http://www.afl.com.au/tabid/208/default.aspx?newsid=89584

http://www.afl.com.au/tabid/208/default.aspx?newsid=89584

I thought Buddy was still carrying a suspension for Round 1 ?

I thought Buddy was still carrying a suspension for Round 1 ?

The original Afl.com.au article listed Buddy in the headline and then 5 mins later was changed. I made the necessary changes to the title of the thread.

The original Afl.com.au article listed Buddy in the headline and then 5 mins later was changed. I made the necessary changes to the title of the thread.

They must keep up to date via Demonland....

It's no wonder this site is highly ranked D'land.

Here's the proof:

Buddy

Not Buddy

Batemans out as well, wont get the Hawks at a better time

Both of them will be seriously short of a gallop; the Hawks can play them at their peril.

Now the Sqawkers I won't underate but we certainly will have a better game of it than previous season openings

Edited February 16, 201016 yr by belzebub59

Batemans out as well, wont get the Hawks at a better time

Be careful!

I remember in round 1 2008, they were missing Crawford, Hodge, Lewis, Brown and couple of others...and still beat us by 104 points.

Bring on The Dawks with all there Available Players. Good.

Round 1 is a good time to play any team.

Be careful!

I remember in round 1 2008, they were missing Crawford, Hodge, Lewis, Brown and couple of others...and still beat us by 104 points.

That's what i was thinking.

I actually would have liked them to come at us full strength. It bothers me when a team has half it's side out, we get close (or battle manfully) and then people suggest that they "weren't at full strength anyway." Also it kind fo shows us where we need to improve.

For that reason, I can't wait to see us up against the Cats at HOPEFULLY full strength. We find out a lot about the 22 that week. I remember Bailey said something like this last season.