.

Because i have such a record on demonland of potting the club.

That will come as a surprise to the posters who  suggested i work for the club and am a MFC plant on this site, such was my supposedly happy clapper blind defence of the club and push back against those actually potting the club last season (see the sack the Goodwin thread, which has thankfully gone into remission). 

It might come as surprise to you angry, but is possible to hold disparate and sometimes seemingly contradictory opinions. I can support the club, think the FD and coaches are dong a good job, think the board is stable and effective etc etc  AND think the communication from the club is poor and a cause for concern. 

Well bring a member you either got a latter from the club, or if you are registered to receive emails,  then U had notification about the t the AGM,,saty said he personally volunteered for club sending out those envelopes to those members I believe him over anybody else,

being a member myself I've always got a letter from the club about the AGM every year never missed it how come you didn't get one, it's an AGM for God's sake no one hardly  goes, why  should the club put 10 times more effort into notifying people about an AGM when it's not even important to most members no one cares. I went to an AGM once and you know what when I really wanted to go I found out about it and put it in my calendar and make sure I had time  to gO, how much more communication do you want a countdown email 10 days before the AGM one-a-day.

I don't want the club to waist heaps of money on AGM'S, I rather them spend their money on the footy department and winning games AGM's are a waste of time and money, it's a football club, not a business that's what Ron barassi carries on about he hates the business side of it when it should be all about footy 

Edited by don't make me angry

 
6 hours ago, Moonshadow said:

Find another post where I've "slagged" the club? If it's "the same people" all the time you shouldn't have a problem finding another one from me in, say, the last month or 2.

And FYI, MFCSS relates to Melbourne supporters falling back into pessimism. Got nothing to do with always being ready to pot the club. 

So you are wrong again. Give up pal.

No I'm not wrong MFCSS members are always negative never believe what the club is doing this rights, ok watch out cos I'm going to watch every single negative post you put

Is the MFCSS in the dictionary no it's not so I can apply what ever meaning I like like it or lump it

Edited by don't make me angry

Good Lord angry. Are you for real?

You should change your name to don't make me coherant 

 
6 hours ago, Satyriconhome said:

 

The point some other posters are trying to point out is even if there is a slight error in anything the club does, the usual suspects are immediately in the topic hammering the club

Infallibility must be a wonderful thing

With all due respect saty i'm not sure there is much evidence of so called usual suspects hammering the club in this thread. 

If you think otherwise can you name who you are referring to.

Edited by binman

6 hours ago, Satyriconhome said:

I work in an industry that still utilises mail, we have RTS coz the postman put in wrong box, address had a slight error in the database etc etv also it was stolen from the letterbox 

The point some other posters are trying to point out is even if there is a slight error in anything the club does, the usual suspects are immediately in the topic hammering the club

Infallibility must be a wonderful thing

The usual suspects? Hammered the club? Hyperbole much!

Please look at my record and find a post where I "hammered" the club? 

Commenting that the Club's communication is lacking is hardly that, chap.


3 hours ago, don't make me angry said:

No I'm not wrong MFCSS members are always negative never believe what the club is doing this rights, ok watch out cos I'm going to watch every single negative post you put

Is the MFCSS in the dictionary no it's not so I can apply what ever meaning I like like it or lump it

You're angry with no idea why!

Classic.

4 hours ago, binman said:

Good Lord angry. Are you for real?

You should change your name to don't make me coherant 

ummm......coherent

8 hours ago, Moonshadow said:

You're angry with no idea why!

Classic.

Yes when anyone criticises my team for no reason I'll go after them like an opposition supporter

 
4 hours ago, daisycutter said:

ummm......coherent

 Binman needs a lot of communication you got to remind him something every day cause he forgets, bin man should change his name to I need lots of communication or I feel left out

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Gold Coast

    From the start, Melbourne’s performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Gold Coast

    Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 87 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 231 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 41 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road again and this may be the last roll of the dice to get their 2025 season back on track as they take on the Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 546 replies