Jump to content

David Buttifant, Director of Sports Science, CFC

Featured Replies

Posted

If there is any man in the country that the Dees should be targeting right now, perhaps it should be David Buttifant, Director of Sports Science at Collingwood Football Club.

According to a friend of mine (Pies' Coterie member), Buttifant is the brains behind the Collingwood machine. He essentially manages the list and coordinates the fitness and training programmes (all absolutely elite - essentially the benchmark in Australian sport at the moment). Buckley is putting all of his efforts into ensuring that Buttifant remains at the Pies next year.

If the Pies win the Grand Final, and MM is moved out of the coaching box, it is likely to have a destabilising effect on some in the coaching ranks at CFC. That being the case, I hope the MFC is waiting in the wings, cheque book in hand. This is an area in which (from the outside looking in) it seems to me that we really need to strengthen our capability.

 

I really doubt he'd move from CFC at the moment. Training facilities are superb, and second to none. With an open cheque-book, and the chance to leave a legacy, I'd say the only chance he'd have of leaving would be part due to malthouse obtaining a new gig and choosig to take members of the FD with him.

Agree with both above posts. It would be great to get him, I have read that he is a big part of the Pies success, but doubt he would come from a club like Collingwood where he can implement his ideas (Arizonian), to a club like Melbourne where he would be hamstrung.

 

You're a bit late to the party on this one.

I've been eyeing him off for a while, but alas, he has just recently been re-contracted, along with Scott Watters, Gary Pert and others.

Notably Mark Neeld wasn't included in those names, but I presume that means he already was contracted.

Of course, a head coaching opportunity trumps that.

I sorta hoped we could get Malthouse and he'd bring Neeld across with him.

A contract that has been running for a year or 2 is easier to break than one that has just been signed (not legally, but ethically).

Unless you're Sean Wellman...

I really doubt he'd move from CFC at the moment. Training facilities are superb, and second to none. With an open cheque-book, and the chance to leave a legacy, I'd say the only chance he'd have of leaving would be part due to malthouse obtaining a new gig and choosig to take members of the FD with him.

But here I thought the AAMI Park facilities were second to none....that's what has been the consensus.

So target a Buttifant/Malthouse package with upsize.


But here I thought the AAMI Park facilities were second to none....that's what has been the consensus.

So target a Buttifant/Malthouse package with upsize.

Shared facilities, albeit good none-the-less have nothing on CFC.

Shared facilities, albeit good none-the-less have nothing on CFC.

How so?

How good would it be to secure: Malthouse, Neeld (with the promise to be Mick's successor), Buttifant. Would love this but unfortunately I haven't woken up from my dream...

 

How so?

You can't be serious.

Collingwood have access to a world class running track, altitude chamber, gym and other training facilities all at one venue. These are all centralized, where as we have Casey and AAMI. In terms of ease and exculsivity CFC do easily trump us. I would have thought that the advantages of having exclusive training facilities whould be quite obvious.

Also let's not forget the FD spend that Collingwood have as opposed to ours.

Please don't say that Buttifant would be tempted to cross because the reality is he wouldn't. As I've said before the only way I'd imagine he'd come to us would be if Malthouse were coach and part of the deal was he could bring across his own staff.

You can't be serious.

Collingwood have access to a world class running track, altitude chamber, gym and other training facilities all at one venue. These are all centralized, where as we have Casey and AAMI. In terms of ease and exculsivity CFC do easily trump us. I would have thought that the advantages of having exclusive training facilities whould be quite obvious.

Also let's not forget the FD spend that Collingwood have as opposed to ours.

Please don't say that Buttifant would be tempted to cross because the reality is he wouldn't. As I've said before the only way I'd imagine he'd come to us would be if Malthouse were coach and part of the deal was he could bring across his own staff.

Aslo no budget for trips to Arizonian and any other ideas he may come up with. Why would he want to downgrade?


You can't be serious.

Collingwood have access to a world class running track, altitude chamber, gym and other training facilities all at one venue. These are all centralized, where as we have Casey and AAMI. In terms of ease and exculsivity CFC do easily trump us. I would have thought that the advantages of having exclusive training facilities whould be quite obvious.

Also let's not forget the FD spend that Collingwood have as opposed to ours.

Please don't say that Buttifant would be tempted to cross because the reality is he wouldn't. As I've said before the only way I'd imagine he'd come to us would be if Malthouse were coach and part of the deal was he could bring across his own staff.

I am serious.

I don't know what facilities Collingwood has.

I'd assume if our facilities are meant to be state of the art, we'd have everything they do.

