Jump to content

Featured Replies

A Detroit win would've given a little breathing room for the vikes. I'd prefer to win the division then have Green Bay lose it if that makes sense. One question that was raised on Minnesota radio. Would you prefer to win the division and possibly play seattle at home? Or take the wild card spot and play the NFC East winner which at the moment is Washington. I'd take Washington over playing seattle. 

 

I get to see the first 20 mins before I leave for work and so far I've seen Jenkins get smashed by our own player... Looked in a bad way, not what you want against the cards.

 

oh well, gotta avoid this area til I've watched the games.

 

The top 5 all picked up 2 points this week with a few of us breathing a sigh of relief that the Panthers got up ...

Leaderboard in the comp

7 - Gorgoroth, cowboy_from_ hell

6 - JV7, Georgiou R.R. Martin

4 - Macca

1 - titan_uranus

0 - The rest

Who'd have thought a 5-0 team would turn around and be 6-6... This falcon side is cooked. Wild card spot is good as gone.. 

 

Seattle looking like the Seattle of old

Philly ? What a turn around  


Wow we got spanked. Yes we had 3 of our best defenders injured and the refs didn't help but it didn't matter. Seattle flogged us. They have a much improved passing game then they did in their Super Bowl year and Wilson can still take off. AP wins us games but no RB will get you close to a Super Bowl. Teddy needs to take over but our offensive line is filthy bad. Pats are now the #3 seed. It's amazing, all that winning and they drop a couple and a pats team away from foxbourough in the championship game could be huge.

2 hours ago, JV7 said:

Who'd have thought a 5-0 team would turn around and be 6-6... This falcon side is cooked. Wild card spot is good as gone.. 

 

Seattle looking like the Seattle of old

Philly ? What a turn around  

The NFC East winner may well suit a team that has the best wild-card record. At the moment it's the Vikings which would mean the Packers would then face Seattle (if the standings remained the same as they are now)

That week 17 game between the Packers & Vikings could have another new meaning to it :ph34r:

38 minutes ago, cowboy_from_hell said:

Wow we got spanked. Yes we had 3 of our best defenders injured and the refs didn't help but it didn't matter. Seattle flogged us. They have a much improved passing game then they did in their Super Bowl year and Wilson can still take off. AP wins us games but no RB will get you close to a Super Bowl. Teddy needs to take over but our offensive line is filthy bad. Pats are now the #3 seed. It's amazing, all that winning and they drop a couple and a pats team away from foxbourough in the championship game could be huge.

Yeah, the Pats faltering has changed everything in the AFC ... I can see New England dropping a couple more with that banged up offense.

Seattle are the most dangerous team in the NFC - they can win anywhere and won't be overawed in any way. Wilson has really stepped things up - he's always been a talent and seems to really like pressure.

Rams fire Cignetti as they are 31st in offence. 

Gregg Rosenthal tweeted a pearler 

"Fisher and Snead haven't put up a top 20 offence in years or points in four seasons in St. Louis. But it's Cignettis fault"

 

the he guy replacing him is the TE coach who hasn't done a lot of play calling... FML.

 

some decent games, the skins/ cowboys was terrible until the last two minutes.

 

saints were stiff not to win.

 

Thursday night football is another interesting match-up (Vikes @ Arizona)

A few other good games but the SNF game with the Pats @ Houston is another vital game. 7mate games are Steelers @ Bengals (early) and Cowboys @ Packers (late)

Week 14 games (1 point only)

Leaderboard in the comp

7 - Gorgoroth, cowboy_from_ hell

6 - JV7, Georgiou R.R. Martin

4 - Macca

1 - titan_uranus

0 - The rest


1 minute ago, Gorgoroth said:

I was spewing when the panthers got up. I'd have the lead to myself!!!

Yep, and I can't believe I'm still within striking distance ... the first 2 years saw a lot of us pick up 3 points in week 17 so if that trend continues, it will pay to be in the lead going into the last week.

I'm going to have to "win out" in any case because I reckon 11 points or more will win it ... but ya never know.

Jenkins and Kendricks join the injured list at the Rams. It's getting pretty long. I think the Lions will beat us at home. 

My best mate is a lions fan, this is going to hurt.

Seattle, Pats, Giants... 3rd tip was tough this week.

(Carolina surely due for a loss, Falcons due for a win ? ) :P

Saints, Seahawks, pats.

