Jump to content

Anyone for cricket?

Whispering_Jack
Whispering_Jack
in Other Sports

Featured Replies

I think Perth is a very poor pitch at the moment.

Melbourne seems to be one of the better ones now. Certainly better than two decades ago, even prior to the drop-ins.

  • Quote
    •  
    Melbourne seems to be one of the better ones now. Certainly better than two decades ago, even prior to the drop-ins.

    It was a joke back then when the cooch grass caught some type of fungus and pitch was rubble.

    There is still a concern about the consistency of bounce in the MCG drop ins.

    Regardless the wicket quality list IMO is

    Sydney

    Brisbane

    Adelaide

    Melbourne

    Launceston

    Perth

  • Quote
    It was a joke back then when the cooch grass caught some type of fungus and pitch was rubble.

    There is still a concern about the consistency of bounce in the MCG drop ins.

    Regardless the wicket quality list IMO is

    Sydney

    Brisbane

    Adelaide

    Melbourne

    Launceston

    Perth

    Certainly agree with Sydney on top. In terms of return of test results in the last 10 years, I wonder which city/wicket comes out on top?

  • Quote
    •  
    It was a joke back then when the cooch grass caught some type of fungus and pitch was rubble.

    There is still a concern about the consistency of bounce in the MCG drop ins.

    Regardless the wicket quality list IMO is

    Sydney

    Brisbane

    Adelaide

    Melbourne

    Launceston

    Perth

    Isn't Bellerive Oval in Hobart?

    You got the list pretty right there though. Maybe Hobart above Melbourne. But defintely Sydney and Brisbane are top 2, and Perth is bottom.

    Certainly agree with Sydney on top. In terms of return of test results in the last 10 years, I wonder which city/wicket comes out on top?

    You piqued my interest HT. Here's the data for matches since 1995:

    SCG: Only 1 draw since 1995 (vs India 2004), 14 results in same period

    MCG: Only 1 draw since 1995 (vs Sth Africa 1997), 12 results in same period

    Adelaide: 2 draws since 1995, 12 results in same period

    Perth: 2 draws since 1995, 11 results in same period

    Gabba: 3 draws since 1995, 10 results in same period

    Hobart: 2 draws in its 8 matches since 1989

  • Quote
    Isn't Bellerive Oval in Hobart?

    You got the list pretty right there though. Maybe Hobart above Melbourne. But defintely Sydney and Brisbane are top 2, and Perth is bottom.

    Correct. Stuff it. I tossed the coin. Called incorrectly. Thanks for that.

    You piqued my interest HT. Here's the data for matches since 1995:

    SCG: Only 1 draw since 1995 (vs India 2004), 14 results in same period

    MCG: Only 1 draw since 1995 (vs Sth Africa 1997), 12 results in same period

    Adelaide: 2 draws since 1995, 12 results in same period

    Perth: 2 draws since 1995, 11 results in same period

    Gabba: 3 draws since 1995, 10 results in same period

    Hobart: 2 draws in its 8 matches since 1989

    The results of a game often depend upon the quality of the teams playing, attitudes of the Captains, etc. If you are going to look at the results then you have to look at the components of each one. I reckon all of the Test results in Perth for the past 5 years or so have been on sub standard wickets. And I think its getting worse.

    However when you have over 1000 runs struck in a Test with less than 25 wickets taken over the 5 days then questions should be asked about the wicket. It happens way too often to pin it on the quality of the attacks.

  • Quote

    Correct. Stuff it. I tossed the coin. Called incorrectly. Thanks for that.

    The results of a game often depend upon the quality of the teams playing, attitudes of the Captains, etc. If you are going to look at the results then you have to look at the components of each one. I reckon all of the Test results in Perth for the past 5 years or so have been on sub standard wickets. And I think its getting worse.

    A 14-year sample is probably long enough to draw some decent conclusions. The key one is that some grounds get the 'short straw' when it comes to staging the high-profile touring sides, so that could have had an impact. the other problem is that the pitches can change quite a bit, but I still think it was a useful exercise.

  • Quote
    A 14-year sample is probably long enough to draw some decent conclusions. The key one is that some grounds get the 'short straw' when it comes to staging the high-profile touring sides, so that could have had an impact. the other problem is that the pitches can change quite a bit, but I still think it was a useful exercise.

    I dont think so for the current state of Test pitches. And the points are some of the issues you make undermine the value of the exercise particularly the last issue.

    The quality of a pitch can change dramatically over one year. Much depends upon the competence and integrity of ground management and administration. The English tour of the WI recently highlights this.

    I sometimes feel that curators are got at by Ground Management and TV rights stakeholders to provide "insurance" that the Test will go the full 5 days. They nullify the pitch for bowlers and effectively kill the contest between bat and ball by the end of day 1.