I don't think there's anything at Casey that we don't have at AAMI.

As I understand it, exclusivity isn't an issue for MFC.

We don't have clashes trying to share the facilities - they are big enough for all tenants.

I don't think Buttifant would be tempted at all. No chance.

I am serious.

I don't know what facilities Collingwood has.

I'd assume if our facilities are meant to be state of the art, we'd have everything they do.

I don't think there's anything at Casey that we don't have at AAMI.

As I understand it, exclusivity isn't an issue for MFC.

We don't have clashes trying to share the facilities - they are big enough for all tenants.

I don't think Buttifant would be tempted at all. No chance.

The gap between us and Collingwood is massive. A lot of this comes does come down to profit margins, sponsorship etc but at this stage we don't have anything close to CFC.

The gap between us and Collingwood is massive. A lot of this comes does come down to profit margins, sponsorship etc but at this stage we don't have anything close to CFC.

I agree that in terms of resources we don't have half of what Collingwood does, but I thought our facilities were second to none.

Obviously I must be wrong.

I agree that in terms of resources we don't have half of what Collingwood does, but I thought our facilities were second to none.

Obviously I must be wrong.

Our facilities are very good, but I'd say that what is available at the Westpac center, would still be far superior to what we have available.


Our facilities are very good, but I'd say that what is available at the Westpac center, would still be far superior to what we have available.

Care to provide details?

Care to provide details?

Obviously I'm not privy to everything at Westpac, however they have a centralized structure which enable them to minimize travel, optimize training sessions, focus on recovery as they have little or no travel time after training sessions, access to an altitude chamber which maximizes their Arizona trips, exclusive access to the VIS running tracks at Olympic park, plus the convenience of being next door to Gosch's paddock.

Melbourne's AAMI park is fantastic don't get me wrong, howeve the fact remains that we have half our training and recovery facilities at AAMI, whilst our football training is out at Casey. This isn't ideal, recovery can't take place immediately after, there is the issue of travel between venues and our AAMI facilities are shared with the Storm and rebels. Yes this doesn't present a huge problem, but the fact remains that they're not our OWN facilities.

Don't get me wrong at all, I'm not knocking the club, just presenting my views on why Buttifant wouldn't cross over on his own accord. From a proffesional standpoint I can't see any comparison with what Collingwood have at Westpac sadly.

Obviously I'm not privy to everything at Westpac, however they have a centralized structure which enable them to minimize travel, optimize training sessions, focus on recovery as they have little or no travel time after training sessions, access to an altitude chamber which maximizes their Arizona trips, exclusive access to the VIS running tracks at Olympic park, plus the convenience of being next door to Gosch's paddock.

Melbourne's AAMI park is fantastic don't get me wrong, howeve the fact remains that we have half our training and recovery facilities at AAMI, whilst our football training is out at Casey. This isn't ideal, recovery can't take place immediately after, there is the issue of travel between venues and our AAMI facilities are shared with the Storm and rebels. Yes this doesn't present a huge problem, but the fact remains that they're not our OWN facilities.

Don't get me wrong at all, I'm not knocking the club, just presenting my views on why Buttifant wouldn't cross over on his own accord. From a proffesional standpoint I can't see any comparison with what Collingwood have at Westpac sadly.

You know the boys train just outside of AAMI right next door, don't you ?

They train occassionally at Casey and over parts of the Summer.

Yeah, they share the facilities with Storm/Victory. But it's a smooth operation and comes with benefits as far as resources go in networking with alternative codes and cross training (occassionally) and/or communication.

Either way, Buttifant will be at Collingwood under good conditions, but I don't think it's as much of a "downgrade" as you suggest if he did move to Mfc.

I was under the impression Casey was used all year in addition to GP? Apologies if I'm wrong.

I think it's 1 session a fortnight at Casey, during the season.

And having seen the facilities first-hand, I don't think there'd be any issues with sharing with other codes.

Plenty of room for everyone.

We have our own medical room.

The gym is 11 times larger than what we had at the Junction Oval, and all equipment & machines are brand new.

I think the one thing we don't have is the hyperbaric chamber.

That coupled with not currently taking trips to Arizona, mean we are behind.

Maybe the introduction of such a trip could be negotiated if be were to come?

In any case, it won't happen.


I'm certainly with the sentiment here. Getting the very best possible 'whole of football department' together has to be the goal, with a solid coach apable of leading and delegating being the obvious pin to hold it together.

i know the Buttifants really well...not a snow flakes chance of David leaving Collingwood...but the nicest guy you'd ever wish to meet

i know the Buttifants really well...not a snow flakes chance of David leaving Collingwood...but the nicest guy you'd ever wish to meet

Never met the guy, but from what I've heard, you're exactly right.

