DeeSpencer

Langdon failing to give the ball back. Bennell protected area. Possibly Jetta looking upset when Spargo kicked a goal. Looks like 3 goals came from 50M penalties. I guess we should be thankful it wasn't in a real game.

8 goals combined from Melk, Fritsch, Hannan and Hunt operating as mobile marking targets inside 50 in a team with only 1 key forward. Not the game to read much in to McDonald not hitting the scoreboard. He was involved in play, that's a start.

Somewhat ironic that 1 Essendon player and 2 of our players were caught breaking the rules and then we are now the clubs getting punished by the karma bus. Hopefully everyone is ok and the AFL find a reasonable solution. Possibly more alarming is that this might be a community transmission and might indicate there are now a lot of asymptomatic people walking around in Melbourne right now. If we were all tested twice a week I think the case numbers would skyrocket.

Look at the set up and tell me it’s not a 99% chance it was a centre bounce. Gawn’s a pro so I’ll give him a break but otherwise our lazy poorly disciplined midfielders need to learn how to defend space away from the contest. That’s not based on one training it’s based on years of unaccountability.

The McEvoy Mexican wall worked! Worth watching how it goes for a longer sample size and having at as an option for Max

We don't have forwards who can win one on ones so I'm pro moving the ball quickly and getting out in space. We have defenders who can win it back and our mids can thrive in fast paced contested games. A loose ball hacked in to the middle with Oliver and Petracca around and an open forward line is perfect. But that entire style is reliant on a lot of pressure and it's not enough to just throw numbers at the footy to create that pressure, you have to be disciplined as a team to cover off the outlets. Two experienced wingmen were a good start. Notice Langdon above plays it perfectly, covering his opponent whilst creating doubt in the player with the balls mind. After Saturday's game there was a lot of bemoaning Joel Smith flying for contests where he should've stayed down, but I see our midfield and forward pressure as pretty much the same thing on a team wide scale. We leave open guys running free all the time and when we do get turnovers we struggle to capitalise as everyone is congested.

I'm not suggesting every little thing I've highlighted is a huge issue. Petracca may have been working on an attacking clearance. Gawn's not exactly going to kill himself chasing a springy kid at training. But there's a few endemic problems we've had with our midfield being awful defensively (Brayshaw), our pressure game reliant on players rushing towards the ball rather than working together (Oliver) and our mids overusing it and making skill errors (the white team). We're not going to get any better if we can't sort out the basics.

I'm willing to give Clarko the benefit of more than one match. McEvoy has a better kick and movement than Max and is the second best intercepting mark for a ruck, I think it can work in a team that has more run and skill around him. Less Stratton and Frawley, more Impey etc. Gawn sometimes plays like our best backman when he sits behind the play and takes marks, would it really be that crazy to erect a 208cm wall at CHB! I'm thinking more do it for a half or so in a game this year if the game is all but over at half time, or trial it a bit next year. Not this week. Jackson has the tank to play a role early, yes he doesn't have the size and strength to win hit outs and he has a heap of work to do with marking contests, but the run in the legs means he has something to offer. Hit outs themselves are the most overrated part of ruck work, our midfield weren't any worse with Pedersen than there were Gawn.

Nice chase down from Tracc, highlights his improved second efforts. But I have so many questions: 1. Why is he so far forward of the contest to begin with? 2. Why does Gawn let Bradtke out sprint him forward? 3. Why does Brayshaw (sans helmet?) blindly crash in to Oliver, and then after that he seems to drift towards the backline but not even pick up Bradtke on the way through to help Max out? 4. Why does Oliver - forced in to a 2 on 1 after Gus wipes out - initially do a good job of corralling both players and creating doubt in Wagner's (I think) mind then rush up on Wagner right when Tracc is closing in to make a tackle? If Oliver hovers for another step or two Tracc gets the initial tackle or Wagner kicks under pressure. 5. Why does Wagner not hit Jordon (I think) in stride with a regulation handball and why is Jordon thinking about anything else but turning and hitting a leading target. He knew he was free when he called for the ball, but suddenly he's looking to handball out wide to a covered winger? That's a lot of criticism for a short little burst of play that ultimately ended well for the blue team, but if Wagner could handball and Jordon had confidence then 4/5ths of our starting mids have given up a decent kick inside 50. Shiel, McGrath and Merrett will have a field day on Sunday if that's the best we can do and Petracca isn't running down any of those guys with a big headstart.

