Earl Hood

An alternative might have been to bring in a few Casey players who were in form and rest and rehab a few banged up players and a few other players who were totally out of form. Instead we hung on with the same battle weary crew playing an ever more defensive, static game plan that was asking to be over run by any side willing and able to take a risk and run with the ball. Goody talked about the challenges of being the hunted vs the Hunter this season but in my mind the first people to blink was the coaching group with their game plan that resembled a hybrid of Mick Malthouse’s 2010 and Paul Roos in 2005 - defensive, contested, boundary line hugging, ignore the corridor, stoppage footy at every opportunity. The Dogs in 2016, then the Tigers blew slow, contested, stoppage footy away in 2019 and 2020. Then in 2021 when we demolished Geelong in the Prelim that marked the end of measured, possession footy I thought. The Cats & Pies have gone ultra offensive, running and moving the ball forward at all costs along with Freo and the Swans and just about everyone else with varying degrees of success against us. In short in my mind the coaching group bears much of the responsibility for where we ended up through game plan, and team selection.

The DARE has been deliberately coached out of the side. It is forbidden, not part of our game plan. The side has been drilled to relentlessly play the defensive percentages, kick down the line for Max to mark or knock it out and set up for the throw in and repeat. Kick long to the fwd pocket basically to get an out of bounds again, then hope for a goal from the throw in. It mostly works but not against the best sides who read what we are doing and start to congregate around where they know the ball is going then intercept and run and take risks to get the ball forward quickly with low passes into their fwd 50.

I saw him do that same thing at training about 6 weeks ago. It took him 10 minutes to recover. Got no idea what that is about except he has an ankle with a mind of its own sometimes.

Gee so many conservative plays kicking down the line when a switch was on to spread their defence. Goody relentlessly plays the predictable % play I know but we could have blown them away that quarter with some bold play.

Indeed I have just landed at Heathrow Uncle, on this most sombre of occasions, having been given a heads up by the Palace early yesterday that I should hasten to Balmoral as Her Majesty was slipping away, unfortunately all too late. The Queen is Dead, Long Live King Charles! I am assuming, like Federal Parliament the AFL finals have been postponed for 2 weeks, this is no time for mere games of sport after all.

Harmes in the middle to tag Lachie Neale, Brayshaw back to the wing. Tracc to play majority half forward if he is 80% fit. Dunstan onto the bench. Freo debuted a forward kid last Saturday so I would be tempted to give Van Rooyan a crack up forward. Max to play majority first ruck and stay behind the ball. LJ not sure what to do with him, he is not doing a lot. Anyway it’s all academic, knowing Goody he will trust his system and go in unchanged if players are deemed fit.

Spargo in hospital, scans on knees for Fritsch, Melk, Tracy according to Sam Edmund. We are looking a bit banged up after one final.

6 Oliver 5 May 4 Fritsch 3 Gawn 2 Harmes 1 Petty

A lot of basic skill errors, we should used to this pressure footy.

At the Grace Darling for pre game dinner. It’s busy, loud and my order is taking ages. Better have another drink.

Go for it Uncle. If you are still conscious!

And the Carlton forward coach might think to make sure they have a couple of crumbers in front of the forwards when they send in those repeated helicopter kicks that will inevitably get punched forward. Everytime there were 2 Pies and zero Blues to take the ball away.

6 Oliver 5 Petracca 4 Lever 3 Fritsch 2 Pickett 1 Brayshaw

Coach’s orders?

Keep going let’s make it an 80 pt drubbing so we play first final at the G!

Rogering?

6 Melksham 5 Brayshaw 4 Oliver 3 May 2 Hunt 1 Gawn

Set shots killing is again!

Tuned in at the 10 minute mark of the first quarter and within 10 minutes witnessed at least 3 Jamie Elliot tackles and guess what they were all “ play on”! FMD it’s a joke.

I don’t see it that way at all. What we have seen is replicated often in the civil courts at least, particularly by anyone with deep pockets, willing to keep appealing through the various levels of the court system. Guilty at one level, don’t worry appeal to a higher court and bingo the finding can get reversed.

And every time I look at the vision I see a guy flying in late, not genuinely contesting for the mark and hitting a player in the head. Anyone who has played footy knows what Cripps was doing, making the guy earn the mark. He was too late to contest for the mark and these elite players earn their living making split second decisions to contest a ball or evade a tackle.

Apparently there is no mention in the Magna Carta about choosing to bump!

That Johnson kid was stiff, those 4 goals all had high degrees of difficulty and kept them in it.

So if we had won by 2 goals Oliver would have got 8 votes and De Goey would have got zero because he was supposed to be on Oliver?

Thanks for posting that. To me the rules would appear to clear Hibberd who had no prior opportunity in the first quarter by any stretch of the imagination (18.6.2.). He had barely picked the ball up when it was dislodged by the tackler. And Viney was hard done by after receiving a handball in the last quarter in heavy traffic and immediately trying to get it to his boot only to be tackled and missing his foot 18.6.3 (a) and (b)! That’s 2 gifted goals right there.