layzie

Well that's pretty disappointing. Game on

Teams will have lull patches, it's a fact of life. What has always been the problem with this mob is the gap between the best and worst. To completely turn around the clearance rate like that isn't good enough. We should at least still be getting our hands on it at least 1 in 4. Will need an early one in the 3rd because I can see a long period without a goal coming and the commentators piping up about it.

Really too the foot off the gas with those clearances

Textbook Melbourne Junk time conceded goal

Wow he's still at it!

Geez I'd love to keep the blue baggers goalless for the half.

Missing some targets

Jetta-Mackay matchup bothers me

Trac is looking Judd like around the contest.

Who else was really hoping for a Carlton shutout?

The tackling pressure is on fire. It's usually always the key difference.

Getting reward for effort. Pressure is immense in the 50

Trent Rivers cucumber boy as in cool as a

Absolutely smashing the clearances. Make it count

What a grab by Trac. He's looking so strong

Totally agree, if there's any future for him at all it's in the forward 50

Just saw the pre game Zoom with Mahoney. Sounds like Hunt will be spending more time up forward for speed around the contest. Has a point bit to prove, would love to see him snag a couple.

Was way too early to even be talking about crowds at games before the restart even got underway. But while we're at it I too would be pretty peeved if members weren't given preference. Actually I wouldn't be peeved I'd be flabbergasted because what would be the incentive to sign up in future?

Love the question. I think talent wise 94 can't be beaten. 2000 had great talent too but it was also a partial rebuild which some may not have predicted to do quite as well as they did. 98 was probably the best chance to smash and grab. I'm going with 94, the bees difference being an injury free Ox.

I voted no but give it a shot why not. Having a steadfast opinion on anything right now is futile, have to try things. Doesn't mean it's not weird though.

Remember when Luke Darcy pointing to guys like Jack Watts growing beards and saying this was the reason we were losing by 100 points each week was a thing?

At least for the time being we can boo until our lungs are sore.

Yeah I wasn't sure about this and didn't really get the rationale behind it. Shorter quarters but more on the bench. The people 'for' shorter quarters use the point that the best players stay on longer so how would this help that argument? One or the other I think.

We need guys who are prepared to run both ways.

Just wait for the ball to hit a defenceless cutout of a young kid in the crowd and HD cameras catching it perfectly. Have fun with that PR AFL.