Goldstein is the closest. Nic Nat if he gets a consistent run of it. Marshall the one who will bridge the gap to the top 2.

Max is great at boundary throw ins but he can’t risk a big jump at the ball at centre bounces due to injury risk and difficulty recovering and following up. Combined with slower inside mids it’s why we’ve always been defensive out of the centre square. Around the ground he’s the best intercept marker in the comp not named McGovern. I just hope we find a defensive system that allows him to keep up with play and be an attacking option as well. If Jackson comes on quickly there’s a case to be made for experimenting with Gawn at CHB like McEvoy

If the plan is to get Lever to intercept by finding the right match up for him then I understand the desire for someone like Oscar in the team. But if the plan is to get Lever to intercept by allowing him to patrol the half back line and dictate to the opposition then Smith's speed, endurance and versatility is a better fit. I think teams have smartened up significantly on intercept defenders. The Crows just chucked Lever on the last dangerous half forward who will often roll up to the stoppage or get stuck in no mans land and then Lever would sit a kick down the line and take easy marks. The days of getting those match ups are over, teams will make an interceptor accountable and drag them back to goal or move the ball around them. To create that intercepting player you have to have versatile defenders capable of swapping opponents and covering for each other. Of course to make that all work you then need a lot of pressure up the ground.

Have you seen us play in the wet under Goodwin - we've been rubbish. It will be a good test to see if we have a game plan that can move the ball and lock it in forward for once, otherwise it's big trouble.

He had 2 defenders next to him to just chip a short pass to. They weren’t moving for him which was disgraceful but he could’ve demanded it. A 4 on 2 wasn’t a good result, it was more luck than anything that the kick fell to the late arriving Dees players.

If we persist 3 flankers in Harmes, Salem and Rivers/Lockhart for more linebreaking run from the backline then it might be Hibberd and Jetta competing for the one lockdown small job. Hibberd has the extra height and speed defensively and more attacking drive (which isn't always good if his disposal is shot) but close checking isn't his strong suit. It feels like it's either one or the other right now.

I wouldn't be too upset if we lost 70% of the clearances if we could actually make sure the opposition doesn't win them cleanly and with free runners going forward and were forced to hack kicks under pressure or turn the ball over. That's pretty much Richmond's game plan. Unfortunately we are acting like it's still 2016 and trying to play the territory game with a group of slow big bodied midfielders. Funny you mention Jackson, if we develop him properly he'll be a weapon at ground level and help us play the kind of accountable footy around a clearance that we should be playing. I hope Gawn has plenty left but he'll always be struggling to keep up with the little guys at the centre bounces.

Huge test for Lever this week coming up against a guy who was deliberately sent out to unsettle him in the grand final in Jacob Townsend. Townsend is a scrubber and dirty. I watched 2 minutes of the Essendon game and he was swinging arms in tackles and holding opponents down way off the ball. He's exactly the kind of player we should've got rather than Mitch Brown! Anyway, back to Lever. He can't be physically intimidated by Townsend. Lever is 24, he's a man now. He has to be smarter, more skilled and tougher than Townsend.

Smith's played 11 AFL games before Saturday, missed the entire 2019 season and has just come off an 8 week break due to a pandemic. Maybe cut him a bit of a break for one really poor decision. He did chop in front of his man and intercept (with a Jetta assist) the crucial game deciding inside 50. Maybe Smith won't be smart enough, that's pretty much the decision they made with Frosty, but his basketball background does give him an understanding of zone/man defending and it's up to May and Jetta and the coaches to get him right. At this stage I'm more concerned about the gigantic holes through our midfield and forward line zone, especially when Marvel stadium should be easier to block up than the MCG. Essendon have started games very strongly getting on their bikes and running in a Richmond wave like fashion

