daisycutter

ha, i find myself in a state of equineamity

could've just gone with onya, would've fitted in nicely

you should change your moniker to 'annie get your gun'

i must say as a kid i remember footy grounds with a bike race track around the ground, so i suppose a horse track is not that much different - lol

....albeit very slowly

well that's a bit of a relief now it's time to ditch the ex completely......no second teams

yes, looks can be deceiving it seems peel back a few layers and what have we got........a bluebagger! i think you might be due for re-education, wcw. you can have storm as your second team, if you must

the stuffed toy definitely gives you away....lol

yeah, no need to stirr up the situation

all this horse-talk is giving me a mare

so what is the $400 per year for?

make it action jackson and then it can refer to viney

any decent jockey

serves you right, red for not paying your protection money

i did the same thing to my heel when i was 18 and didn't realise until i turned 40 and had an xray. i did know i'd hurt it but had no idea i'd fractured it. at the time could walk on it ok but jumping hurt. 😆

and don't forget, wcw, an army marches on its stomach, so take plenty of nibbles

i though the peptides went it alone with their own website, but that may have changed recently

and sc

ru serious? plenty of seats they could negotiate for with mcg

and a joint cba would be great........but if it would be fairer, separate cbas would be good ???

another ralphy special......ppfffft

good idea on point 2. player would have to nominate he's going for a goal, say within 5 seconds. then ump signals time off. if he doesn't nominate then he gets the usual 5 seconds (or whatever it is). if he nominates then doesn't shoot for goal, no probs. all sounds too sensible. p.s, if he does nominate and the game clock is stopped he still only gets a max of 30 secs, else play-on signalled

given my heritage is scots irish that's refreshing to hear, rab......but i already knew that 😉 but there is always just a little truth in those myths

oh, thanks rab. the concept of a scotsman willingly handing over money is a strange one for me 🤣

as far as i remember, only if you moved off the line. of course when opponents started standing to the left or the right it became hard to actually know where the [censored] line was, and for the sake of keeping the game moving the umpires got very lax in setting out the mark properly as they used to do. these days the kicker cribs grossly around the mark a lot especially when the mark is outside the corridor. it drives me spare. the "line" should always be a straight line from the centre of the goals to the mark then extending back as for the standing on the mark. i would only pay the 50m if the opponent moved fwd of the mark or more than 1 pace laterally left or right. and only play-on if off the mark. for the fake play-on let the umpire use his common sense and just reset