  • Quote
    You piqued my interest HT. Here's the data for matches since 1995:

    SCG: Only 1 draw since 1995 (vs India 2004), 14 results in same period

    MCG: Only 1 draw since 1995 (vs Sth Africa 1997), 12 results in same period

    Adelaide: 2 draws since 1995, 12 results in same period

    Perth: 2 draws since 1995, 11 results in same period

    Gabba: 3 draws since 1995, 10 results in same period

    Hobart: 2 draws in its 8 matches since 1989

    Thanks for that Titan. That is really interesting. I had a feeling Melbourne was up there for actual results. It confirms my thoughts on Sydney as one of the better wickets despite the return of 14 results.

    I agree with RR's assertion that curators maybe influenced by Ground management and stakeholders in TV rights - to some degree. There is a balance, but you would want 4-5 days of play evertime you host a Test Match. In particular at Melbourne and Sydney venues.

    I'd imagine management would be feeling quite nervous in the first two sessions of a test match. Crossing everything for a minimum of wickets to be taken.

  • Quote
    • 4 weeks later...
     

    Our shirts are getting worse and worse.

    Go back to the mid 90s!

  • Quote

    • 1 month later...

    Symonds GAWN.

    The only surprise for me is that he was ever back in the first place

  • Quote
    ;) Thanks for coming Queenie
  • Quote
    ;) Thanks for coming Queenie

    Yeah, you beat me by all of a minute you speedy bugger ;) :D !!!

  • Quote

    Discraceful.

    Playing old never was beens in the 20/20 insted of proven 20/20 specialists. serves the aust team right! BL = terrible and will probably cost a good young bowler their spot in the ashes! Time to retire.

    Don't get me started about hodge!

  • Quote

    It's not just Brett Lee. Ponting's no good at Twenty/20 either.

    I don't care though. Cricket is about test cricket. So long as we win the Ashes, does it really matter?

  • Quote
    It's not just Brett Lee. Ponting's no good at Twenty/20 either.

    I don't care though. Cricket is about test cricket. So long as we win the Ashes, does it really matter?

    Well, yes Cricket is about Test Match Cricket, if you listen to the scribes and those that love a Test. Much like me. :) And yes, the Ashes are very important.

    However, there are different forms of the game now. One Day and 20/20 have their own supporters and followers. Nations have players who suit different forms of the game.

    I agree with Monty in that it's a bit of a disgrace and it's a shambles in that the selectors ignore certain players that suit formats such as the 20/20. And some don't suit the 20/20 format.

    ie.

    IMO: -

    Brett Lee is not a 20/20 bowler.

    Brad Hodge suits the 20/20 format.

    Dirk Nannes suits the 20/20 format.

  • Quote

    The treatment of Hodge is bizarre. Despite getting another CA contract he's not picked for the Ashes or the 20/20 World Cup.

    Why are we giving him a contract if he's not good enough to make any of the squads? It's not like it's one of the encouragement award signings for a youngster.

    If he's not good enough to make the Test or 20/20 squads how is he good enough to get a contract? Put another way, if he's good enough to get a contract how is he not good enough for the Test or 20/20 squads?

    I'm not sure I would have taken him on the Ashes tour but I'd certainly have taken him to the 20/20 World Cup - he's one of the best.

    PS. Since we're talking of Victorians, how many more chances does David Hussey have to establish himself as a quality player at international level?

  • Quote
    If he's not good enough to make the Test or 20/20 squads how is he good enough to get a contract? Put another way, if he's good enough to get a contract how is he not good enough for the Test or 20/20 squads?

    Indeed.

    I'm not sure I would have taken him on the Ashes tour but I'd certainly have taken him to the 20/20 World Cup - he's one of the best.

    Yes. He averages around 55 at 20/20 level, which puts him second to none for Australia at 20/20 level.

    PS. Since we're talking of Victorians, how many more chances does David Hussey have to establish himself as a quality player at international level?

    Good point. I think the selectors are in for some turbulent times before this years Australian Summer.

  • Quote

    Good point. I think the selectors are in for some turbulent times before this years Australian Summer.

    After we lose the Ashes?

  • Quote
    After we lose the Ashes?

    If we lose the Ashes. Definitely. I think they will face further media & public scrutiny regardless. Not necessarily with regard to the Test Squad. But the 20/20 and one day squads, some of their selections or non-selections of players in form are puzzling from my point of view, especially given their reasons. In particular with regards to the selections/non-selections of Andrew Symonds, Brad Hodge & Brett Lee to name a few.

    Edited by High Tower

  • Quote

    I'm very worried about our chances in the Ashes.

    My main worry is our poor technique and approach against the spinners.

    I can see Monty and Swann causing us lots of bother.

