rjay
Life Member
-
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Currently
Viewing Topic: May to Tribunal
Everything posted by rjay
-
Dees for Punt Rd
So they leave, it's no big deal. Collingwood left Vic Park...the council can make it a community hub and play local footy there. Take down the fences...walk the dogs. It's not much of a threat...what do the City of Melbourne get by having Richmond at Punt Road?
-
CHANGES : Rd 08 vs St. Kilda
I need to read the fine print...
-
CHANGES : Rd 08 vs St. Kilda
Brayshaw?
-
Dylan Shiel
Must admit I have thought about this one 'dazz'...the only way we could take him is if EFC wanted him out and we got him for chips and they paid a big part of his salary. A bit of a Treloar type deal I guess. Not sure I can see it happening though.
-
Secrets to Knock Off Unstoppable Dees
I would rather them (the media) spending time thinking they've cracked the code to beat us... ...than the old talk of you can't trust Melbourne or even worse, basket case Melbourne. Enjoy!
-
Farewell Luke Jackson
I'm not sure WC will be willing to pay the price...they are going into rebuild and 1 player is not going to do it for them. They will need a solid draft hand to build the list back up and spending their capital on Jackson doesn't add up.
-
Secrets to Knock Off Unstoppable Dees
He forgot the most important one. Infiltrate with COVID germ carriers...
- Is Yze under appreciated?
-
TEAMS: Rd 06 vs Richmond
- TEAMS: Rd 06 vs Richmond
Lucky you didn't bet the house on it 'WERRIDEE'... Brown > McDonald Dunstan & Smith < Viney & Lever ...but the side retains a sense of balance.- TEAMS: Rd 06 vs Richmond
I can't see us going in with Brown, Weid and Tommy 'A F'...it's just not going (shouldn't) to happen. No matter what the teams show.- CHANGES: Rd 06 vs Richmond
With Grimes out the Tiges defence is struggling and Brown would be a no brainer for me...- Ranking the Wing Dynamic Duos
He was a good but developing player at Freo, Langdon was playing like this by the way, just not the full product we now see. ...we identified him and worked for a few years to get him. We've now got him in his prime and he's been a great get. Our list management and recruiting team have done a great job. We got the good one...- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
To be fair round 1 went for 25 days this year...- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
Sorry 'Red', I had a quick look to see if someone had posted it. ...and yes, I was also thinking I hope it's not us.- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
I remember when they brought something similar into the Southern League, probably in the 90's... I was coaching and had been held up in the rooms for a minute when the game started, and I kid you not it was only a minute and when I got to the box I had an extra 2 players...the 2 biggest mouths in the club/competition. What are you 2 doing here - we've been sent off for swearing - that would be right.- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
I'm waiting for the first 50 to be given against a player raising his arms to guard the mark. You just know it's going to happen...- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
Poor old Frosty, he did well to hold it together. It was a poor decision but again the umpires haven't been helped by HQ. They've talked the talk for years about cutting out staging yet you see the Cats players (Danger & Hawkins) regularly doing it and Joe up in Brisbane making himself look like a goose... An occasion wet lettuce leave won't stop it. Get serious and hand out weeks on the sidelines, it will soon stop.- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
I think the rule change is fine 'Macca', the image of the player back in the day giving the umpire a mouth full had to go. What I don't like is the inconsistency of this particular rule and that Scott did nothing today to fix it, he in fact just made it worse. As said earlier by another poster the fault isn't with the umpire it is fairly with HQ.- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
Absolutely it is. If they really want to know why the umpire numbers are down maybe they should start looking a bit closer to home.- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
"As to what that level (of Dissent) looks like, that's up to the umpire to decide, but we've been really clear on this. We have unanimous support from all the clubs, all the leaders of clubs, and in fact, they want us to pay these free kicks. That is seriously a dumb comment from Scott...and a total cop out. For the players and clubs to be totally clear then how about the AFL be totally clear and transparent. Spell it out Brad...that's not clear, it's a clear cop out.- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
Yeah, it was against Oliver and in a funny way I think it started our run on. Oliver was really p...off and went for it at the centre bounce. The team went up a couple of levels from then on.- NON-MFC: Round 5, 2022
I think it's about time good old Joey Daniher got weeks for staging. It's gone well beyond the joke now Joe. At least the umpires are awake.- CHANGES: Rd 05 vs GWS
The only training shot of him I could find didn't show his knees, more an upper body shot. I was looking to see if he had strapping, have you seen a full body shot?- CASEY: Rd 03 vs Williamstown
If you watched the previous game then you will see (hear) it's a blessing there was no commentary. - TEAMS: Rd 06 vs Richmond