sue
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by sue
-
I must be a worse wowser than I thought. I was surprised that any AFL player drinks during the season at all. -
-
-
Trouble for the MFC is that the open door is one of those swinging doors that is likely to hit us in the face. (Another sad MFCSS sufferer)
-
Are C'wood about to have an honourable loss?Or is there no such thing?
-
-
I see the little chat the MFC had about the protected zone after Harmes' penalty (which I expect never happened) has had an effect. Umpire shouting repeatedly to Essendrug player to get out, oplayer ignires him, no 50m penalty.
-
And the commentators said it was a bit soft. AFL, run by turkeys and comments by Ch7 turkeys. If the AFL doesn't penalise players for that .....
-
a good start, and not much more needs doing.. But something needs to be done about the protected zone rule (or its interpretation) and ensuring the 30 second kick at goal rule is not manipulated. And I still can't see the justification of a kick from straight in front if a mark is taken anywhere in the goal square, though I doubt it makes much difference.
-
That would make a lot of sense if there had not been some stupid rules made in recent times. I'd prefer reversing them (or making them more sensible where possible) to putting my faith in the game taking care of itself.
-
-
And what action taken by our supporters would have made any difference? Microwaving membership cards? Personally while I hang onto just a thread of hope for this year, I think the future looks bright. All I ask is a competitive team and we seem to have one now. Placing all one's hopes in terms of a flag is a recipe for disappointment. After all, crude statistics says a team will win a flag once in every 18 years. A couple of sigma on that will mean no flag in a lifetime is quite likely. Feel free to attribute our lack of success to my attitude. I revel in my unexpected powers.
-
In the time it takes to ensure merely 2 players are on the other side of the line, it gives all other players plenty of time to congest even more.
-
Yeah, that annoys me as well. But at least it's not illegal. These ideas of zones at the bounce are insane. Words fail me. The only rational conclusion is that the Russian soccer federation has the dirt on the current AFL management and are plotting the elimination of Aussie rules. Where are ASIS/ASIO when you need them?
-
Don't wait for the ball to come out of a pile of players, just ball it up quickly before they get there makes a lot of sense. 'm always annoyed when players just jump onto the tackled player and his tackler to create a ball up. They often even tackle an oppo who is in the pile who doesn't have to ball. Why is that not a free?
-
There is no hope of sense from the AFL. Almost every new rule/interpretation has not been thought through which is why we are in this mess. Even something as innocuous as the 30 second rule is going to be rorted or controversial in an important match. Close to the siren in a close game someone kicking for goal other than Ben Brown will take 2 minutes to walk in from 100 metres away. Ben Brown will be able to because that is his 'natural arc'. Other players may or may not be called to play on at some random distance from the mark or for some walking speed deemed too slow. The problem is that the rule says start moving toward goal within 30 seconds. It should be kick the ball within say, 45 seconds. Too bloody obvious for Gil and his mates.
-
that's what would be so disappointing.
-
Though the opposition will not be so frantic as in a one goal game, we should practice that when we are 5 goals ahead with 2 mins to go
-
Why does the AFL care how many coaches are squeezed into the coaches box? And if some were outside the box, how do you limit the number of people coaching? Does advice from Demonlanders in the Match Day thread count as coaching......
-
Only because Channel 7 felt they needed more ads. Make it 7 metres everywhere (with sane interpretations when players try to get away) and the game will be more interesting.
-
True, but it's hard to see any rule changes that limit the number of easy goals purely for commercial reasons. A prize to anyone who can tell me why a mark anywhere in the goal square is taken from directly in front. Doesn't save much time and no skill is involved whatsoever. Or why the space given to players kicking from the boundary is so big (doubtless related to the farcical 10m exclusion zone) so that players now hardly ever miss. Sometimes the umps are slack about enforcing it and players sneak in to within 7 metres and then there is some real pressure on the kicker. Much more interesting but fewer ads I guess.
-
see my cynical remark in the Umpire thread
-
Typical head-in-the-sand attitude by AFL. Yes, legal within the current rules, but no consideration that the AFL needs to make sure that the rules can't be 'played' to the detriment of the game. And in the rare cases where this may be impossible to prevent, then the umps already have authority to rule on whether a free kick is deserved or staged.
-
I'd be prepared to bet that some supporters of other clubs say the same thing about their club. There is such a thing as an honourable loss, though of course an honourable win (or even a dishonourable umpire-assisted one) is better. How about this on the 'goodness' scale: Win > Honourable loss > typical drubbing we used to have all the time
-
