Jump to content

Featured Replies

Landry and Tyrod  both traded to Browns who are also chasing Watkins hard it seems.

Kizer traded to GB. 

 

Sherman signs for 3 years with the 49ers.

Heavily incentive based so he is bank8ng on his Achilles rehabbing well.

Wish he had gone to another division tbh.

  • Author

Watkins to the Chiefs as Mahomes' new toy. VERY interesting. Sort of glad to see him out of the conference.

 

GB cut Nelson and sign Graham. 

Trumaine to jets looks likely.

Keenum to Broncos.

Bradford to Cards

Cousins to Vikes

Butler to Titans

Stewart to giants 

Wonder where Ndamakong Suh ends up?


On 15/03/2018 at 5:10 PM, Clintosaurus said:

Wonder where Ndamakong Suh ends up?

That is the 8nteresting one, still hearing nothing. He will still want top money and not sure many teams will pay him that. I reckon he will end up some where on a good amount guaranteed with lots of incentives.

  • Author
On 14/03/2018 at 10:16 AM, Gorgoroth said:

GB cut Nelson and sign Graham. 

Trumaine to jets looks likely.

Keenum to Broncos.

Bradford to Cards

Cousins to Vikes

Butler to Titans

Stewart to giants 

All the Qb movement has shown Foles won't get looked at until the preseason when a QB gets hurt somewhere in the league.

On 15/03/2018 at 5:10 PM, Clintosaurus said:

Wonder where Ndamakong Suh ends up?

Yup. 

1 hour ago, Dappa Dan said:

All the Qb movement has shown Foles won't get looked at until the preseason when a QB gets hurt somewhere in the league.

Yup. 

Didn’t some one offer a first rounder for him a while ago and Eagles said no?

 

We re signed John Sullivan which I’m stoked about, great centre and worked well with Goff.

 
  • Author
1 minute ago, Gorgoroth said:

Didn’t some one offer a first rounder for him a while ago and Eagles said no?

 

We re signed John Sullivan which I’m stoked about, great centre and worked well with Goff.

Nah they offered a second a couple of weeks back, and Eagles set their price at a first.

I'd be interested to see everyone's teams they want to see next year after the silly season. Rams would be up there, Watson and the Texans for me. Browns for the drama value. Vikings will be right in the mix... Won't be scared of Eagles, Cousins always carved us up.And 49ers.

43 minutes ago, Dappa Dan said:

Nah they offered a second a couple of weeks back, and Eagles set their price at a first.

I'd be interested to see everyone's teams they want to see next year after the silly season. Rams would be up there, Watson and the Texans for me. Browns for the drama value. Vikings will be right in the mix... Won't be scared of Eagles, Cousins always carved us up.And 49ers.

I’d love the Rams to get Suh on a one year deal at decent money and have a full crack at a SB. if he found form with Donald on the other side...


  • Author
3 hours ago, Gorgoroth said:

I’d love the Rams to get Suh on a one year deal at decent money and have a full crack at a SB. if he found form with Donald on the other side...

I thought the same thing with Cox.

Do the Rams have the cap space? Do you think maybe recruiting Suh might not lead to greater production? I know I think Cox as the alpha with a rotation of DTs to help out led to great success... why not stick with it.

There's a bit of movement hey ... Green Bay let go of Rodgers favourite receiver in Jordy Nelson.  Well,  more to the point,  they offered him such a low deal that it seems that they were ushering him out the door.  It's a ruthless business. 

At least we've finally brought in a decent tight-end in Jimmy Graham.  Muhammad Wilkerson is a welcome addition as well.  The new GM seems to have changed the thinking with regards to free agents - and not within time. 

The Raiders aren't paying Nelson that much (15mil over 2 years) ... I would have found a way to keep him or those dollars. 

Edited by Macca

9 hours ago, Dappa Dan said:

I thought the same thing with Cox.

Do the Rams have the cap space? Do you think maybe recruiting Suh might not lead to greater production? I know I think Cox as the alpha with a rotation of DTs to help out led to great success... why not stick with it.

Just under 30mil in cap space, gotta sign Donald yet tho.

8 hours ago, Macca said:

There's a bit of movement hey ... Green Bay let go of Rodgers favourite receiver in Jordy Nelson.  Well,  more to the point,  they offered him such a low deal that it seems that they were ushering him out the door.  It's a ruthless business. 

At least we've finally brought in a decent tight-end in Jimmy Graham.  Muhammad Wilkerson is a welcome addition as well.  The new GM seems to have changed the thinking with regards to free agents - and not within time. 

The Raiders aren't paying Nelson that much (15mil over 2 years) ... I would have found a way to keep him or those dollars. 

Jimmy Graham I think has been average for a few years, got ok towards the end of this year. Thought his time at Seattle was not as good as at the saints.

8 hours ago, layzie said:

I’m wondering where Mathieu is going to end up.

Texans I believe he signed with.


  • Author
On 17/03/2018 at 6:51 PM, Gorgoroth said:

I’d love the Rams to get Suh on a one year deal at decent money and have a full crack at a SB. if he found form with Donald on the other side...

 

On 18/03/2018 at 8:07 AM, Gorgoroth said:

Just under 30mil in cap space, gotta sign Donald yet tho.

 

21 hours ago, Gorgoroth said:

Suh to visit the rams!

My god... When I heard he liked the Eagles I laughed... It's not fair to the rest of the comp having Suh and Cox on the one Dline... Suh and Donald is even MORE unfair.

1 minute ago, Dappa Dan said:

 

 

My god... When I heard he liked the Eagles I laughed... It's not fair to the rest of the comp having Suh and Cox on the one Dline... Suh and Donald is even MORE unfair.

Only unfair if he goes anywhere but to the Rams... ha ha

  • Author
Just now, Gorgoroth said:

Only unfair if he goes anywhere but to the Rams... ha ha

Seriously though... How do you score against a team with those DLs AND those corners. If those spots are 10/10... then what grade do you put on their linebackers and safeties?


6 minutes ago, Dappa Dan said:

Seriously though... How do you score against a team with those DLs AND those corners. If those spots are 10/10... then what grade do you put on their linebackers and safeties?

We need to stop the run game. Suh helps with that... besides, I’m greedy.

  • Author
3 hours ago, Gorgoroth said:

We need to stop the run game. Suh helps with that... besides, I’m greedy.

... Come on... Why else are we into NFL.

59 minutes ago, Dappa Dan said:

... Come on... Why else are we into NFL.

If he comes to the Rams, I reckon it would be on a one year deal to try and get a SB, It would be worth a bit but not too much as Donald is going to suck a lot of that cap space.

 
  • Author
4 hours ago, Gorgoroth said:

If he comes to the Rams, I reckon it would be on a one year deal to try and get a SB, It would be worth a bit but not too much as Donald is going to suck a lot of that cap space.

It don't matter what you say... Suh and Donald. Suh and Donald....

Cox and Jernigan? meh.

I'm not saying Cox isn't in Donald's league. And I'm not saying that the DL defines an entire defense. I'm saying what isn't being spoken about is that the Rams weak side of the ball is defense. That's their WEAK side. You can't do much better than Peters, Talib, Donald and Suh... It probably won't even matter who your safeties and LBs are.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies