Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 rubbish calls this game so far.

Mahomes is a great player but i can't believe the way he blatantly draws these fouls. It's the equivalent of diving in soccer and i can't strand that either

Demonland Podcast LIVE @ 8:00PM with Jeff White
 
2 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

Calling it now, who ever wins out of Buffalo or Ravens will smack the chiefs. With the refs help or not.

i hope someone defeats the chiefs. fast becoming my least favoured team

2 minutes ago, BDA said:

i hope someone defeats the chiefs. fast becoming my least favoured team

Good for business though with millions of Swifties watching to see 30 seconds of TS in a 3 hour game. Now Caitlin Clark has joined.

Edited by Clintosaurus

 

Mahomes certainly knows how to milk a penalty.  But technically, the calls are correct

The same over-the-top conspiracy theories surrounded the Patriots year after year (but not any more, since they don't win any more!)

The last roughing the passer was definitely the right call.  Stupid defenders hell-bent on cleaning up Mahomes when he slid legs first

Just don't hit the QB in the head. They should know the rules by now.  Dumb-[censored] defenders


Houston have had plenty of chances to score points but they're just not up to it ... 12 points halfway through the 4th quarter isn't going to get it done

His foot is out once he controls the ball.  Houston got lucky on that call

Houston played well against the Chargers but outplayed by the Chiefs today.  On the road a team needs to score TD's (unless it's a snow match) and the Texans came up way short

As for the Chiefs, they get the rub of the green (sometimes) but you make your own luck

Mahomes is a very clever player and he knows how to milk a penalty (especially with that late decision to slide feet first, which confuses the defenders) 

 

       Leaderboard Tipping Comp

11 - Clintosaurus,  JV7,  ElDiablo

10 - Dr. Gonzo,  Macca

9 - Gorgoroth,  layzie

7 - BDA

6 - DemonDave

55 minutes ago, Macca said:

Mahomes certainly knows how to milk a penalty.  But technically, the calls are correct

The same over-the-top conspiracy theories surrounded the Patriots year after year (but not any more, since they don't win any more!)

Disagree here, first one is a hit to the chest, the second he is a runner who drops late, even the Ref expert said it was not a foul. 


7 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

Disagree here, first one is a hit to the chest, the second he is a runner who drops late, even the Ref expert said it was not a foul. 

Ha ha!  The Ref expert?  

If anything, there is an issue with the rules, not the ref's

They have been told to protect the QB so it stands to reason that that overprotection will result

But that ruling is fair for all QB's and Mahomes is clever enough to milk the contact better than most (or all)

Much like Selwood with the high contact in footy.  500+ times he received questionable frees which often resulted in forward 50 forays

The AFL did nothing (and still do nothing) and it's a blight on the sport   

So essentially we probably agree but change the rules I say

And home town decisions are a staple of all sports

Solution ... make sure you have the home field advantage

In a general sense it's a disadvantage to be on the road in finals/playoffs

I agree the rule has to change but the second hit he was past the line of scrimmage and therefore a runner by definition. 

But we can argue this all day and the fact is Mahomes and the chiefs are just doing what they need to to get over the line each week.

Was there some sort of stat that the visiting team hadn't received a penalty at Man Utd for years?  Or at least, the number was miniscule

Just now, Gorgoroth said:

I agree the rule has to change but the second hit he was past the line of scrimmage and therefore a runner by definition. 

But we can argue this all day and the fact is Mahomes and the chiefs are just doing what they need to to get over the line each week.

Fair enough

I'm firm in the belief that the QB's get far too much protection once they become a runner.  The benefit of the doubt goes the way of the QB because of the way the rule is written

To me they are fair game in that situation but the rules are going the other way so I don't expect a reversal in the way the sport is adjudicated

The answer is to do what Mahomes does and take advantage of the rules

And KC are at home so they are probably going to get a couple of questionable calls going their way 

KC didn't play that well but the Texans were ordinary


7 minutes ago, Macca said:

Was there some sort of stat that the visiting team hadn't received a penalty at Man Utd for years?  Or at least, the number was miniscule

Most teams didn't get into the box at Old Trafford until somewhat recently. 

3 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

Most teams didn't get into the box at Old Trafford until somewhat recently. 

Yeah, they were great for 2 decades (or more) but the folklore surrounding Man Utd was that a visiting team couldn't buy a penalty!!  (for years!)

Houston had close to 400 yards of offense but didn't get into the redzone enough (zero passing TD's) So lots of cheap yards as opposed to impacting yards

Against a team like the Chiefs at their house, a visiting team almost certainly needs to score 3+ TD's


That's a big stop by the Lions

No issue with Washington going for it though.  They need TD's to win at Detroit

Detroit's offense slicing through (as per usual) Too easy

Demonland Podcast LIVE @ 8:00PM with Jeff White
 
2 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

Yeah that was training ground stuff.

Teams are under pressure to score TD's against Detroit (knowing that giving the ball back to the Lions can result in an immediate TD to Detroit)

The Patriots for 2 decades had that same advantage

That pressure can lead to errors with risky plays on offense

Let's see if Washington can stand up


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 2 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 118 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 35 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 296 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies
  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and the Demons have traveled to Alice Springs to take on the Saints and they have a massive opportunity to build on the momentum of two big wins in a row and keep their finals hopes well and truly alive.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 907 replies