    I reckon our guys should attack them from ball one. Blocking and waiting for the loose ball is doomed for disaster.

    The Poms will provide Spinners' pitches. We should have picked Jason Krezja(?spelling). We have no-one who'll trouble them.

    Hauritz isn't bad, but Pietersen will hit him off his length.

    Bopara looks a danger with the bat.

    The big x-factor is Hughes. If he comes off in a big wAy, as well he might, that'll help us a lot. Don't know what he's like against the spinners.

    I'm worried.

  • Quote
    • 3 weeks later...
     

    We're probably down one batsman all things being considered, especially now that Watson is injured....yet again.

    Hughes's biggest issues may well be the sharp bounce, given that he got out twice in the trial game to short pitched stuff from Harmison.

    And our spinner is quite useless. The question is do they risk going in with the four quicks or play a useless spinner?

  • Quote

    We have a spinner?

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 11

      Round 11, the second week of The Sir Doug Nicholls Round, kicks off on Thursday night with the Cats hosting the Bulldogs at Kardinia Park. Geelong will be looking to to continue their decade long dominance over the Bulldogs, while the Dogs aim to take another big scalp as they surge up the ladder. On Friday night it's he Dreamtime at the 'G clash between Essendon and Richmond. The Bombers will want to avoid another embarrassing performance against a lowly side whilst the Tigers will be keen to avenge a disappointing loss to the Kangaroos. Saturday footy kicks off as the Blues face the Giants in a pivotal clash for both clubs. Carlton need to turn around their up and down season while GWS will be eager to bounce back and reassert themselves as a September threat. At twilight sees the Hawks taking on the Lions at the G. Hawthorn need to cement themselves in the Top 4 but they’ll need to be at their best to challenge a Brisbane side eager to respond after last week’s crushing loss to the Dees on their home turf. The first of the Saturday night double headers opens with North Melbourne up against the high-flying Magpies. The Roos will need a near-perfect performance to trouble a Collingwood side sitting atop the ladder.

        • Thanks
      • 189 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Sydney

      The two teams competing at the MCG on Sunday afternoon have each traversed a long and arduous path since their previous encounter on a sweltering March evening in Sydney a season and a half ago. Both experienced periods of success at various times last year. The Demons ran out of steam in midseason while the Swans went on to narrowly miss the ultimate prize in the sport. Now, they find themselves outside of finals contention as the season approaches the halfway mark. The winner this week will remain in contact with the leading pack, while the loser may well find itself on a precipice, staring into the abyss. The current season has presented numerous challenges for most clubs, particularly those positioned in the middle tier. The Essendon experience in suffering a significant 91-point loss to the Bulldogs, just one week after defeating the Swans, may not be typical, but it illustrates the unpredictability of outcomes under the league’s present set up. 

        • Clap
        • Love
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 4 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Brisbane

      “Max Gawn has been the heart and soul of the Dees for years now, but this recent recovery from a terrible start has been driven by him. He was everywhere again, and with the game in the balance, he took several key marks to keep the ball in the Dees forward half.” - The Monday Knee Jerk Reaction: Round Ten Of course, it wasn’t the efforts of one man that caused this monumental upset, but rather the work of the coach and his assistants and the other 22 players who took the ground, notably the likes of Jake Melksham, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kozzie Pickett but Max has been magnificent in taking ownership of his team and its welfare under the fire of a calamitous 0-5 start to the season. On Sunday, he provided the leadership that was needed to face up to the reigning premier and top of the ladder Brisbane Lions on their home turf and to prevail after a slow start, during which the hosts led by as much as 24 points in the second quarter. Titus O’Reily is normally comedic in his descriptions of the football but this time, he was being deadly serious. The Demons have come from a long way back and, although they still sit in the bottom third of the AFL pack, there’s a light at the end of the tunnel as they look to drive home the momentum inspired in the past four or five weeks by Max the Magnificent who was under such great pressure in those dark, early days of the season.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Southport

      The Southport Sharks came to Casey. They saw and they conquered a team with 16 AFL-listed players who, for the most part, wasted their time on the ground and failed to earn their keep. For the first half, the Sharks were kept in the game by the Demons’ poor use of the football, it’s disposal getting worse the closer the team got to its own goal and moreover, it got worse as the game progressed. Make no mistake, Casey was far and away the better team in the first half, it was winning the ruck duels through Tom Campbell’s solid performance but it was the scoreboard that told the story.

        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Sydney

      Just a game and percentage outside the Top 8, the Demons return to Melbourne to face the Sydney Swans at the MCG, with a golden opportunity to build on the momentum from toppling the reigning premiers on their own turf. Who comes in, and who makes way?

        • Thanks
      • 452 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Brisbane

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse a famous victory by the Demons over the Lions at the Gabba.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Clap
        • Love
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 35 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All