Everything posted by Willmoy1947
-
NON-MFC: Rd 23 2023
OOOO AHHH Not allowed say that...😄
-
Farewell Brodie Grundy
Well, i'll tell you, but that is in the next chapter. "Grundy paints the town red and blue"
-
Farewell Brodie Grundy
Can well understand why we were able to pick him up after last night's game spray during debacle on X . He just didn't want to stay there.
-
The 2023 AFL Fixture
Rash generalisations will not solve the problems.
-
The 2023 AFL Fixture
Certain AFL Umpires, yes i do. Especially to certain players at MFC yes i do. When dumbfounding decisions, and pivotal changes of momentum are made to the detriment of one club especially, yes i do. Not just me noticing......
-
The 2023 AFL Fixture
We couldn't possibly have got a favourable fixture when your team gets penalized every week by inept, bias umpires who practise their newly found powers and vague rule variations that create more perplexed supporters including the bottom of the pile media cult lovers and officials who kiss their own self importance where it don't smell. Bit premature for me.
- PREGAME: Rd 23 vs Hawthorn
- PREGAME: Rd 23 vs Hawthorn
-
The Run Home
Spare a moment and a last comment on an individual that played his heart out in last week's cheat fest. Petracca is this man who i was lucky enough to view in a little different light after his kick for goal. His look took on so many different emotions which i found so in depth, so meaningful, so sad but in the end so angrily determined. He took that kick on his shoulders as something quite personal and was clearly silently insulted that it was not allowed. We should all feel insulted that it wasn't allowed , and we should finish this without another loss.
- What are they saying at Glenferrie Road
- Trade Rumours 2023
-
Footyology: Comment on JVR tackle
I had a feeling Razor was getting overruled and didn't have that much impact in the last QTR.
-
Umpiring discrepancies
The instructions on interference are coming directly from the AFL and the Umpiring arm which is attached to it to combat Max's height and ability.
- POSTGAME: Rd 22 vs Carlton
-
Umpiring discrepancies
The AFL thought they could get away with one of their Pin up sides on a drug program by brushing it under the carpet, But when all of a sudden it became a cheating situation and a danger to players, it soon blew up, but did anyone from the AFL go, well of course not.
-
Umpiring discrepancies
If they have cleared everything then RELEASE EVERYTHING including all the filming, all the time and all the conversations.... Not just for us but for all the Other Clubs..
-
Umpiring discrepancies
Well this picture implicating the Coach says it all..... Hey boys let's have a picture so as that it verifies what happened, right Caleb??
-
Umpiring discrepancies
And i think he also reacted to what was said to him by the Field Umpire which we do not know because the record of that interaction has and still is being withheld from the Media and the Public.
-
Umpiring discrepancies
Well, candidly, you should have watched all the game.
- POSTGAME: Rd 22 vs Carlton
-
POSTGAME: Rd 22 vs Carlton
Just a shout out to all our players. I will never single out one of our players as having been responsible for us losing a game. That's what we leave to all the other Clubs to do. We are not like that and that is why i support our Club. Any player in any team can kick to the left or right of a goal post but not many of them can kick through the middle and still have it called a minor score. This game was not lost by our Team and i squarely put the loss on the Umpires involved and the AFL. It's a shame and a disgrace. I have had this feeling all through the year, and the more exposure our players give to a rag tag bunch of purported Media Experts, the more they twist what was said into lying Head Lines. Do not get hung up on Red Herrings of points that should have been goals and stay with the point that WAS a Goal.
- POSTGAME: Rd 22 vs Carlton
-
POSTGAME: Rd 22 vs Carlton
THE PETRACCA GOAL Can anyone clear up for me three things:- The first pertains to why the AFL official last two minutes of the game on Youtube now does NOT include all of the last two minutes. It is in fact abridged to not include viewing of how long the conversation was between the goal umpire and the Field umpire No 23 after Petracca had kicked the winning goal. What is there to hide by not including this very important part, and actually how long they spoke for? Secondly, from what could be seen from the fence side behind the goal area it is apparent to some that there was more words spoken than just what was understood to have been said. Do others understand this to be the case? Why was that? Third of course we have the situation that there is only one angle of viewing that has been shown to the public. Why?
- POSTGAME: Rd 22 vs Carlton
- POSTGAME: Rd 22 vs Carlton