Jump to content

Bonkers

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Bonkers replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    With Gawn, Trac, Clarry and Viney we have something to build around. We also have May to come back in. I think the real improvement will come once the new additions settle into the side. If we can add Windsor, Lindsay, Langford and Kozzy to that midfield rotation by the end of the season that will give our midfield a more dynamic mix and more than just the stoppage dominant team we built our flag around. A couple of concerns for me is we donā€™t have a dominant forward, but that is something widespread in the AFL and there is only a couple of teams lucky to have them at the moment. The new players like Landford and XL may allow us to play CP forward more towards the end of the year and he is a genuine match winner, as is Kozzy. The other concern is that we are being burnt in transition regularly off our half forward line. Iā€™m not sure if itā€™s whether we donā€™t have enough pace, or not enough pressure but GWS weā€™re willing to gamble a few times through there yesterday and got rewards. We havenā€™t been able to add that to our game, but there are some signs with Windsor and XL that it may change. We are reliant on the development of the younger players to move us forward. We are a work in progress. Iā€™d rather be glass half full after yesterday, there was a lot of positives and the pressure and intensity was there. Special mention to XL who really impressed, he has great awareness and footy smarts, great skills and seems a natural at AFL level, seeing or reading the game before others.
  2. Bonkers replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Watching the replay 11:37 left in the first quarter. Dwayne Russell ā€œItā€™s their home, but itā€™s not really their home. They live in a shed really. In fact they donā€™t get to be on this lounge room floor all that oftenā€ Pretty sure he is just making things up as he goes and saying whatever weird stuff comes into his head.
  3. Bonkers replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Out of curiosity what is your knock on Jagga? From what I have seen he has some of the most natural ability and skills in the draft? He is a player profile we don't currently have as he uses the ball wall in short, runs hard, accumulates and links up play? He may not have the size or top line athletic attributes of others perhaps? Edit: Just noticed he ran a 6:27min 2km time trial.
  4. Bonkers replied to Oxdee's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Surely you get an indication of what the other party is willing to pay before you go and tell a player to have a look around. I'm not having a go at you by the way, just that this whole process and the way it has been orchestrated by the club is an absolute [censored] show. I'm all for having honest discussions with players and so forth, but how could the club allow Clarry to go and have a chat to Geelong knowing they had sweet F All to offer? The stupidity and incompetence is bewildering.
  5. Like I said, you should consider editing or removing your post. He is currently head of the board of said, City on a Hill. The church isn't right wing, it is just a church like other churches. He didn't write an article as you have mentioned. He hasn't given any sermons. No worries, you can leave your post but, I think it's quite ironic you are willing to character assassinate someone for something you don't seem to know much about and have listed factually incorrect information.
  6. That's not an accurate assessment of the situation or Thorburn's character. You should consider deleting your post.
  7. Bonkers replied to Norm Smith's Curse's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Potentially low risk with high reward if the price and terms are right. Not sure if we would have any more luck getting him fit than what Carlton has though.
  8. I wonder if there is any chance the club may consider trading next years first rounder into this year to have another pick in the first round? Probably depends a little bit on what we would require to draft Kalani White next year I presume.
  9. Bonkers replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    She is his commercial and brand manager since April, not just his partner. As people have mentioned his player manager advised against this course of action in terms of seeking a trade, they went ahead anyway.
  10. Bonkers replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    For the naysayers who mentioned it was all media noise, Jon Ralph reported on Fox that Petracca and his fiancĆ© both personally approached other clubs to find a trade solution to get out of Melbourne in the last few weeks. They also exhaustively approached pro scouts etc to find a potential trade route. Donā€™t shoot the messenger.
  11. John Ralph has mentioned that Smith has been asked by the board to fill the vacant position on the board at the end of the year. He also mentioned that he wonā€™t considering sitting on the board just to be a board member and that if he accepts he is likely to be the next president and will replace Roffey. edit: spelling
  12. Bonkers replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I'm pretty sure we traded our second rounder for McAdam? We may have got a second rounder back in the Grundy trade?
  13. Bonkers replied to Travy14's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Reminds me of the Billings and Hunter trades, washed up and past their best. Canā€™t say Iā€™m excited about this or the current direction of the club and overall recruitment strategy at the moment. Bring on the external review, accountability and transparency at all levels of the club.
  14. With pick 5 we will hypothetically get a 200 game player of elite talent who we can shape the team around, most probably a midfielder to replace Brayshaw. If we trade for Houston and get 13 back, we get an AA half back flanker for another 70-100 games and a speculative mid teens pick. Iā€™m not sure having Houston is really going to evolve our team that much that it will move the needle and put us back into contention. If we are looking to trade pick 5 I think weā€™d be better going for a Key Position player or an elite midfield talent if available as it is more likely to have a greater impact on our team. One of our best finishers going inside 50 at times was Windsor, if we can find a midfielder in the draft with footy smarts and is a good kick that should compliment our existing midfield.
  15. Yeh itā€™s a good foundation or footing for our game. But that can be built upon in other areas when we have the ball.