Curry & Beer

and Jones, Vince and Brayshaw eat it

Yep. Unlike when we got Morton, Watts, Scully and Trengove, our team has plenty of spotlight-grabbers like Hogan, Viney and Brayshaw and these new guys get to just work they way into it like what happens at proper clubs.

Love it. He's just got that maniacal attack on the pill and the man and he's a solid unmovable object. It's looking like when you come against him, Jones, Viney, Petracca, Brayshaw and Vandenberg in the middle.. you are going to feel it, and the phrase 'bruise-free footy' will be just a memory

if it ain't broke

Feels to me that its our choice Parish/Oliver and the bombers will deffo take the other. Then Francis is the clear best of the remainders, so the top 5 is pretty locked in.

correct, edited

I'm not sure what 'authority' you are looking for but that's incorrect Emma Quayle, Herald Sun Callum Twomey, AFL Brett Anderson, SEN Sam Landsberger, Herald Sun ALL have us taking Oliver and Weideman http://www.smh.com.au/afl/trading-and-drafting/who-will-your-club-pick-in-the-afl-draft-20151123-gl5zr3.html http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-11-24/callum-twomeys-2015-phantom-draft http://www.sen.com.au/news/11-15/bretts-final-2015-afl-mock-draft#EZxsrLM4D81pRgV6.97 http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-draft-2015-sam-landsberger-predicts-how-the-top-10-will-unfold/news-story/6bd08586731275f0441b2509b1fe062e suggests that some sort of cat has gotten out of some sort of bag

I would suggest that in fact something HAS been leaked. In the last few days it's suddenly been all aboard the Oliver train

Clearly the beep test is very important as demonstrated by the record holders... 1 16.06 Billy Hartung 2013 2 16.02 Joshua Schoenfeld 2015 3 16.01 Caleb Daniel 2014 16.01 Jack Hiscox 2014 16.01 Brad Hill 2011 6 15.12 Will Hoskin-Elliott 2011 7 15.09 Nathan Drummond 2014 8 15.08 Tom Rischbieth 2005 15.08 Mark Berts 2000 10 15.07 Tom Sheridan 2011 15.07 Hayden Hector 2010

It's just that it is pretty unlikely that our preferred player at 25 will be gone at 29

because it's just impossible that one of the other 16 clubs could swoop in and offer Essendon more in a trade?

how do you know we didn't float that with Essendon and they said no deal we'll take 25 thanks we can tell them whatever we want but they don't have to accept it we wanted Melksham so we got him

how would you have any clue what we 'could' have done? We WANTED Melksham and Kennedy and that's what they COST. We can't just TELL a club what we would like to give up for their players.

What's the difference between Jake Melksham and Dom Tyson?

http://www.melbournefc.com.au/video/2015-10-15/jake-melksham-highlights

omfg

oh yeah great take a bloke that has been injured and another that has retired but served us brilliantly and call them fails then list some blokes we got for nothing

like most, I'm not able to get very enthused about this. What I do know though is that Roos and Co have generally knocked it out of the ball park with their trading and drafting the past 2 seasons, so I feel comfortable backing the play they have made here.

who cares if it is home or away, the hoodoo is broken fullstop

and about making the bloke in the other colour jumper experience pain. These are Viney's only interests.

Just started watching the game vs the cats again, in the first 10 seconds Viney chases Selwood to a congested sitution and just bowls him over so he can't get the pill, then you see him just grab selwood's foot while he is on the ground and kinda pull it, purely to annoy him, then Viney somehow gets the ball and dishes it to Jones for an inside 50. Absolutely set the tone of the matchup and the game itself in the first passage of play!

I reckon that's just a situation where people can't decide which one to give it to, so they have a bet each way Give it to Viney for 10 years, he was born for it