DeeSpencer

He’s an option but we need one more genuine tall in case Petty or JVR are both out.

We’d be in the prelim if we had Lord over T Mc the last two weeks. But I cant see Port giving him up with their current tall forward. Would be like us giving up JVR

Hawkins - won’t happen, can try. Riewoldt - not for me, he’s done. We need a fit, physical, agile role playing back up to JVR and Petty. Doesn’t have to be a world beater.

Thanks for saying it so I didn't. He barely had the coaches trust as a ruck/forward. He didn't have it as a forward/ruck. The SCG and full time ruck will both suit him perfectly and Sydney are desperate, but John Longmire's going to lose his freaking mind at some of the stuff he does if he doesn't change his ways.

He isn't a good kick. Poor decision maker with the ball, but a good competitor. I would've tried him as a pressure forward in the last 6 or so weeks just to see if he could thrive in a new role, but (assuming AMW gets another contract) we do have plenty of players in that role.

They do need to replace Lycett and probably Dixon who can't be trusted to be healthy, so it's not that crazy. It would also mean at least 1, if not both of Hayes and Teakle are on the trade block.

I don’t like the decision but I do have faith that if Disco can string an uninterrupted preseason together he’ll get first (and many) chances.

No and not saying he will be he couldn’t have had a worse first year unfortunately.

We should make Hail Mary offers to Allen, Ben King and Tom Lynch. We should offer the world for Harry McKay. Or trade for Chol, Finlayson, Darling, Lord, Waterman, Burgess, Kositschzke or Ash Johnson. Or Breust for some reason? In other words Ralphy has just repackaged a few posts in to a news article.

We’d likely have to pay half of it too, But if we’re a 50-75% chance of finding a player as good if not better for base wage and can clear 200k or so to help bring someone of quality in for another position isn’t that worth it?

As I said in another thread this isn’t a good decision. He’s soft, moves like treacle and plays without any flair or dare. He can only (barely) match up on 2m donkeys and the game isn’t going to get any slower. Nor are May or Lever going to get any quicker. Key backs have a strong success rate in mature agers and delisted players. Ok, Kye Turner hasn’t worked out, have another go. And above everything I just don’t think Tommo is happy. He wants to play regularly and barring a dramatic form turn around or injury to May and Lever he’s not going to.

A safe decision but not one I’d have made unless the cost of moving him on or of picking anyone else half decent up was entirely prohibitive. He plays a soft and shaky brand of football without any spirit, flair or joy. Seems to be mates with Gawn and letting Max make list management decisions has consistently proven to be a disaster.

1. Who did we have in reserve who would offer speed and run? Best we had was Laurie which I believe is the French word for turtle. 2. Our talls were banged up and clearly a threat of not making it through the game, a tall as sub was deemed necessary. Gawn’s broke toe is one thing, I’m sure there were others with doubts on their fitness (Fritsch, T Mc).

Darcy Moore is one of the best high marks in the game, he has a slight susceptibility to body contact which is why he’s better playing more zone. But his run and jump is elite. Watch this cut up of O’Sullivans game. Excellent positioning. Gorgeous hands at ground level, the way he holds, shimmies and releases handballs is better than just about any mid in this draft. But starting from the first few contests and throughout the video he’s letting the ball get over the back or getting out marked in contests. Very rarely does he get a clean spoil or leap (Lever) or push bodies out of the way (May) to intercept mark. Teaching him to spoil shouldn’t be too hard, he’s in position and has the athleticism, but teaching anyone to take contested marks is very hard.

But was it horrible kicking for goal or horrible forward efficiency? Because Gawn had a Gawn set shot. And the spoil on Oliver’s shot (which was mostly his fault but also the teams for not having multiple players on the line). And otherwise Fritsch missed a couple of what are probably 50:50’s for most players but more like 70:30’s for him. Quite possibly he was down 20% due to injury/match fitness. On expected score I think we were about 3 goals under. That’s significant, but hardly a massive butcher job when so many were low percentage. Im much more worried about the players inabilities to take risks with the ball up field and moving quickly to marking forwards than I am pure goal kicking. But I’m also of the belief that a couple of healthy key forwards and a fraction more class and speed from midfield and half back fixes that problem.

