Everything posted by monoccular
-
POSTGAME: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
Quite a bit od parallax there - would add another 50% = 15 meters. Still, can't expect a maggot to understand that, especially when no doubt instructed to add a bit to reverse kicks in the dying stages of games. I still feel that 'no mark' for backwards kicks would move the game on and stop some of these negative tactics.
-
Tackling
If the tackler lies on the ballgetter then surely it is in the back, and more so when a couple more jump on top. Encourage and protect the guy who gets the bloody ball, not the hovering vulture!! Yes, anyone who impedes the flow after a free should be a 50 meter .... far far more logical than those absurd “protected zone” inconsistently applied penalties. And whilst on those rolling 50s .... surely if the recipient bounces the ball on the run to the new mark, it should be play on straight away.
-
NON MFC: Round 14
..... but better than finishing 9th, which gives zero chance of advancing at all ?
- POSTGAME: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
- POSTGAME: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
- POSTGAME: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
- POSTGAME: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
- POSTGAME: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
- POSTGAME: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
- POSTGAME: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
- GAMEDAY: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
- GAMEDAY: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
- GAMEDAY: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
- GAMEDAY: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
- GAMEDAY: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
- GAMEDAY: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
- GAMEDAY: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
- GAMEDAY: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
- GAMEDAY: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
- GAMEDAY: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
- GAMEDAY: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
-
James Harmes is being wasted
Surely couldn’t consider tagging a match winner? Where did you dream up such an innovative option? Maybe a note to our coaching staff about this innovation would surprise them
-
TEAMS: Rd 14 vs St. Kilda
Hope they all have stand out games tomorrow. Will need to.
-
NON MFC: Round 14
Dogs being very Demonic .... one big quarter then ?
-
NON MFC: Round 14
What an amazing tactic. Is that legal?