daisycutter

he's certainly got a man crush on himself

i thought the old east melbourne ground was much closer to the city in fact city side of jolimont residential edit: oops, if i had read ahead i would have seen others had already covered this

no doubt your pleasant walk (and mine, i might add) gets off to a bad start though having to walk past the toiges punt road oval.

why the fascination with weids, fence? has done nothing much this year really. still early in his development cycle

the one aspect i like is the commercial (i.e. revenue) aspect of siting this over the rail-line in east melbourne. A medical centre (presumably sports med), extensive gym facilities, social club and an apartment complex (possibly other uses too) are all important revenue raising opportunities and an imperative to mfc in lieu of our now extinguished pokie revenue. the location is particularly important for commercial ventures compared with say near gosch's paddock. it is a perfect location for commercial exploitation, and importantly the buildings are not on yarra park lands

i always understood it to not include the station but to be eastwards of the station (buildings and oval)

a little bit more i'm still sticking with my 44,444 forecast......602 to go 43,842

you do cut to the chase admirably, ethan

we'll just dedicate it that great indigenous game - marngrook - solved

well the oval would be open to the public during non-training periods and the parkland involved would be free from parking....so there are benefits for locals and greens the club building facilities will be on railway land so that shouldn't upset them they will probably still get upset just because they can though

yes, we take over the hilton

quite agree about 2013 i blame prodee for that, he was the chief cheerleader for the classy outside mid as for now......even if he wanted to, we were never in the race with nothing to trade

and pray tell what were we going to trade with?

i agree it is hard to frame the rules for those situations that are not overtly violent, threatening or aggressive. a bit of common sense needs to be applied but that still wouldn't satisfy anyone. maybe the option of 2 levels of fines for the minor stuff with the more serious stuff clearly defined and sent straight to the mro

hence my last point about being vaudevillian

down to a trickle 43,820

uncle, you will need to check with the the department of agriculture and food, western australia's (dafwa) quarantinewa service regarding your fungal infection. would hate to see you turned back at the border are you taking your favourite demonland hitch hiker?

well, do you really want to see players (regardless of brownlow aspirations) lose games for minor inconsequential umpire touching. in most cases being fined guilty of misconduct and fined seems appropriate the only one of the recent charges that had a serious element to it was hawkins who appeared to lose his temper (then backed off). he rightly got referred to the mrp no doubt though the processes and commentary we have seen recently have been a bit vaudevillian

nope.......you get fined......lol

deep

or squirrel gripped......

specially when playing interstate at adelaide, perth or jeelong 33% more chance an ump will pickup the crowd confirmation

i'm not even sure if the term full-back has any meaning these days given zone defence, intercept players, sweepers and pressing both ways. rance could be described as a chb as much as a fb depending on the opposition and matchups

43,813