It’s his 4th year? He has some talent, but a little flighty, he benefits from the attention Toby, and Hoges get and the Giants ball movement. Nice pick up by GWS but the opportunity to get him out of there cheaply has well and truly gone.

Moves a whole lot better when the ball is on the ground than Harris thankfully, but doesn’t high point the ball in the air like Harris. Ethan Read is the best key back in this draft, forget the fact that he’s a ruck as a junior. He could be a good forward/ruck or a very good ruck, but he can be a great CHB because he reads and reaches for the ball perfectly. O’Sullivans handballing and movement with the ball on the deck is freakish for a tall. Very good athlete. Good enough kick. Reads the play well. But if you watch closely in aerial contests he doesn’t mark or cleanly spoil overhead with the proficiency you’d expect for a 198cm with good movement. That’s why he’s 7-10 not 3-7 draft range. Same knock on Curtin. Heck of a back flanker, not all that flash as a key tall. Should be developed as a midfielder.

Niners Giants Saints

1 - Reid (yes) 2 - Walter NGA 3 - Duursma - maybe, VFL form wasn’t good and needs muscle and a role to play. Potentially too light for wing, too flaky defensively for half forward in year 1. 4 - McKercher - yes, but to what extent? He’ll be ready to play but probably struggles to impact at half forward and can’t lock midfield minutes. Yes for years 2/3 tho. 5 - Watson - maybe, he’s so small, will earn games but with what impact? 6 - Curtin - yes, will effectively be a tall back flanker from day 1 7 - Sanders - yes to playing, no to meaningful impact is my guess, like most top mids it’s years 2/3/4 more than year 1. 8/9/10 - Caddy, Read, O’Sullivan - doubtful to all Rumour is North’s recruiters want to bid on Read and I think that’s correct, he’d be close to my 2nd rated player in the draft. Plus a compo pick for McKay Suddenly you’re trading for 7 to go with 8. If it’s to take one of Watson or Sanders to go with one of the talls or a winger/flanker from the next group then forget about it. No point selling multiple first rounders and change to draft outside the elite bracket of talent.

Out of contract. The ‘work we have to do’ to get him is deciding if we want to use a 3rd or a future 3rd. That’s it. Will be one of the less difficult trades of the trade period.

The big thing we need is to run and use the ball in to space. Run creates run, space creates space. The windows to target forwards get far larger. It’s a small margin, really it’s probably 10-20% more running for and giving handballs. Kicking gets all the attention but it’s run and handballing through the initial wave of pressure or from intercepts that create the chances for kicking the ball to space.

No one? Sparrow went in to a couple of Carlton floppers when they were trying something and Walsh dived in to the fence. It’s very tricky to intimate without flop artists milking it and costing you goals.

I wish we had the Giants half backs, wings and midfield depth. Whitfield, Ash, Himmelberg, Perryman from half back, Kelly, Cumming and Callaghan through the wings and a commitment to run and link the ball in to space makes playing as a small half forward a lot easier than bludgeoning it down the line. When the Giants ran out of legs in the second half yesterday the opportunities for Bedford largely dried up.

He’s not the full package yet but Pickett fought through awful form issues mid year to play 2 good and almost great finals. Small forwards rarely produce in big finals. May rebounded from a stinking first month to play very well towards the end of the year. Lever played on a man when required, which he’ll likely have to going forward. Hunter actually produced an ok and good final after spudding it up most of the year, he might even go up a level if we add more run around him. Tracc got through some of his goal kicking problems and nearly dragged us over the Pies by himself. Chandler is at least useful. Viney was huge until the last month or so unfortunately. There’s some positives

I think I’d prefer Brisbane if Zorko can get suspended and miss the grand final. But I’m all in on GWS winning next week