La Dee-vina Comedia

After a turgid start, the article becomes quite interesting. Stick with it, folks.

Does she play for Casey or Frankston?

I find that Bowza kick mesmerising. I just keep watching it over and over.

I agree with you. However, just to clarify, is the Lewis incident with Viney directly related to vilification in that specific match?

Half! That's still about 80% more than I'll be able to identify.

Would it be OK to ask for a 191 point winning margin? It's embarrassing to have to point out that 186 is not our greatest losing margin ever. That (dis)honour belongs to the Melbourne team beaten by Fitzroy by 190 points in 1979. Final scores were Melbourne 6.12 48 to Fitzroy 36.22 238.

I think you're correct about the players using the traditional method more. But that may be as a result of where they were kicking from, rather than any change to the kicking technique. Fewer shots taken from deep in the forward pockets reduces the need for the round the corner kicks.

Not so sure I agree. Langdon and Hunter played their best games as a combination of wingmen in our last game. Was that because Jordon gave each of them a chop out? And he also played on ball and drifted forward. I'm not convinced Jordon will be the one who misses out. If it's a small forward who gives way for Pickett, it's out of Spargo and Chandler, neither of whom deserve to miss. If it's a midfielder, I would have thought Sparrow was at greater risk of losing his spot than Jordon. Either way, whoever misses out is very, very unlucky.

The Bulldogs seem to be in a world of pain. it doesn't matter how accurate you are if you aren't generating many shots on goal.

I wouldn't be shocked. Pickett has to come back in and I expect it will be "like for like". So, if Brown goes out, I expect a KPF like Tom McDonald to take his place, not Pickett. So, if it's not Chandler, who does Pickett replace?

It's a great read, but not sure I agree with this bit, " Plenty of late, hard hits, scuffles, following with the elbow when you lose out on a contested mark. Both teams played like they felt hard done by, which in turn created more scuffles, more malice, more venom in the contests." It's not what I saw.

Will be interesting if Chandler loses his spot to Pickett. If he does, I'll have to assume his vote came from Longmire.

It was interesting to see Rivers in the midfield rotations yesterday. I don't know if that was because he was playing on a specific person and followed him in there or not. But I can't recall us in the Goodwin era ever using one of the nominal seven defenders in a midfield role. As to changes, Pickett for Chandler who becomes the sub with Melksham being omitted. It's tough on Chandler, but he's effectively playing the Pickett role. If Brown is injured or needs to be rested, I'd bring in Tom McDonald. If Hibberd is injured or needs to be rested, I'd bring in Tomlinson.

I'm really curious as to what has been censored here. I'm conscious of the Demonland policy so am not asking for the censored word to be disclosed. However, is it simply just a case of a typo with the intention to write 'shut' being erroneously written? After all, the u and i are adjacent on a qwerty keyboard.

6. Oliver 5. Grundy 4. Petracca 3. Langdon 2. Hunter 1. Rivers Really sorry I couldn't also include Jordon.

Major League Baseball in the US now gives players a special patch to add to their uniform when they debut. It's all about the collectibles market. I expect the AFL will eventually follow suit. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-30/mlb-rookies-to-wear-debut-patches-bound-for-collectibles-market?utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&utm_source=twitter&cmpid=socialflow-twitter-business&utm_medium=social&utm_content=business#xj4y7vzkg

For those who follow US sport and the conference system, do the same teams remain in the same conferences every year? I would find it somewhat depressing if we went to two conferences and played against the same 9 teams every year and only against teams in the "other" conference in finals.

Ignoring Sam McClure for the moment (or always). I think the data presented here for all Victorian clubs, except North Melbourne, is impressive. For every club (except North) to have an average home crowd of over 24,000 is quite extraordinary. I can remember as a child growing up in the 70s looking at the newspaper summary of the weekends' games when all six were played at the same time on a Saturday. It used to include a figure showing attendances at each game with the total each round usually somewhere around 120,000 on a good weekend, so an average of 20,000 per game.

They've fed the hamster and it's back spinning the dynamo.

Mind you, it would be a bit surprising if the club wrote instead, "He's not noted for going at the ball hard, he's usually away from the contest and his follow-up at ground level is average". In other words, take all pre-game praise with a grain of salt and hope that he delivers on the main stage.

I like the way the company has referred to the tech person as the "Senior" Infrastructure technician to lend gravitas to how seriously they're taking this problem.

Not sure how big he is, but just on this single page alone the MFC says he's both 193cm and 194cm.

Mick Malthouse leads the pack for curmudgeonly commentary. But, DS, you're closing fast.

Also, people's expectations have changed. Most suburban grounds in the 60s and 70s had little seating, except for club members. The standing room allowed for bigger crowds, but it was far less comfortable overall.

I'm hoping it's reminiscent of John Coleman's.