101L - 32W

I know we disagree, often, and that's fine, it's what Demonland is all about.

But to KEEP posting the same comment over and over not only hinders your cause and makes you less credible, it actually qualifies you as a troll.

Edited April 4, 201313 yr by stuie

Of course he's a troll.

He won't engage in discussion.

It's just continual pushing his agenda.

Over and over.

And over.

You'll let us know when you commence irony won't you Sultan?

I'm in favour of leaving the club alone for the sake of stability and then doing a holistic review at the end of the season.

I was there Sunday.

Fair enough. But i don't think we have 21 weeks.

The media vultures will drink blood if the losses mount up

IF Essendrug pump us, what spin could the club say. It would be totally hollow.

We have to fire shots this week...

Edited April 4, 201313 yr by why you little

Fair enough. But i don't think we have 21 weeks.

The media vultures will drink blood if the losses mount up

IF Essendrug pump us, what spin could the club say. It would be totally hollow.

We have to fire shots this week...

Agree with that.

Not saying we WILL make it til end of season with mounting pressure, but I HOPE we do so we can do it properly.

Neal Craig was specifically asked that last year, and denied that it was happening or was an issue.

Non-event, nothing to discuss here, move along. CEO has just been given a new contract, obviously the Board - who would know more than any of us here about what Cam's role is and how he's performing - are happy with him.

...and so you think the players would confide in Neil after they were screwed last time?

...and so you think the players would confide in Neil after they were screwed last time?

Who exactly was screwed?

If I recall correctly, they screwed themselves with their performance in 186.

Agree with that.

Not saying we WILL make it til end of season with mounting pressure, but I HOPE we do so we can do it properly.

I REALLY WANT Neeld to take charge of all this. It can be done.

But fcuk it is an enormous job.

Jens,

This may be some of the information in the public domain that HazyShadeofGrinter is referring to.

http://mobile.news.com.au/sport/afl/dean-baileys-axing-saved-cameron-schwab/story-fndv7pj3-1226455287044

I REALLY WANT Neeld to take charge of all this. It can be done.

But fcuk it is an enormous job.

Someone needs to. At least we'll know who to blame and we'll stop swinging widely at anyone and everyone.

Who exactly was screwed?

If I recall correctly, they screwed themselves with their performance in 186.

Would that include one J Rivers?

Jens,

This may be some of the information in the public domain that HazyShadeofGrinter is referring to.

http://mobile.news.com.au/sport/afl/dean-baileys-axing-saved-cameron-schwab/story-fndv7pj3-1226455287044

that would be it.

I know we disagree, often, and that's fine, it's what Demonland is all about.

But to KEEP posting the same comment over and over not only hinders your cause and makes you less credible, it actually qualifies you as a troll.

You have the choice to pass over my comments, Stuie.

Clearly there is something about 101L - 32W that is getting to you, or you wouldn't get so inflamed about it.

Eventually the penny will drop. As Luke said to Darth ... "I see the good in you".

Edited April 4, 201313 yr by Range Rover

7 wins in 64 games against Victorian Clubs. Just mentioned on SEN.

You have the choice to pass over my comments, Stuie.

Clearly there is something about 101L - 32W that is getting to you, or you wouldn't get so inflamed about.

Eventually the penny will drop. As Luke said to Darth ... "I see the good in you".

Haha... It's not getting to ANYONE in the way you want it to. You obviously have no other facts to misinterpret otherwise you may say something different every now and then.

Haha... It's not getting to ANYONE in the way you want it to. You obviously have no other facts to misinterpret otherwise you may say something different every now and then.

Stuie that win loss ratio is putrid. It makes me sick. I really you would stop defending it.

We all have to tell the club it is PUTRID.

...and so you think the players would confide in Neil after they were screwed last time?

Ah, I see that you as well haven't stopped beating your wife ...

Haha... It's not getting to ANYONE in the way you want it to. You obviously have no other facts to misinterpret otherwise you may say something different every now and then.

What about 101 Losses - 32 Wins .... including 7 wins in 64 games against Vic clubs am I "misinterpreting" ?

Please do enlighten with your acumen.

Edited April 4, 201313 yr by Range Rover

Stuie that win loss ratio is putrid. It makes me sick. I really you would stop defending it.

We all have to tell the club it is PUTRID.

It's a horrible record, and I'm not defending it at all, but to post it continuously as RR does is the same thing a troll does.

Ah, I see that you as well haven't stopped beating your wife ...

I would point the mods to this comment as unacceptable on this site, regardless of context.

Bing is fully aware another poster was warned about this. Which makes his follow up worse.

It's a horrible record, and I'm not defending it at all, but to post it continuously as RR does is the same thing a troll does.

Yet you keep vigorously defending the administration that has presided over it. Defending the indefensible is about as close to "trolling" as you can get I would've thought.

I've responded by asking numerous questions about your interpretation of the score line RR, but you constantly avoid answering.

Pathetic.

It's a horrible record, and I'm not defending it at all, but to post it continuously as RR does is the same thing a troll does.

No Stuie. It should be posted on every entry that is posted on here so it actually sinks in. 101 L 32 W is how the club fortunes are remembered.

It stinks.

Yet you keep vigorously defending the administration that has presided over it. Defending the indefensible is about as close to "trolling" as you can get I would've thought.

Sorry, I didn't realize pointing out you've posted the SAME THING countless times across Demonland was "vigorously defending the administration".

I've responded by asking numerous questions about your interpretation of the score line RR, but you constantly avoid answering.

Pathetic.

I'm not the one peddling the snake oil. You are. "Interpret" away.