Jump to content

Eth

Members
  • Posts

    1,918
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Eth

  1. Perhaps, but I have simply stated the truth. His turnovers, particularly when he was running under no pressure, were very poor and cost us.

    I will add that he also kicked a pinpoint pass into the 50 for a mark and goal that took my breath away. The kid is amazing, but I stand by my call. He needs to improve his consistency by foot to compliment his other abilities and then he will be a multiple brownlow winner.

    Read what you quoted.

  2. Of course. We have a fair contender tonight in Bennell, and no doubt we'll see plenty more during the season. I'll back us to take it out.

    Oh yeah, forgot about that one, it was a great mark but somebody will probably take a better one.

  3. I agree it was a great game, but his shocking turnovers by foot really hurt at times. He really needs to work on that. Fortunately, he seems to be the type who puts a lot of work into his game, so we can hope that he will get better.

    Everybody had a stupid turnover tonight. It was the fact that Sculls got it 39 times that made him have more than the rest.

  4. I think we can almost award these now.

    Goal of the year: Jamie Bennell

    Non-goal of the year: Brad Green (it was a goal, replays proved it)

    Goal assist of the year: Ricky Petterd

    We're good at this.

  5. Words fail me...

    bang%20head%20here.gif

    My head's sore now.

    The umpire who overruled the first one should be sacked. I was at that end, and clearly hear the smack of leather on leather, even from Level 4. The replays showed it wasn't touched as well.

    And also, a paragraph from AFL.com's article on the game:

    The match is likely to be remembered as much for its close finish as for a number of contentious decisions that went the Bulldogs' way, especially in the last quarter.

  6. As has been suggested on here by several scribes, is Rivers being played now to make him a more valuable trade next season given that is the only way to enhance your list for the next two years.

    It is an interesting question. If we were to trade, given our accumulation of first round draft picks, what sort of players do we want. Once we have everyone up and running, where are our glaring weaknesses?

    Perhaps I could start with where we are strong: backs tall and medium; on ballers great once the young develop; forwards terrific potentially once we get them all back and JW matures.

    So what do we need? I still believe we badly need a David Neitz type of player ie large body, very strong, quick lead, strong mark, long accurate kick. There Is no-one on our list that's near that except maybe Fitzpatrick when he matures. Secondly, a second ruck. I don't believe either meesen or Spencer cut the mustard here. PJ potentiaaly might - it will be intersting to see how he performs at the weekend. Gawn is a long term (ie 3-5 years IMO) but extremely promising prospect but we need someone in the next 2-3 years capable of dominating finals football ie a Jolly type. I don't believe we have one on our list at the moment.

    What do others think? Any other gaps? Any players in particular we should target?

    John Anthony's out of favour at Collingwood, maybe he's worth looking into. And I also think Jamar's perfectly capable of dominating the ruck, but players like Johnson, Frawley, Dunn and some of the younger players (Gawn, Fitzy) are perfectly capable of playing ruck when required, although the last two will probably take a while.

    But I'd really like John Anthony in red and blue if Malthouse doesn't want him.

×
×
  • Create New...