-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
So Brayshaw "should" have kicked in a different way, but given that a collision was inevitable, Maynard is excused from ensuring he doesn't negligently collect Brayshaw high?? He turned his shoulder into the point of his head!! So many other ways it could have played out safely if he took more care
-
Harmes Cops a Week
Then he'll get done for 6 months as an accomplice
-
TRAINING: Monday 8th May, 2023
Where did you find the training info? Or did you just show up knowing they train the same time roughly each week? I'm looking to go Wednesday morning at Gosch's but the club website is showing April 23 as the last advertised session. Any tips on what time I should show up?
- POSTGAME: Rd 06 vs Richmond
- GAMEDAY: Rd 06 vs Richmond
- GAMEDAY: Rd 06 vs Richmond
-
James Harmes
Think there was some confusion between posters. I will say that I never doubted you're a passionate supporter, that much is clear
-
James Harmes
The endless negative diatribe from 3165 borders on unhelpful rather than useful to debate though I honestly thought they were a troll for a while, but I'm thinking just a pessimistic supporter sadly
-
NON-MFC: Rd 05 2023
-
Hellish Inferno changed their profile photo
-
NON-MFC: Rd 01 2023
Cotchin and Nankervis. Usual suspects
-
What’s your Round 1 plans?
I'll be at the snow, sorry... But seriously, I will, skiing the slopes of Engelberg in Switzerland. But I'm actually bummed to miss it live, will just have to watch us rip the doggies a new a**ehole after the weekend (or while recuperating in hospital with a broken leg) Touch wood (on both accounts)
-
TRAINING: Tuesday 7th February 2023
-
TRAINING: Friday 13th January 2023
Did you clench before writing this?
-
The 2023 AFL Fixture
About time for an investigation into the AFL fixturing department to see what clubs they support and find any evidence of brown paper bags or "gifts" received from long lost relatives
-
Garry Lyon fails to call out Antisemitism
Hmm isn't that giving an excuse to the idiots that make racist comments on these articles? The problem seems to lie with them doesn't it A bit like saying a woman shouldn't have encouraged or drawn attention to unwanted sexual advances because they were wearing revealing clothes