 

normally with those three you would be confident and think it was a easy tipping round... Ha ha


Enjoyed this game, but the vikes shot themselves in the foot so many times! They really should have won this game or at worse forced it to OT. 

terrible choice to give the op for the sack, just kick the bloody FG.

Ah man we had that game. Two fumbles and missed interceptions killed us. That's the second game tying/winning drive that was stopped by a strip sack. Dunno why we didn't spike the ball and kick the FG and go to over time. Teddy was really good after last weeks disaster.

 

Seattle

Detroit

Pats

1 hour ago, cowboy_from_hell said:

Ah man we had that game. Two fumbles and missed interceptions killed us. That's the second game tying/winning drive that was stopped by a strip sack. Dunno why we didn't spike the ball and kick the FG and go to over time. Teddy was really good after last weeks disaster.

 

Seattle

Detroit

Pats

I get the bit where the Vikes want to get closer for the field goal ... they can't throw it in the field of play (with 13 seconds remaining) but a "sack" isn't counted on - that's worst case scenario.

Everything is just about a risk in this sport and I suppose without risk there's no reward. You're not out of it cbh and that's a decent effort by your blokes in Arizona.

I can support the decision to go for it on 3rd down. A 48 yard field goal to go to OT isn't exactly great odds of winning the game. The FG is probably 90% and winning in over time against a good team on the road is probably about 40% depending on the coin toss. A quick out increases the odds of the FG and you never know when you'll get a blown coverage and the winning TD. 

What seemed to be the issue from what I've read was Norv's play call. There wasn't a lot of help for the O line and there seemed to be a lot of receivers in the middle of the field when the pass could only go to the sideline. 

A bad mistake and loss for Teddy but otherwise a good game and learning point for him. Unless they create an unbelievable defense I can't see Teddy winning much if he progresses to Alex Smith style safe QB. Running the ball is fine but you need at least enough of a pass threat to open up the run. 

Anyway, the last 2 Thursday nights combined with the Bears missing FG's and throwing a win last week has led me to my continued belief that the rest of the NFC North only exists to support the Packers. Because just when they start looking awfully shaky the other 3 teams all conspire to gift them the division. 

I guess it's better than the AFC East where the teams just roll over for the Pats every year besides a Rex Ryan team that decides to make it more comical before losing. 

On 09/12/2015 at 9:01 PM, Gorgoroth said:

Rams fire Cignetti as they are 31st in offence. 

Gregg Rosenthal tweeted a pearler 

"Fisher and Snead haven't put up a top 20 offence in years or points in four seasons in St. Louis. But it's Cignettis fault"

 

the he guy replacing him is the TE coach who hasn't done a lot of play calling... FML.

 

some decent games, the skins/ cowboys was terrible until the last two minutes.

 

saints were stiff not to win.

He's reached Neeld level in the press conferences as well. 

The only saving grace for him might be that the franchise is suffering through similar turmoil as San Diego with uncertainty about their future. And maybe the Bradford-Foles situation wasn't his choosing. 

Either way I can't see how the Rams would let Fisher be in charge of the next OC or develop the QB of the future they surely must draft. 


6 hours ago, Georgiou R.R. Martin said:

He's reached Neeld level in the press conferences as well. 

The only saving grace for him might be that the franchise is suffering through similar turmoil as San Diego with uncertainty about their future. And maybe the Bradford-Foles situation wasn't his choosing. 

Either way I can't see how the Rams would let Fisher be in charge of the next OC or develop the QB of the future they surely must draft. 

I agree, but thought it may have just been me seeing it through angry eyes.

they won't sack him now, but years end they must. I think they are waiting to see where the team will be before signing a new coach.

Seattle

Giants

Pittsburgh

17 hours ago, Macca said:

Seattle

Giants

Pittsburgh

Taking a risk macca ? 

 
11 minutes ago, JV7 said:

Taking a risk macca ? 

Well, sort of ...

I don't fancy the Pats, Detroit, Saints or the Colts and I do rate Pittsburgh & the Giants (at least for this week anyway)

Whether that all converts to me picking up a precious point is another thing though :ph34r:

Seattle - with the amazing stat of Jimmy Clausen becoming one of only a few QB's to face the same opponent on a different team. He failed to score last time with the Bears in week 3.

Washington

New England


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 89 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 328 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies