monoccular
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by monoccular
-
I guess it would depend on what $$, and contract length, he consumed in comparison with the other two (Smith, Melksham). So hard to compare players when those factors have to be taken into account. For example if all 3 asked for exactly the same 2-3 year contracts, then Melksham would clearly be at the bottom end of the three. I wouldn't want to be a list manager - far too many variables to be taken onto account. Would anyone here? -
The developers of course would be required under copyright to pay substantial royalties to this site.
-
But we do need to go for what is available. see below BBB is NOT a high pack marking forward and we should realise that by now - he is an excellent LEAD UP marking forward and generally a reliable set shot .... we just need to change our delivery inside 50 play
-
So, DeeSpencer, I gather you aren't really likely to move to the City of Casey anytime soon. Max seemed to still be doing the defensive 50 drop back up until QB when that mongrel Cox 😎 repeatedly, and unpenalised, kneed him in the back, from which he really didn't recover.
-
-
-
Your Lordship - what does it say? Can’t open the link.
-
Hope he can spend another few years learning from / helping Goody.
-
Don’t know enough about GC$, but do they have a surplus of “his type”? Otherwise, if he is as good as some here seem to think, why would they let him go?
-
MFC! 🙄
-
Still no updates re the nature and status of his injury / injuries?
-
Finally, does anyone know, with certainly, the nature of the injury / injuries that killed his 2022, and their current status and prognosis? Surely this is the most important issue right now?
-
hang on ... we are NOT Essendon 🙄
-
Surely we all know that BB is not and never will be a strong pack breaking pack marking FF: great on the lead so we need to learn to do just that, kick to a lead (Harmes to leading BB Q3 2021 GF for example). Petty couod only be a better KPF than anyone else if he is played there. Maybe not quite yet, but why not later?
-
And your last sentence applies to both mental and physical preparedness. I believe they can find it again.
-
Well at least I hope and expect he will at least show a bit of flexibility in the game plan, or at very least reset what didn’t (for many reasons) work in 2022. Having competitive strong men up forward makes a huge difference and gives the mids confidence that every forward thrust won’t be immediately returned. Past tense - Franklin WAS a key forward, a great athlete but well past his prime.
-
Didn’t watch the ceremonials but did I hear correctly that Nathan Buckley was presenting the Norm Smith - the guy who regarded it with such esteem that he chucked it into the crowd? Amazing.
-
What a terrible terrible turnover. Game over if it wasn’t before.
-
And Melbourne 2000 😢
-
.. as May have been our #1 last year, but it wasn’t.
-
Frankenstein absolutely useless. I guess the new contract will satisfy him?
-
Come in Swans. Is Heeny’s diving mark goung to inspire and start the fire as Gus’ did last year?
-
Front in high tackle - no free. But one to Hawkins now.
-
Sadly reminiscent of 1988 or 2000
-
17-8 inside 50. MFC would be 1 goal 7 behinds.