 

He'd be an absolute gem to get over to the bright side...I've asked him a couple of times to leave the dark forces, all to his amusement, but he'd never leave the Pies. Entire Buttifant family just great people. Go to Pies website and track down info on NICK Foundation. David is behind it.

For anyone interested in reading this thread though, I was at a small and invitation only Collingwood function earlier this year when H. O'Brien (also a really nice bloke, very genuine and down to earth) and Malthouse spoke about commitment. During his speech Mick made it very clear to the small audience that he'd leave Pies if there was nothing left for him to do there or made him 'passionate' about staying on. Don't know what all the hoo haa is all about Mick's departure. Unless he can find an ongoing personal challenge, he'd leave he said. It was said for all to hear and none of the Pies members in the audience gasped for air. He definitely struck me as a bloke who meant what he said. That's just a tid bit for anyone interested in the 'will he' 'won't he' MM debate. He also told a great story about the process he followed to clean up WCE when he went over. Very funny indeed. No prisoners were taken! If he does come to Dees, he will rock our house to its foundations!

i know the Buttifants really well...not a snow flakes chance of David leaving Collingwood...but the nicest guy you'd ever wish to meet

Yeah I went to school with his son, he was one of the nicest guys you'd ever meet.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Fremantle

    A month is a long time in AFL football. The proof of this is in the current state of the two teams contesting against each other early this Saturday afternoon at the MCG. It’s hard to fathom that when Melbourne and Fremantle kicked off the 2025 season, the former looked like being a major player in this year’s competition after it came close to beating one of the favourites in the GWS Giants while the latter was smashed by Geelong to the tune of 78 points and looked like rubbish. Fast forward to today and the Demons are low on confidence and appear panic stricken as their winless streak heads towards an even half dozen and pressure mounts on the coach and team leadership.  Meanwhile, the Dockers have recovered their composure and now sit in the top eight. They are definitely on the up and up and look most likely winners this weekend against a team which they have recently dominated and which struggles to find enough passages to the goals to trouble the scorers. And with that, Fremantle will head to the MCG, feeling very good about itself after demolishing Richmond in the Barossa Valley with Josh Treacy coming off a six goal haul and facing up to a Melbourne defence already without Jake Lever and a shaky Steven May needing to pass a fitness test just to make it onto the field of play. 

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 06

    The Easter Round kicks off in style with a Thursday night showdown between Brisbane and Collingwood, as both sides look to solidify their spots inside the Top 4 early in the season. Good Friday brings a double-header, with Carlton out to claim consecutive wins when they face the struggling Kangaroos, while later that night the Eagles host the Bombers in Perth, still chasing their first victory of the year. Saturday features another marquee clash as the resurgent Crows look to rebound from back-to-back losses against a formidable GWS outfit. That evening, all eyes will be on Marvel Stadium where Damien Hardwick returns to face his old side—the Tigers—coaching the Suns at a ground he's never hidden his disdain for. Sunday offers two crucial contests where the prize is keeping touch with the Top 8. First, Sydney and Port Adelaide go head-to-head, followed by a fierce battle between the Bulldogs and the Saints. Then, Easter Monday delivers the traditional clash between two bitter rivals, both desperate for a win to stay in touch with the top end of the ladder. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons?

      • Thanks
    • 199 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Essendon

    What were they thinking? I mean by “they” the coaching panel and team selectors who chose the team to play against an opponent who, like Melbourne, had made a poor start to the season and who they appeared perfectly capable of beating in what was possibly the last chance to turn the season around.It’s no secret that the Demons’ forward line is totally dysfunctional, having opened the season barely able to average sixty points per game which means there has been no semblance of any system from the team going forward into attack. Nevertheless, on Saturday night at the Adelaide Oval in one of the Gather Round showcase games, Melbourne, with Max Gawn dominating the hit outs against a depleted Essendon ruck resulting from Nick Bryan’s early exit, finished just ahead in clearances won and found itself inside the 50 metre arc 51 times to 43. The end result was a final score that had the Bombers winning 15.6 (96) to 8.9 (57). On balance, one could expect this to result in a two or three goal win, but in this case, it translated into a six and a half goal defeat because they only managed to convert eight times or 11.68% of their entries. The Bombers more than doubled that. On Thursday night at the same ground, the losing team Adelaide managed to score 100 points from almost the same number of times inside 50.

      • Sad
      • Clap
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Essendon

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Thanks
    • 63 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 476 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Essendon

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 24 replies
    Demonland