Agree on developing and coaching up more smart leaders. The team should be able to shift tempo smartly and to have some personnel move around for fresh match ups, but developing a plan B with a whole new way to move the ball and for players to move is incredibly difficult. I don't know how many teams actually do it. Also not sure about those payers you've named out of position. It was logical to try Jones at half back, ageing mids have had good success using their smarts across half back for years/decades probably. Salem's been a half back for a long time now, he's one of the leagues most reliable kicks in that role. Gus was getting blitzed out of the centre last year so they tried the wing, eventually got him back on ball, he's now playing a small part of the game on the wing but mostly on ball. Jetta is a deep defender in a zone defense, you play that way and sometimes he'll get left on a tall. Smith forward is a pipe dream based on sitting in the goal square for one preseason game, all his attributes point to a very good defender if developed. One big problem we have is that we have so few versatile players. Of yesterdays forward line the only one you'd trust down back is Fritsch who's had plenty of goes there. Melk and Jones could go on ball. The mids picked really are mids outside of Trac going forward and Oliver resting forward. Harmes could move from the backline but someone then has to take his spot. Same for Salem. We just don't have a lot of skilled and athletic players who can rotate around the ground.

Our list was terrible so Roos and co had no choice but to top it up with Cross, Vince, Bugg, Lewis, Tyson, Hibberd, Garlett etc for short term gains and then we've had some very ordinary draft years lately. That said, 19 of the 22 who played against the Cats in 2018 are still on the list. Only Frost, Tyson and Lewis have gone. I don't think personnel is the biggest issue, I think it's the fact that we didn't have any cohesion at any stage last year, so this year is pretty much a clean start. The forwards and backs probably need a bit of time given the changes, but the mids have played a lot of footy together and added experienced players on the wings. And a lot of the poor errors aren't so much game plan but lack of footy smarts and awareness. 2 guys off the street should be able to work together at AFL level with basic communication and discipline.

Centre bounce attendances from our games so far. Marsh 1: (total 29) Oliver 23 Petracca 23 Viney 21 Sparrow 17 Marsh 2 (total 21) Petracca 19 Oliver 15 Viney 14 Brayshaw 12 Round 1 (total 23) Oliver 19 Viney 18 Petracca 17 Brayshaw 15 I'd expect a reasonably similar ratio from yesterdays game. Of course that doesn't factor in to account what role the players are taking on within that system, but I think Gus got at least some run of it in the middle. My concern is more he's surplus of the same type of player more than whether he's completely fallen off the cliff or not. For a team that needs his skillset I'd imagine he'd still do the job.

Brayshaw's best form came with Viney out and for his many faults Viney brings more burst at the contest, more pressure around the packs and more work rate. In a side with Oliver, Viney and Petracca it's just hard for Gus to get the full minutes as the designated rover where he can use his smarts and clean hands in close to thrive. And he hasn't seemed to make the kind of drastic changes to his preparation to really go to the next level physically, nor can he replicate the first year success he had in the forward line with tackle pressure and hunting the contest. I'd have him play half back but it could just as quickly end badly as go well. I firmly believe they looked in to trading him last year. If they didn't the club was negligent. And I also think the rest of the league probably took one look at his injury history and contract and said you can have a 3rd round pick and pay part of his contract. Freo of previous years probably would've done a better deal but Longmuir is smarter than most.

There's little evidence from training or Casey games that Jordon is a laser like kicker, can be good with some time and space and has penetration but has never looked classy like Rivers did immediately and isn't any quicker than Gus.

Pickett got a week for going to the party. Spargo got one week for going and one week for taking Pickett. Spargo needs a huge kick up the backside. He's turning in to the classic MFC private school kid who's happy collecting a few years of cheques without fulfilling his potential.

At which time of the game did you think Cripps need tagging? The first quarter when we dominated and he got 7 touches and did nothing with them? The second quarter where he only touched it twice? The 3rd quarter where he had 5 touches and 2 clangers. Or the last quarter where he still only had 2 clearances? The midfield did a very good job on Cripps. Easily Cripps' biggest impact on the game was when he went forward in the last quarter and we couldn't get the zones/roles or match ups right. Marc Murphy was the Carlton midfielder who hurt us most. Langdon is a bit improvement but otherwise our midfielders still struggle to defend in space which is very concerning.